How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A regular level set is locally a graph of dimension
Statement
Let be , , and let be a regular value. Near each point, a regular level set is a graph over of dimension .
More precisely, for put and , so . There are neighbourhoods of and of and a map with and such that, near , The empty fibre satisfies the regular-value convention vacuously, and when the local graph has zero-dimensional domain and is the isolated point .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated map, regular value , and a point .
Surjectivity of persists nearby, and a constant-rank level is locally a coordinate slice (Regular and critical points, regular and critical values, and level sets, Differential rank is lower semicontinuous, A constant-rank level set is locally a coordinate slice).
If is a subspace of the finite-dimensional Euclidean inner-product space , then ; rank-nullity gives , and the inverse function theorem turns an invertible derivative into a local diffeomorphism whose inverse is when the original map is (For a subspace of a finite-dimensional inner product space, , Rank-nullity: , The Euclidean inverse function theorem, A local inverse of a regular map is ).
Proof
By [L1], has constant rank near , and its fibre is a coordinate slice. By [L2], put , so and .
The projection of that slice to along has derivative equal to the identity at : its tangent there is , because differentiating the normal-form slice and undoing the source coordinates gives . By [L2], this projection is a local diffeomorphism.
Inverting the projection writes the slice uniquely as . Its derivative at takes values both in and in the tangent , so ; the zero-dimensional case is the same statement with .
This gives the asserted graph and dimension at every point of a nonempty regular fibre, while the empty-fibre case is vacuous.
Depends on
- Regular and critical points, regular and critical values, and level sets
- Differential rank is lower semicontinuous
- A constant-rank level set is locally a coordinate slice
- For a subspace $W$ of a finite-dimensional inner product space, $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Rank-nullity: $\dim_F V=\operatorname{nullity}T+\operatorname{rank}T$
- The Euclidean inverse function theorem
- A local inverse of a $C^k$ regular map is $C^k$
Used by
- The cone x²+y²=z² has a rank drop at its apex Counterexample
- The cusp y²=x³ has a rank drop at the origin Counterexample
- A Euclidean sphere is a regular level set with tangent hyperplanes Example
- A positive-definite quadratic ellipsoid is a regular level set Example
- The graph of a Cᵏ Euclidean map is a regular level set Example
- The one-sheeted hyperboloid is a regular surface of revolution Example
- The orthogonal group is a regular level set of dimension n(n-1)/2 Example
- FALSE: every level set of a smooth map is locally a graph False statement
- Regular level surfaces have local regular parametrizations with the same tangent plane Theorem
- Tangent vectors to a regular level set are exactly its curve velocities Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, Regular Level Set Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- L. W. Tu, An Introduction to Manifolds, Section 11.2 (standard reference, not scraped)