How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A pointwise-defined sum of smooth functions need not be smooth
Statement
False claim: whenever is pointwise defined and each is smooth, the sum is automatically smooth.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth bump supported in with , and for .
Local finiteness, not mere pointwise definability, is the hypothesis that forces a smooth sum (A locally finite sum of smooth functions is smooth).
Refutation
For each fixed , only finitely many of the values are nonzero, so is pointwise defined; moreover and for every .
The sequence but , so is not continuous at and therefore not smooth.
This refutes the claim and shows why [L1] needs local finiteness.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)