How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A local inverse of a regular map is
Statement
Let , let be open, and let be , with invertible. Then every local inverse supplied by the inverse function theorem at is . In its inverse neighbourhood it satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and the closure theorem Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition.
The inverse function theorem supplies an inverse that is and satisfies (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).
If the entries of are and never vanishes, then the entries of are (Matrix inversion preserves regularity where the determinant is nonzero).
Proof
By [L1], the local inverse exists, is , and satisfies throughout its domain.
Suppose and is . Because is , the entries of are , hence when ; closure under composition makes , and [L2] makes . Therefore is . Starting from step 1.1 and repeating this finite bootstrap reaches .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Remark 8.5.8 (standard reference, not scraped)