How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The lower-limit line has a clopen basis, is regular, and is Lindelöf under countable choice
Statement
The lower-limit line has a basis of clopen sets and is regular. Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, it is Lindelöf.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The lower-limit line and, for the Lindelöf assertion, the Axiom of Countable Choice.
Its basic open sets are the intervals (The lower-limit topology on , with the half-open intervals as a basis).
A clopen neighbourhood basis gives regularity through the closed-neighbourhood characterization (A space is regular if and only if every point has a neighbourhood base of closed neighbourhoods, if and only if open gives an open with ).
is countably infinite and is dense in ( is countably infinite, The rationals embed densely in the reals).
The Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Lindelöf means that every open cover has an at most countable subcover (Countably compact, Lindel"of, sequentially compact, limit point compact and -compact spaces, and relatively compact subsets).
Proof
Each is clopen: its complement is , a union of lower-limit basic intervals. Hence the line is regular by [L1].
Let be an open cover and let be the union of the usual intervals for which lies in a member of . The rational-endpoint intervals contained in members of cover ; they form an at most countable family by [L2].
Put . For , some lies in a member of , and . The first rational in a fixed enumeration exists, and the intervals are pairwise disjoint; their first rationals are therefore distinct. Thus injects into , so is at most countable.
By [A1], choose one member of covering each point of the at most countable set . Together with one covering member for each rational-endpoint interval used in step 1.2, these form an at most countable subcover of .
Therefore the lower-limit line is Lindelöf under countable choice.
Depends on
- The lower-limit topology on $\mathbb{R}$, with the half-open intervals $[a,b)$ as a basis
- A space is regular if and only if every point has a neighbourhood base of closed neighbourhoods, if and only if $x \in U$ open gives an open $V$ with $x \in V \subseteq \overline{V} \subseteq U$
- Countably compact, Lindel\"of, sequentially compact, limit point compact and $\sigma$-compact spaces, and relatively compact subsets
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is countably infinite
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- Assuming countable choice, the lower-limit line is normal Corollary
- Assuming choice, two paracompact lower-limit lines can have a nonparacompact product Counterexample
- For the lower-limit line, χ=d=L=c=ℵ₀ and w=2^ℵ₀ under choice Example
- Under choice, the lower-limit line is regular and separable but not second countable and therefore not metrizable Example
- Assuming choice, refuted: paracompactness is productive False statement
- FALSE: every regular space is metrizable False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 123 results over 33 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- L. A. Steen and J. A. Seebach, Counterexamples in Topology, Sorgenfrey line (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sorgenfrey topology (Encyclopedia of Mathematics) (standard reference, not scraped)