Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

28 results · all verified · 9 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 19 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page builds smooth partitions of unity from explicit flat and step functions, Euclidean and manifold bumps, and locally finite normalization. It then uses that machinery for smooth Urysohn separation, extension by zero, gluing of real-valued local data, compact exhaustions, and proper exhaustion functions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The standard flat function

Definition

Define β:RR by β(t):={exp(1/t),t>0,0,t0. This is the standard flat function.

Remarks

  • β(t)>0 for every t>0.
  • The only nontrivial point in later arguments is the junction at t=0.
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Exponential decay dominates every inverse power near zero

Statement

For every mN, one has β(t)/tm0 as t0+, where β is the standard flat function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: mN.

[F1]

For t>0, the standard flat function satisfies β(t)=exp(1/t) (The standard flat function).

[L1]

For every mN and every a>0, xm/exp(ax)0 as x+ (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For t>0, put x:=1/t; then x+ as t0+ and β(t)/tm=xm/exp(x) by [F1].

F1givenconstruct
2.1

The expression xm/exp(x) tends to 0 by [L1] with a=1.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Therefore β(t)/tm0 as t0+.

step 2.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The standard flat function is smooth and flat at zero

Statement

The standard flat function β is smooth on R, and β(n)(0)=0 for every nN0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard flat function β.

[F1]

The standard flat function is 0 on (,0] and is exp(1/t) on (0,) (The standard flat function).

[L1]

For every mN, one has β(t)/tm0 as t0+ (Exponential decay dominates every inverse power near zero).

[A1]

For each nN0 there is a polynomial Pn such that β(n)(t)=Pn(1/t)exp(1/t) for every t>0.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Repeatedly applying [L2] on (0,) proves [A1] by a routine induction on n.

L2given
2.1

For each n, both β(n)(t) and β(n)(t)/t are finite linear combinations of terms β(t)/tm, so both tend to 0 as t0+ by [L1] and step 1.1.

L1step 1.1A1
3.1

We prove recursively that β is Cn, that β(n) vanishes on (,0], and that β(n)(0)=0. The case n=0 is [F1]. If the claim holds for n, then the left derivative of β(n) at 0 is 0 because β(n) is zero on (,0], and the right derivative is limt0+β(n)(t)/t=0 by step 2.1. Thus β(n+1)(0) exists and equals 0, and step 2.1 also gives continuity at 0.

F1step 2.1
4.1

Hence β is smooth on R and all of its derivatives vanish at 0.

step 3.1
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The standard smooth step function

Definition

Let β be the standard flat function. The standard smooth step function is σ(t):=β(t)β(t)+β(1t). Because β is smooth and positive on (0,), the denominator is positive on (0,1), while σ(t)=0 for t0 and σ(t)=1 for t1.

Remarks

The function σ is smooth on all of R and takes values in [0,1].

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls

Statement

Let 0<r<R and n1. Then there exists a smooth function ρ:Rn[0,1] such that ρ=1 on Br(0) and supp(ρ)BR(0).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Real numbers 0<r<R.

[F1]

The standard smooth step function σ is smooth, vanishes on (,0], and equals 1 on [1,) (The standard smooth step function).

[A1]

The function q(x):=x2 is smooth on Rn.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define u(x):=(R2x2)/(R2r2) and ρ(x):=σ(u(x)); then u is smooth by [A1] and [L1], so ρ is smooth by [F1] and [L1].

A1F1L1construct
2.1

If xr, then u(x)1, so ρ(x)=1 by [F1]; if xR, then u(x)0, so ρ(x)=0 by [F1].

F1step 1.1
3.1

Thus ρ maps into [0,1], equals 1 on Br(0), and vanishes on RnBR(0), so supp(ρ)BR(0).

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set

Statement

If KURn with K compact and U open, then there exists a smooth function ρ:Rn[0,1] such that ρ=1 on K and supp(ρ)U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact set KRn and an open set UK.

[L1]

For every pK there are radii 0<rp<Rp with Brp(p)BRp(p)U.

[L2]

Each such concentric pair admits a smooth bump equal to 1 on the inner closed ball and supported in the outer ball (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F1]

The standard smooth step function σ is 0 on (,0] and 1 on [1,) (The standard smooth step function).

