Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive smooth collars for strictly plurisubharmonic negative sets

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let D⊂Cn, n≥1, be bounded and open, with nonempty boundary. Suppose U⊃D‾ is open, ρ∈C∞(U,R), D={ρ<0} in U, and ρ is strictly plurisubharmonic near ∂D. No nonvanishing-gradient condition is imposed.

For every open O with D‾⊂O⊂U, there are finitely many pairwise disjoint bounded domains G1,…,GN such that D‾⊂G:=⋃i=1NGi,G‾⊂O, each Gi has C∞ strongly pseudoconvex boundary, and each Gi admits a continuous plurisubharmonic exhaustion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the data of the Statement; and the prescribed neighborhood O.

[F1]

A fixed smooth Euclidean bump b is nonnegative, equals 1 on the closed unit ball and has support in the radius-two ball (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs).

[F2]
[F3]

Smooth real-valued maps have dense regular values; a regular level is locally a smooth graph (Regular values have null complement and are dense, A regular level set is locally a Ck graph of dimension m−n).

[F4]

For smooth functions the nonnegative Levi form characterizes plurisubharmonicity; strict positivity is the positive-definite Levi form condition (The C^2 Levi criterion for plurisubharmonicity, The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).

[F5]

Nonnegative sums, finite maxima and convex nondecreasing composition preserve plurisubharmonicity (Basic stability operations for plurisubharmonic functions). An exhaustion has compact sublevel sets in its domain (Plurisubharmonic exhaustions and Hartogs pseudoconvexity).

Choice use. AC supplies the choice hypotheses of [F3]. The bump sequence, its coefficients and their sum below are explicit after fixing an enumeration of rational balls; the remaining selections are finite.

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

Put F=D‾. Enumerate all rational centers qj∈Q2n and positive rational radii rj for which B‾(qj,2rj)∩F=∅. Their inner balls cover Cn∖F: openness of the complement supplies a sufficiently small ball, then a rational center and radius. Set bj(x)=b((x−qj)/rj), Mj=max⁡∣α∣≤jsup⁡R2n∣Dαbj∣,aj=2−j1+Mj,β=∑j≥1ajbj. Each Mj is finite since the derivatives have compact support. For every fixed multi-index α, the tail with j≥∣α∣ is bounded termwise by 2−j, so the series of derivatives converges uniformly. Apply [F2] on coordinate segments in closed boxes, successively to every derivative: the limit is C∞ with Dαβ=∑jajDαbj. Every derivative vanishes on F, while at any point outside F some bj is 1; hence β≥0 and β−1(0)=F. This argument proves smoothness across F, without assuming local finiteness of the bumps there.

2.1F4step 1.1given

Choose a compact neighborhood of ∂D contained in the strict Levi collar of ρ and in U. Compactness of this neighborhood times the unit sphere gives a uniform positive lower Levi bound for ρ and a finite upper absolute Levi bound for β. Thus for some t>0, ψ:=ρ+tβ is strictly plurisubharmonic on an open neighborhood V of ∂D. On F it agrees with ρ, so it is negative on D and zero on ∂D; on U∖F both ρ≥0 and β>0, so ψ>0. In particular {ψ<0}=D and the zero set of ψ in U is exactly ∂D.

3.1F3F4step 2.1

Choose a bounded open W with F⊂W and W‾⊂U. Then ∂W is compact and disjoint from F, so min⁡∂Wψ>0. On the compact set W‾∖O the function ψ is positive whenever that set is nonempty. On W‾∖V the compact subset where ψ≥0 also has a positive minimum if nonempty, since its zero set would lie in ∂D⊂V. Choose a positive regular value ε smaller than all these positive minima, using [F3]. Then S={x∈W:ψ(x)<ε} contains F, has S‾⊂O∩W, and its boundary lies in V∩{ψ=ε}. Regular-level charts show that ∂S is smooth and that the inside half of each such chart is connected. Consequently every connected component of S has smooth boundary locally defined by ψ−ε, with strictly positive tangential Levi form by step 2.1.

4.1F4F5step 3.1given

Components of the open set S are open and cover the compact set F, so finitely many distinct components Gi cover F. Their union G satisfies the required compact containment. In each Gi choose an open neighborhood Ni of ∂Gi with Ni‾⊂V. Put f=−log⁡(ε−ψ) on Gi. It is smooth and plurisubharmonic near ∂Gi by [F5], and tends to +∞ there. The set Gi‾∖Ni is a compact subset of Gi, so choose Ai greater than its maximum of f. The function Ei=max⁡{f,Ai}+∣z∣2 is continuous and plurisubharmonic: near the boundary both terms in the maximum are psh; near every point outside Ni the maximum is the constant Ai; these descriptions agree on their overlap. Its sublevels are closed in Gi and stay away from the boundary, hence are compact in the bounded Gi. Thus it is an exhaustion.

5.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1∎

The domains Gi constructed in steps 3.1–4.1 have all the properties in the Statement, including when the original boundary has critical points or the original ρ has zeros outside D‾.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources