TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Dependent Choice. Every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite partition of unity subordinate to it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Choice, dependent choice, a paracompact Hausdorff space $X$ , and an open cover $\mathcal U$ .

[L1]

There are locally finite covers $\{V_s\}$ , $\{W_s\}$ and $U_s\in\mathcal U$ with $\overline{V_s}\subseteq W_s\subseteq\overline{W_s}\subseteq U_s$ (Under choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space has locally finite open refinements $\{V_s\}$ and $\{W_s\}$ with $\overline{V_s}\subseteq W_s\subseteq\overline{W_s}\subseteq U_s$ ).

[L2]

Every paracompact Hausdorff space is normal (Every paracompact Hausdorff space is normal).

[L3]

Under dependent choice, Urysohn's lemma separates disjoint closed sets in a normal space by a continuous map into $[0,1]$ (Urysohn's lemma, under the axiom of dependent choice: in a normal space two disjoint closed sets are separated by a continuous function into $[0,1]$ , and conversely such a space is normal, clause 1).

[L4]

If $\{f_s:X\to[0,\infty)\}_{s\in S}$ is a continuous family with locally finite cozero family and everywhere-positive sum $f=\sum_sf_s$ , then the functions $\varphi_s=f_s/f$ form a partition of unity, with the same cozero sets and supports as the corresponding $f_s$ (A locally finite nonnegative family with positive pointwise sum normalizes to a partition of unity).

Proof

technique · constructive

1.1

Apply [L1] to obtain $V_s,W_s,U_s$ as stated.

L1construct

2.1

By [L2], $X$ is normal. For each $s$ , the closed sets $\overline{V_s}$ and $X\setminus W_s$ are disjoint, so [L3] gives a continuous $f_s:X\to[0,1]$ equal to $1$ on $\overline{V_s}$ and $0$ on $X\setminus W_s$ .

step 1.1L2L3choose

3.1

The cozero set of $f_s$ lies in $W_s$ , while its support lies in $\overline{W_s}\subseteq U_s$ ; since $\{W_s\}$ is locally finite, so is the cozero family.

step 1.1step 2.1

3.2

Because $\{V_s\}$ covers $X$ and $f_s=1$ on $V_s$ , the pointwise sum $\sum_sf_s$ is positive everywhere.

step 1.1step 2.1

4.1

By [L4], the normalized functions $\varphi_s=f_s/(\sum_tf_t)$ form a locally finite partition of unity; their supports equal those of $f_s$ , so step 3.1 makes the partition subordinate to $\mathcal U$ .

step 3.1step 3.2L4discharge-construct∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 88 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

Dartmouth Point-Set Topology, Lecture 25 (standard reference, not scraped)
J. Robbin, Partitions of Unity (standard reference, not scraped)
Topology 262 notes (California State University, Northridge) (standard reference, not scraped)
R. Gardner, Notes on Munkres Section 41: Paracompactness (East Tennessee State University) (standard reference, not scraped)