[A1]

Finite sums of smooth real-valued functions on Rn are smooth.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each pK, choose radii as in [L1] and a bump ρp as in [L2]; compactness gives finitely many points p1,,pm such that Ki=1mBrpi(pi).

L1L2givenchoose
2.1

Put s:=ρp1++ρpm; then s is smooth by [A1], one has s1 on K, and supp(s)U.

A1step 1.1
3.1

Define ρ:=σs; then ρ is smooth, equals 1 on K, and vanishes off U, so supp(ρ)U.

F1step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A chart bump at a point with prescribed support

Statement

Let M be a smooth manifold, let pM, and let WM be open with pW. Then there exists a smooth function ρ:M[0,1] such that ρ(p)=1 and supp(ρ)W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M, a point pM, and an open neighbourhood W of p.

[F1]

Smooth charts are diffeomorphisms onto open subsets of Euclidean space (Chart maps are diffeomorphisms onto Euclidean open sets).

[L1]

Compact sets inside Euclidean open sets admit smooth bumps with prescribed support (A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[L2]

Smooth maps that agree on overlaps paste to a smooth global map, and composites of smooth maps are smooth (Smooth maps paste over an open cover, Identity maps and composites of smooth maps are smooth).

[A1]

Closed bounded subsets of Euclidean space are compact, and compact subsets of the Hausdorff manifold M are closed.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a smooth chart (U,φ) with pU and put a:=φ(p). Choose 0<r<R such that Br(a)BR(a)BR(a)φ(WU). Applying [L1] to Br(a)BR(a) gives a smooth ρ~:Rn[0,1] equal to 1 on Br(a) and supported in BR(a). Its support is compact by [A1].

F1L1A1givenchoose
2.1

Let K:=φ1(supp(ρ~)). By step 1.1, K is a compact, hence closed, subset of WU. On the open cover U(MK), define ρ=ρ~φ on U and ρ=0 on MK. The formulas agree on UK, so [L2] gives a smooth global function.

F1L2A1step 1.1
3.1

One has ρ(p)=ρ~(a)=1, and ρ vanishes outside W, so supp(ρ)W.

step 1.1step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set

Statement

Let M be a smooth manifold, let KM be compact, and let WM be open with KW. Then there exists a smooth function ρ:M[0,1] that equals 1 on an open neighbourhood of K and satisfies supp(ρ)W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact set KM and an open set WM with KW.

[L1]

Every point of K admits a smooth bump supported in W and equal to 1 at that point (A chart bump at a point with prescribed support).

[F1]

The standard smooth step function σ is 0 on (,0] and 1 on [1,) (The standard smooth step function).

[A1]

Finite sums of smooth real-valued functions on a smooth manifold are smooth.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each pK, choose a smooth bump ρp from [L1] with support in W and ρp(p)=1; compactness gives finitely many points p1,,pm such that the open sets Vpi:=ρpi1((1/2,1]) cover K.

L1givenchoose
2.1

Put s:=ρp1++ρpm; then s is smooth by [A1], one has 2s1 on the open neighbourhood Vp1Vpm of K, and supp(s)W.

A1step 1.1
3.1

Define ρ:=σ(2s); then ρ is smooth, equals 1 on an open neighbourhood of K, and vanishes off W, so supp(ρ)W.

F1step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Locally finite supports have locally finite cozero sets

Statement

Let (fi)iI be a family of real-valued functions on a topological space X. If the family of supports (supp(fi))iI is locally finite, then the family of cozero sets ({x:fi(x)0})iI is locally finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A family (fi)iI of real-valued functions on X.

[F1]

A family of subsets is locally finite when every point has a neighbourhood meeting only finitely many members (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements).

[A1]

For each i, the cozero set of fi is contained in supp(fi).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix xX; by [F1], there is a neighbourhood N of x meeting only finitely many supports supp(fi).

F1given
2.1

If N meets the cozero set of fi, then it meets supp(fi) by [A1], so only finitely many cozero sets can meet N.

A1step 1.1
3.1

Since x was arbitrary, the cozero family is locally finite by [F1].

F1step 2.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth

Statement

Let M be a smooth manifold and let (fi)iI be smooth functions fi:MR whose supports form a locally finite family. Then the pointwise sum f:=iIfi is well defined and smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A family (fi)iI of smooth real-valued functions on M whose supports are locally finite.

[L1]

If the supports are locally finite, then the cozero sets are locally finite (Locally finite supports have locally finite cozero sets).

[L2]

Smoothness is local on the source (Smoothness is local on the source).

[A1]

A finite sum of smooth real-valued functions on a smooth manifold is smooth.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix pM; by [L1], there is an open neighbourhood U of p meeting only finitely many cozero sets, say those with indices i1,,im.

L1givenchoose
2.1

On U, the pointwise sum equals the finite sum fi1++fim, so it is well defined and smooth by [A1].

A1step 1.1
3.1

Because every point has such a neighbourhood, [L2] implies that f is smooth on all of M.

L2step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A locally finite positive smooth family normalizes to a partition of unity

Statement

Let (gi)iI be a locally finite family of smooth functions gi:M[0,) on a smooth manifold M, and suppose that for every pM at least one gi(p) is strictly positive. Put G:=igi. Then G is a positive smooth function, each ϕi:=gi/G is smooth, and (ϕi)iI is a partition of unity subordinate to (supp(gi))iI.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A locally finite family (gi)iI of nonnegative smooth functions on M that is pointwise positive.

[L1]

A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

[L2]

If the supports are locally finite, then the cozero sets are locally finite (Locally finite supports have locally finite cozero sets).

[A1]

A positive smooth real-valued function has a smooth reciprocal.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the sum G:=igi is smooth; because the gi are nonnegative and some gi(p) is positive at each point, one has G(p)>0 for all pM.

L1given
2.1

By [A1], the reciprocal 1/G is smooth, so each ϕi=gi(1/G) is smooth and nonnegative; also supp(ϕi)supp(gi).

A1step 1.1
3.1

The family (ϕi) is locally finite by [L2], and iϕi=(1/G)igi=1 pointwise. Therefore (ϕi) is a partition of unity subordinate to (supp(gi)).

L2step 1.1step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover

Definition

Let M be a smooth manifold and let (Ui)iI be an open cover of M. A family of smooth functions (ϕi)iI with ϕi:M[0,1] is a smooth partition of unity subordinate to (Ui)iI when:

  1. the family (supp(ϕi))iI is locally finite;
  2. supp(ϕi)Ui for every iI; and
  3. iϕi(p)=1 for every pM.

Remarks

Because the support family is locally finite, the pointwise sum in (3) is locally a finite sum.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover

Statement

Every open cover of a smooth manifold has a countable cover by coordinate balls with compact closures, each closure contained in one member of the original cover.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M and an open cover U of M.

[L1]

Coordinate balls form a basis of the underlying topological manifold (Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold).

[A1]

By the library convention in Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts, every smooth manifold is second countable.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each pM, choose UpU containing p, then choose a coordinate ball Bp with pBpBpUp by [L1].

L1givenchoose
2.1

The family (Bp)pM is an open cover of M, so [A1] and [L2] give a countable subcover B1,B2,. Each Bn is compact and lies in some member of U by step 1.1.

A1L2step 1.1
3.1

Thus the original cover has a countable subordinate cover by relatively compact coordinate balls.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A countable coordinate-ball cover has a countable locally finite shrinking

Statement

Let (Un)n1 be a countable cover of a smooth manifold M by coordinate balls with compact closures. Then there are countable families of open sets (Wk)k1 and coordinate balls (Vk)k1 such that M=kWk, each WkVkVkUn(k) for some index n(k), and the family (Vk) is locally finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A countable cover (Un)n1 of M by coordinate balls with compact closures.

[L1]

Coordinate balls form a basis of the underlying topological manifold, and the basis balls supplied there have compact closures (Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold).

[A1]

Smooth manifolds are Hausdorff and regular.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put Hr:=i=1rUi for r1. Each Hr is compact, and the interiors of the Hr cover M because Urint(Hr).

givenL3
2.1

Set r1=1. Recursively, compactness of Hrm and the open cover (int(Hr))r1 give an integer rm+1>rm such that Hrmint(Hrm+1). Put Km:=Hrm and K1=K0=. Then Kmint(Km+1) and the interiors of the Km cover M.

step 1.1choose
3.1

Put A1:=K1 and Am:=Kmint(Km1) for m2; each Am is compact by [L3]. Fix xAm, choose some Un containing x, and set Ox:=Unint(Km+1)Km2. By step 2.1, this is an open neighbourhood of x. Apply [L2] to choose an open Rx with xRxRxOx, and then [L1] to choose a coordinate ball Vx with xVxRx and compact closure. Thus VxRxOx. Applying [L2] inside Vx, choose an open set Wx with xWxWxVx. Compactness of Am gives finitely many such pairs covering Am.

