Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth global defining functions for strongly pseudoconvex boundaries

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D⊂Cn, n≥1, be a bounded domain with C∞ boundary, strongly pseudoconvex at every boundary point. Then there are a neighborhood U of D‾ and ρ∈C∞(U,R) with D={ρ<0} in U, dρ≠0 on ∂D, and ρ strictly plurisubharmonic near ∂D.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; D and its local smooth strongly pseudoconvex boundary data.

[F1]

A local defining function ri is smooth, defines the negative side D, has nonzero differential on the boundary, and has positive Levi form on every nonzero complex tangent vector (Levi pseudoconvex domains).

[F2]

For compact K in an open Euclidean set V there is a smooth cutoff in [0,1], equal to 1 near K and compactly supported in V (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization).

[F3]

Strict plurisubharmonicity is positive definiteness of the Levi form (The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).

Choice use. AC licenses the stated ambient hypotheses; the compact-boundary cover and cutoffs use finitely many selections.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

Compactness of ∂D supplies finitely many local defining charts and smaller relatively compact neighborhoods covering ∂D. Shrink them so each local differential stays nonzero on the boundary in its chart and each tangential Levi form stays positive there. By [F2] take nonnegative smooth bumps bi supported in the charts and equal to 1 on the smaller neighborhoods. On a neighborhood T of ∂D where B=∑ibi>0, put λi=bi/B and r0=∑iλiri, extending each supported product by zero outside its chart. This is smooth and has the same negative, zero and positive sides as the local defining functions. At a boundary point, all active differentials are positive multiples of one outward conormal: they annihilate the common real tangent hyperplane and evaluate positively on an outward vector. Thus dr0=∑iλidri≠0.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

If v is complex tangent at a boundary point, then ∂ri(v)=0 for all active charts and ri=0. The product rule therefore gives Lr0(v)=∑iλiLri(v)>0(v≠0). Terms involving derivatives of the weights vanish because they contain either ri or a tangential first derivative of ri. By [F2] choose η∈Cc∞(T,[0,1]) equal to 1 near ∂D. Define s=−1 on D and s=1 on Cn∖D‾, and define r=ηr0+(1−η)s off ∂D, with r=r0=0 on the boundary. Here ηr0 is extended by zero off T, and (1−η)s is zero near the boundary. Hence r is globally smooth, negative exactly on D, positive outside D‾, and agrees with r0 near the boundary.

3.1F3step 1.1step 2.1algebra

On the compact boundary put a=∂r. Its norm has a positive lower bound m, and the operator norm of the Levi matrix of r has a finite bound M. For n>1 the tangential Levi form has a uniform positive bound λ. Write any v=t+w with t∈ker⁡a and w⊥ker⁡a. Then ∣a(v)∣=∣a∣ ∣w∣≥m∣w∣ and Lr(v)≥λ∣t∣2−2M∣t∣∣w∣−M∣w∣2≥λ2∣t∣2−(M+2M2λ)∣w∣2. Choose C with Cm2>M+2M2/λ. For n=1 the tangent space is zero and one instead chooses Cm2>M. In either case Lr(v)+C∣a(v)∣2>0 for every nonzero v on the boundary.

4.1F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

Set ρ=eCr−1. The chain rule gives Lρ(v)=CeCr(Lr(v)+C∣∂r(v)∣2). Step 3.1 and compactness give strict positivity on a neighborhood of ∂D. The function is C∞ because the constructed r is C∞; its negative set is exactly D and dρ=Cdr≠0 on the boundary. Restricting to any neighborhood U of D‾ gives the Statement.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources