Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 21 results · all verified · 20 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.
1 · Prerequisites
Real Analysis
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- Topology of ℝ
Set Theory
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements
Lemma
Locally finite families remain locally finite after taking closures, closure commutes with their union, and a locally finite union of closed sets is closed
Definition
Paracompactness: every open cover has a locally finite open refinement, with no separation axiom built into the word
Proposition
Every compact space is paracompact
Proposition
Every closed subspace of a paracompact space is paracompact
Lemma
Every paracompact Hausdorff space is regular
Theorem
Every paracompact Hausdorff space is normal
Definition
Locally finite partitions of unity and subordination to an open cover
Lemma
Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined
Lemma
A locally finite family of continuous nonnegative functions has a continuous pointwise sum
Lemma
A locally finite nonnegative family with positive pointwise sum normalizes to a partition of unity
Lemma
Under choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space has locally finite open refinements {Vₛ} and {Wₛ} with Vₛ⊆ Wₛ subseteqWₛ⊆ Uₛ
Theorem
Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity
Theorem
For a Hausdorff space, paracompactness is equivalent, under choice and dependent choice, to the existence of a locally finite subordinate partition of unity for every open cover
Corollary
Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space admits a finite subordinate partition of unity
Lemma
Under choice, every open cover of a metric space has a point-finite open refinement
Lemma
Under choice, Ornstein's second construction turns a point-finite metric open cover into a locally finite open refinement
Theorem
Stone's theorem, under choice: every metric space is paracompact
Corollary
Under choice and dependent choice, metric open covers admit locally finite subordinate partitions of unity
Lemma
Assuming countable choice, every countably compact paracompact Hausdorff space is compact
Lemma
Under countable choice, every regular Lindelöf space is paracompact
False statement
Refuted: every paracompact space is normal
False statement
Assuming choice, refuted: paracompactness is hereditary
False statement
Assuming choice, refuted: paracompactness is productive
Remark
Choice and convention ledger for paracompactness, Stone's theorem, and partitions of unity
Sources
- J. Robbin, Partitions of Unity
- Dartmouth Point-Set Topology, Lecture 25
- R. Gardner, Notes on Munkres Section 41: Paracompactness (East Tennessee State University)
- Paracompact space (Wikipedia)
- S. Semmes, Topology notes, Sections 5.13–5.14 (Rice University)
- Topology 262 notes (California State University, Northridge)
- Continuity notes (University of California, Berkeley)
- General Topology notes (University of Göttingen)
- D. Ornstein, A New Proof of the Paracompactness of Metric Spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1969), 341–342
- C. Good, I. J. Tree and W. S. Watson, On Stone's theorem and the axiom of choice
- P. Bacon, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 32 (1970), countably compact paracompact spaces
- First uncountable ordinal (Wikipedia)
- G. Gruenhage, General Topology Course Notes
- M. Aitken, Compactness notes (California State University San Marcos)
- G. Gruenhage, General Topology Course Notes, Sorgenfrey plane and Jones's lemma
- Sorgenfrey topology (Encyclopedia of Mathematics)