How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An injective regular map is a diffeomorphism onto its image
Statement
Let , let be open, and let be an injective map whose derivative is invertible everywhere. Then is open and the corestriction is a diffeomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and the diffeomorphism convention of Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms.
Under the corresponding hypotheses, is open and is a diffeomorphism (An injective regular map is a diffeomorphism onto its image).
If is for , then every local inverse supplied by the inverse function theorem is (A local inverse of a regular map is ).
Proof
Since a map with is , [L1] supplies the open image and the unique global inverse .
Around each , the inverse agrees with the unique local inverse of . By [L2] that restriction is . Thus is locally, and hence globally, , so the corestriction is a diffeomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Remark 8.5.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- University of Toronto MAT237, §3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)