How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth manifold need not be compact
Statement
False claim: every smooth manifold is compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth manifold .
Open subsets of Euclidean space with their standard smooth structure are smooth manifolds (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).
The open cover , , of has no finite subcover.
Refutation
By [F1], the real line is a smooth manifold.
By [A1], the real line is not compact.
Hence the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)