L1L2L3step 2.1choose
4.1

Collect the finitely many pairs from each Am into sequences (Wk) and (Vk). They are countable, and they cover M because the annuli Am cover M. Given yM, choose m with yint(Km). If Vk is attached to Aj with jm+3, then step 3.1 gives Vkint(Km)= because Kj2Km. Hence the neighbourhood int(Km) meets only the finitely many families attached to A1,,Am+2. Thus (Vk) is locally finite.

step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Hence (Wk) and (Vk) give the required countable locally finite shrinking.

step 4.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds

Statement

Every open cover of a smooth manifold admits a smooth partition of unity subordinate to it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M and an open cover U of M.

[L1]

The cover has a countable subordinate cover by relatively compact coordinate balls (Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover).

[L2]

Such a countable cover has a countable locally finite shrinking WkVkUn(k) (A countable coordinate-ball cover has a countable locally finite shrinking).

[L3]

For every compact set inside an open set there is a smooth manifold bump equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of that compact set and supported in the open set (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[L4]

A locally finite nonnegative smooth family that is pointwise positive normalizes to a partition of unity (A locally finite positive smooth family normalizes to a partition of unity).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] and then [L2] to obtain countably many open sets Wk and coordinate balls Vk such that M=kWk, the family (Vk) is locally finite, and each Vk lies in some member Un(k) of U.

L1L2given
2.1

For each k, apply [L3] to the compact set WkVk to obtain a smooth function gk:M[0,1] that equals 1 on a neighbourhood of Wk and is supported in Vk. The family (gk) is locally finite and pointwise positive because every point lies in some Wk.

L3step 1.1choose
3.1

Normalize (gk) by [L4]; the resulting family (ϕk) is a smooth partition of unity, and supp(ϕk)VkUn(k) for every k.

L4step 2.1
4.1

Hence (ϕk) is subordinate to U in the sense of Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover.

step 3.1
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth partitions subordinate to a countable coordinate cover

Statement

Every countable cover of a smooth manifold by coordinate balls admits a smooth partition of unity subordinate to that cover.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A countable coordinate-ball cover of a smooth manifold.

[L1]

Every open cover of a smooth manifold admits a subordinate smooth partition of unity (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A countable coordinate-ball cover is an open cover.

given
2.1

Apply [L1] to that open cover.

L1step 1.1
3.1

The resulting partition is subordinate to the given countable coordinate-ball cover.

step 2.1
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth and topological partition theorems have different proof costs

The smooth theorem Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds is proved here through chart-level bumps, a countable locally finite shrinking, and normalization of a positive smooth family. The published topological theorem Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity proves a broader continuous statement with a different proof cost and a different choice budget, so this page records it only for comparison and not as a black-box substitute.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A smooth Urysohn lemma for a closed set in an open set

Statement

Let A be a closed subset of a smooth manifold M, and let UM be open with AU. Then there exists a smooth function f:M[0,1] such that f=1 on an open neighbourhood of A and supp(f)U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed set AM and an open set UM with AU.

[L1]

Every open cover of a smooth manifold admits a subordinate smooth partition of unity (Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds).

[F1]

In a partition of unity subordinate to an open cover, each support lies in its assigned open set and the functions sum to 1 pointwise (Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The two open sets U and MA cover M, so [L1] gives smooth functions ϕU,ϕA:M[0,1] subordinate to this cover with ϕU+ϕA=1.

L1givenchoose
2.1

Because supp(ϕA)MA, the function ϕA vanishes on an open neighbourhood of A; hence ϕU=1 there, and supp(ϕU)U by [F1].

F1step 1.1
3.1

Taking f:=ϕU yields the required smooth function.

step 2.1
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth functions separate points from closed sets

Statement

Let A be a closed subset of a smooth manifold M and let pMA. Then there exists a smooth function f:M[0,1] such that f(p)=1 and fA=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed set AM and a point pMA.

[L1]

A closed set inside an open set admits a smooth cutoff equal to 1 near the closed set and supported in the open set (A smooth Urysohn lemma for a closed set in an open set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The singleton {p} is closed and lies in the open set MA.

given
2.1

Apply [L1] to the closed set {p}MA; the resulting function is 1 at p and vanishes on A because its support lies in MA.

L1step 1.1
3.1

This is the required separating smooth function.

step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth extension from a closed neighbourhood

Statement

Let C be a closed subset of a smooth manifold M, let UM be open with CU, and let f:UR be smooth. Then there exists a smooth function F:MR such that F=f on an open neighbourhood of C and supp(F)U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed set CM, an open set UM containing C, and a smooth function f:UR.

[L1]

There is a smooth cutoff χ:M[0,1] equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of C and supported in U (A smooth Urysohn lemma for a closed set in an open set).

[L2]

Smooth maps paste over an open cover (Smooth maps paste over an open cover).

[A1]

Products of smooth real-valued functions on the same open set are smooth.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let χ be as in [L1]; then χf is smooth on U by [A1] and equals f on an open neighbourhood of C because χ=1 there.

L1A1given
2.1

Since supp(χ)U, the function χ vanishes on an open neighbourhood of MU, so the local formula χf on U agrees with the constant zero map on an open neighbourhood of every boundary point of U.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Pasting these two local formulas by [L2] yields a smooth function F:MR with F=f near C and supp(F)U.

L2step 1.1step 2.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Smooth locally defined functions can be glued by a partition of unity

Statement

Let (Ui)iI be an open cover of a smooth manifold M, let fi:UiR be smooth for each i, and let (ϕi)iI be a smooth partition of unity subordinate to (Ui). Then the pointwise formula F(p):=iϕi(p)fi(p) defines a smooth function F:MR.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open cover (Ui)iI of M, smooth functions fi:UiR, and a smooth partition of unity (ϕi)iI subordinate to (Ui).

[F1]

In a smooth partition of unity subordinate to (Ui), the support family (supp(ϕi)) is locally finite and each support lies in Ui (Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover).

[L1]

Smooth maps paste over an open cover (Smooth maps paste over an open cover).

[L2]

A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

[A1]

For each i, the product ϕifi is smooth on Ui.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix iI. On the open set Ui let Gi:=ϕifi, and on the open set Msupp(ϕi) let Hi:=0. By [A1], the map Gi is smooth on Ui; by [F1], the two open sets cover M and on the overlap Uisupp(ϕi) one has ϕi=0, so Gi=Hi. Therefore [L1] pastes them to a smooth global function Fi:MR with Fi=ϕifi on Ui and supp(Fi)supp(ϕi).

F1L1A1givenconstruct
2.1

By [F1] and step 1.1, the family (supp(Fi))iI is locally finite. Hence the sum F:=iFi is well defined and smooth by [L2].

F1L2step 1.1
3.1

Let pM. If ϕi(p)0, then pUi and step 1.1 gives Fi(p)=ϕi(p)fi(p). If ϕi(p)=0, then psupp(ϕi), so step 1.1 gives Fi(p)=0=ϕi(p)fi(p). Thus F(p)=iϕi(p)fi(p), and this pointwise formula is smooth by step 2.1.

F1step 1.1step 2.1
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Compact exhaustions of a manifold

Definition

A compact exhaustion of a manifold M is a sequence (Kn)n1 of compact subsets such that Knint(Kn+1) for every n1 and M=n1Kn.

Remarks

The interior condition is what makes the exhaustion useful for local constructions.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every manifold has a compact exhaustion

Statement

Every smooth manifold admits a compact exhaustion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M.

[L1]

The manifold has a countable cover by relatively compact coordinate balls U1,U2, (Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover).

[A1]

A compact subset of a space covered by open sets has a finite subcover.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Start from the countable cover U1,U2, of [L1]. Recursively choose integers 1m1<m2< such that U1im1Ui and, for each k1, the compact set imkUi is contained in imk+1Ui; this is possible by [A1].

L1A1choose
2.1

Put Kk:=imkUi. Each Kk is compact, step 1.1 gives Kkint(Kk+1), and every point of M lies in some Kk because the Ui cover M.

step 1.1
3.1

Therefore (Kk) is a compact exhaustion in the sense of Compact exhaustions of a manifold.

step 2.1
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function

Statement

Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper function h:M[0,).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M.

[L1]

The manifold admits a compact exhaustion (Kn)n1 (Every manifold has a compact exhaustion).

[L2]

Closed sets inside open sets admit smooth cutoffs equal to 1 near the closed set and supported in the open set (A smooth Urysohn lemma for a closed set in an open set).

[L3]

Locally finite sums of smooth functions are smooth (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

[A1]

Closed subsets of compact spaces are compact.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let (Kn) be the exhaustion from [L1], and set K0=K1=. For each n1, apply [L2] to An:=Knint(Kn1) inside the open set int(Kn+1)Kn2 to obtain a smooth function ρn:M[0,1] equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of An and supported in int(Kn+1)Kn2.

L1L2choose
2.1

The supports of (ρn) are locally finite. Indeed, if xAm:=Kmint(Km1), then supp(ρn)int(Kn+1)Kn2 from step 1.1. If nm3, then int(Kn+1)int(Km2)int(Km1), so xsupp(ρn). If nm+3, then Kn2Km+1Km, so again xsupp(ρn). Thus only ρm2,ρm1,ρm,ρm+1,ρm+2 can be nonzero at x. Therefore h:=n1nρn is a smooth nonnegative function by [L3].

L3step 1.1algebra
3.1

If c0 and N>c, then any point xKN lies in some annulus An with n>N, so ρn(x)=1 and hence h(x)n>N>c. Thus {x:h(x)c}KN, and this sublevel set is compact by [A1].

A1step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Every closed sublevel set of h is compact, so h is proper.

step 3.1
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every closed subset of a manifold is the zero set of a smooth nonnegative function

Statement

Every closed subset A of a smooth manifold M is the zero set of some smooth nonnegative function g:M[0,).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed subset A of a smooth manifold M.

[L1]

Every open cover of a manifold has a countable cover by relatively compact coordinate balls subordinate to it (Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover).

[L2]

A countable cover by coordinate balls with compact closures has a countable locally finite shrinking WkVk (A countable coordinate-ball cover has a countable locally finite shrinking).

[L3]

For every compact set inside an open set there is a smooth manifold bump equal to 1 near that compact set and supported in the open set (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[L4]

A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] to the one-set open cover {MA} of the open manifold MA to obtain a countable cover by coordinate balls with compact closures contained in MA. Then apply [L2] to obtain a countable locally finite shrinking WkVk of that cover. For each k, apply [L3] to WkVk to obtain a smooth function bk:M[0,1] that is positive on Wk and supported in MA.

L1L2L3givenchoose
2.1

The family (bk) is locally finite, so g:=k12kbk is smooth and nonnegative by [L4]. One has g=0 on A because every bk vanishes there, and g>0 on MA because each point there lies in some Wk.

L4step 1.1
3.1

Therefore A=g1(0).

step 2.1
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every open subset of a manifold is the cozero set of a smooth function

Statement

Every open subset U of a smooth manifold M is the cozero set of a smooth function on M.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set UM.

[L1]

Every closed subset of a manifold is the zero set of a smooth nonnegative function (Every closed subset of a manifold is the zero set of a smooth nonnegative function).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The complement A:=MU is closed.

given
2.1

By [L1], there is a smooth nonnegative function g with A=g1(0), so U={x:g(x)0}.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Hence U is a smooth cozero set.

step 2.1
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Every smooth manifold admits a countable smooth atlas with relatively compact domains

Statement

Every smooth manifold admits a countable smooth atlas whose chart domains have compact closures.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth manifold M.

[L1]

The trivial open cover {M} has a countable subordinate cover by relatively compact coordinate balls (Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover).

[F1]

A smooth atlas is a cover by pairwise smoothly compatible smooth charts (Smooth atlases).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], there are countably many coordinate balls B1,B2, covering M, each with compact closure.

L1given
2.1

Each Bn carries its inherited smooth chart, and these charts are pairwise compatible because they come from the smooth structure of M. Thus they form a countable smooth atlas by [F1].

F1step 1.1
3.1

This is the required countable smooth atlas.

step 2.1
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

The piecewise exponential flat function is not analytic at zero

Statement

False claim: the standard flat function is analytic at 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard flat function β.

[F1]

For t>0, one has β(t)=exp(1/t)>0, while β(t)=0 for t0 (The standard flat function).

[L1]

Every derivative of β at 0 is equal to 0 (The standard flat function is smooth and flat at zero).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the Taylor series of β at 0 is the zero series.

L1
1.2

By [F1], the function β is positive on every punctured right neighbourhood of 0, so it is not equal near 0 to its zero Taylor series.

F1
2.1

Therefore β is not analytic at 0.

step 1.1step 1.2
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A continuous partition of unity need not be smooth

Statement

False claim: every continuous partition of unity on a smooth manifold is smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cover U=(,1) and V=(1,) of R.

[F1]

A partition of unity subordinate to an open cover consists of nonnegative functions summing to 1 with supports in the assigned open sets (Smooth partitions of unity subordinate to an open cover).

[A1]

Define ϕ(x):=0 for x1, ϕ(x):=(x+1)/2 for 1x1, ϕ(x):=1 for x1, and ψ:=1ϕ.

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

The functions from [A1] are continuous, nonnegative, and satisfy ϕ+ψ=1; also supp(ϕ)=[1,)V and supp(ψ)=(,1]U, so they form a continuous subordinate partition in the sense of [F1].

A1F1
1.2

The function ϕ has a corner at 1 and at 1, so it is not smooth.

A1
2.1

Hence a continuous partition of unity need not be smooth.

step 1.1step 1.2
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A pointwise-defined sum of smooth functions need not be smooth

Statement

False claim: whenever nfn(x) is pointwise defined and each fn is smooth, the sum is automatically smooth.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth bump η:R[0,1] supported in [1,1] with η(0)=1, and fn(x):=η(n2(x1/n)) for n1.

[L1]

Local finiteness, not mere pointwise definability, is the hypothesis that forces a smooth sum (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

For each fixed x, only finitely many of the values fn(x) are nonzero, so F(x):=n1fn(x) is pointwise defined; moreover F(0)=0 and F(1/n)1 for every n1.

given
2.1

The sequence 1/n0 but F(1/n)↛F(0), so F is not continuous at 0 and therefore not smooth.

step 1.1
3.1

This refutes the claim and shows why [L1] needs local finiteness.

L1step 2.1
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Naive extension by zero from an open set need not be smooth

Statement

False claim: if a smooth function is defined on an open set containing a closed set, then declaring it to be zero outside that open set always gives a smooth global extension.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set (0,)R and the smooth function f(x)=1 on it.

[L1]

Smooth extension requires a cutoff supported away from the boundary of the original open set (Smooth extension from a closed neighbourhood).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

The naive zero extension is F(x):=1 for x>0 and F(x):=0 for x0.

given
2.1

This function has a jump at 0, so it is not smooth.

step 1.1
3.1

Therefore the cutoff in [L1] is genuinely necessary.

L1step 2.1
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-30Open item page →

A smooth manifold need not be compact

Statement

False claim: every smooth manifold is compact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth manifold R.

[F1]

Open subsets of Euclidean space with their standard smooth structure are smooth manifolds (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

[A1]

The open cover (n,n), n1, of R has no finite subcover.

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1], the real line is a smooth manifold.

F1
1.2

By [A1], the real line is not compact.

A1
2.1

Hence the claim is false.

step 1.1step 1.2
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-30Open item page →

Weighted sums do not glue arbitrary manifold-valued maps

Statement

False claim: a partition of unity can glue arbitrary manifold-valued maps by weighted sums of their values.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The target manifold S1R2, the two-member cover U=V=R, the subordinate smooth partition ϕU=ϕV=1/2, and the constant maps fU(1,0) and fV(1,0).

[L1]

Partition-of-unity gluing works for real-valued functions because addition and scalar multiplication are available in the target (Smooth locally defined functions can be glued by a partition of unity).

[A1]

On the overlap UV=R, the partition weights are 1/2 and 1/2.

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

On the overlap, the weighted sum would be (1/2)fU+(1/2)fV=(0,0).

A1given
2.1

The point (0,0) does not lie on S1, so the weighted sum leaves the manifold target.

step 1.1
3.1

Thus the affine argument from [L1] does not extend to arbitrary manifold-valued maps.

L1step 2.1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources