How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The cusp has a rank drop at the origin
Statement refuted
A polynomial level curve need not be regular everywhere. The zero level of has derivative rank away from the origin and rank at the origin.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polynomial and the curve .
The power rule and derivative algebra give the continuous Jacobian row and ; the continuous-partials theorem identifies that row with (For a natural the function is differentiable everywhere with derivative ; for it is the constant , with derivative ; for a natural the function is differentiable at every with derivative ; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when , The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative, The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral).
Regularity means surjectivity of the derivative, and a regular level is locally a graph (Regular and critical points, regular and critical values, and level sets, A regular level set is locally a graph of dimension ).
Counterexample
One has , so the parametrized cusp lies in the zero level, and [L1] gives and .
If lies on , then , so has rank and is surjective onto .
Hence the derivative rank drops precisely at the cusp point. The two values for prevent a graph there, while the relation is not differentiable at , in accord with the missing hypothesis in [L2].
The polynomial level curve therefore supplies the claimed rank-drop counterexample.
Depends on
- Regular and critical points, regular and critical values, and level sets
- A regular level set is locally a $C^k$ graph of dimension $m-n$
- The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral
- For a natural $n \ge 1$ the function $x \mapsto x^{n}$ is differentiable everywhere with derivative $\iota(n)\,x^{\,n-1}$; for $n = 0$ it is the constant $1$, with derivative $0$; for a natural $n \ge 1$ the function $x \mapsto x^{-n}$ is differentiable at every $x \ne 0$ with derivative $-\iota(n)\,x^{-n-1}$; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: $(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c)$, $(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c)$, $(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c)$, and $(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2}$ when $g(c) \ne 0$
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, regular-level examples (standard reference, not scraped)