Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth strict plurisubharmonic regularization of a psh exhaustion

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC) and the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Cn, n≥1, be a domain and let u:Ω→R be a continuous plurisubharmonic exhaustion, that is, u is continuous and plurisubharmonic and every sublevel set {z∈Ω:u(z)≤c}, c∈R, is a compact subset of Ω.

Then there exist a function S∈C∞(Ω) and a strictly increasing sequence c1<c2<⋯ with ck→+∞ such that, writing Ωk:={z∈Ω:S(z)<ck}:

  1. S is strictly plurisubharmonic on Ω, S>u on Ω, and S is again an exhaustion of Ω, that is, {z∈Ω:S(z)≤c} is a compact subset of Ω for every real c;
  2. every ck is a regular value of S, and ∂Ωk={z∈Ω:S(z)=ck} is a nonempty C∞ hypersurface of Ω;
  3. Ωk‾⊆Ωk+1 and ⋃k≥1Ωk=Ω, so every Ωk‾ is a compact subset of Ω;
  4. (strong pseudoconvexity) for every k, every p∈∂Ωk and every v∈Cn∖{0} with ∑j<n∂S∂zj(p) vj=0 one has LS(p;v)>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Countable Choice; a domain Ω⊆Cn with n≥1; and a continuous plurisubharmonic exhaustion u:Ω→R.

[F1]

A function u:Ω→R is a continuous plurisubharmonic exhaustion when it is continuous, plurisubharmonic, and every sublevel {u≤c} is compact in Ω (Plurisubharmonic exhaustions and Hartogs pseudoconvexity).

[F2]

(Richberg's approximation theorem.) If v∈Psh⁡(X) is continuous and strictly plurisubharmonic on an open set V⊆X, with Hv>γ for a continuous positive Hermitian form γ, then for every continuous 0<λ<1 there is v~∈C0(X)∩C∞(V) such that v≤v~≤v+λ on V and Hv~>(1−λ)γ; if v is strictly plurisubharmonic on all of X, v~ can be chosen strictly plurisubharmonic on all of X (Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, Ch. I §5.E, Theorem 5.21, printed pp. 43-44).

[F3]

For a smooth map from a finite-dimensional manifold to R, the regular values are dense; in particular every nonempty open interval contains a regular value when the Axiom of Countable Choice holds (Regular values have null complement and are dense).

[F4]

A value c is regular for S if every point of S−1(c) is a regular point; an empty fibre is regular by convention (Regular and critical points and values).

[F5]

A regular level of a smooth real-valued function on an open subset of RN is locally a smooth graph of dimension N−1 (A regular level set is locally a Ck graph of dimension m−n).

[F6]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice; The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), and AC states that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

Choice use. AC and ACω are the ambient hypotheses. The proof uses ACω only to choose a sequence of regular values from nonempty open intervals; each such interval contains regular values by [F3].

Proof

technique · Richberg approximation, followed by Sard's theorem
1.1F1algebra

Put u0:=u+∣z∣2+1 and γ:=12H∣z∣2. Then u0 is continuous and plurisubharmonic, and Hu0≥H∣z∣2>γ because u is plurisubharmonic. It is an exhaustion: if u0(z)≤c, then u(z)≤c−1, and {u0≤c} is closed in Ω; thus it is a closed subset of the compact set {u≤c−1}. Moreover u0>u everywhere.

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Apply [F2] to u0 on X=V=Ω with the constant error λ=1/2. This gives S∈C∞(Ω) satisfying u0≤S≤u0+1/2 and HS>12γ. Hence S is strictly plurisubharmonic, S>u, and S is an exhaustion because each sublevel {S≤c} is closed in Ω and contained in the compact sublevel {u0≤c}.

3.1F3F6step 2.1given

Fix z0∈Ω. The exhaustion S is unbounded above: otherwise Ω={S≤c} for some c, making the noncompact open set Ω compact. Choose an integer M>S(z0). For each k≥1, [F3] supplies a regular value in the fixed nonempty interval (M+2k,M+2k+1); ACω selects one such ck for each k. Then c1<c2<⋯, ck→+∞, and every level {S=ck} is nonempty: the continuous image S(Ω) is an interval because Ω is connected, it contains S(z0), and it is unbounded above.

4.1F1F4F5step 2.1step 3.1

Set Ωk:={S<ck}. Each Ωk‾ is contained in the compact set {S≤ck}, and Ωk‾⊆{S≤ck}⊆{S<ck+1}=Ωk+1. The sublevels cover Ω because ck→+∞. Continuity gives ∂Ωk⊆{S=ck}; conversely, every point of the regular level S=ck is a boundary point by the implicit function theorem. Thus ∂Ωk={S=ck} is a nonempty smooth hypersurface, by [F4] and [F5].

5.1

At every p∈∂Ωk the function S−ck defines Ωk near p. Since S is strictly plurisubharmonic, every nonzero complex tangent vector v satisfies LS(p;v)>0. Steps 2.1–4.1 establish the remaining assertions in the Statement. [F1, F2, step 2.1, step 4.1] □

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources