Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Integral complex projective bundle theorem

Statement

Assume AC. Let EB be a numerable complex rank-n bundle with n1 over a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW complex B, let p:P(E)B be its projective bundle and let x=xEH2(P(E);Z) be the class of the tautological line. For R=Z and for every field Fp the cohomology H(P(E);R) is a free H(B;R)-module with basis 1,xR,xR2,,xRn1, where xR is the coefficient reduction of x and the module structure is ab=pab.

Integrally the expansion of xn in this basis is unique: there are unique classes aiH2i(B;Z), 1in, with xna1xn1+a2xn2+(1)nan=0in H2n(P(E);Z), and this monic relation generates every polynomial relation: if PH(B;Z)[t] satisfies P(x)=0, then P is divisible by tna1tn1++(1)nan in H(B;Z)[t].

The same statements hold for a base that is a paracompact Hausdorff CGWH space of CW homotopy type, in particular for the total spaces of projective bundles occurring in the iterated construction below. Here the projective quotient, tautological line and its complex-oriented Euler class use the same formulas; their validity on these bases is established in step 1.3. Polynomial variables are central of degree two, and coefficients are pulled back along p.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited by the numerable-bundle, Leray-Hirsch and Euler-class suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

The projective bundle P(E) uses the same base trivializing cover as E, has fiber CPn1 and tautological line γE, and x=e((γE)R) (Complex projective bundle and tautological complex line). A bundle atlas is numerable when its cover has a subordinate partition of unity (Locally finite partitions of unity and subordination to an open cover).

[F2]

On every fiber the restrictions of 1,x,,xn1 are a Z-basis of the fiber cohomology, and their reductions are an Fp-basis (The complex tautological Euler class restricts to the projective-fiber generator).

[F3]

Leray-Hirsch: for a Serre fibration over a path-connected CW complex whose finitely many specified classes restrict to an R-basis on every fiber, the map iHei(B;R)H(E;R), (ai)ipaiei, is an H(B;R)-module isomorphism, natural in maps of such fibrations (Leray–Hirsch module isomorphism).

[F4]

Every numerable fiber bundle is a Hurewicz fibration, hence a Serre fibration, under AC (Numerable fiber bundles are hurewicz fibrations).

[F5]

Totals of numerable bundles with compact Hausdorff fiber over a paracompact Hausdorff base are paracompact Hausdorff; when the base is CGWH the total is CGWH, and when base and fiber have CW homotopy type the total has CW homotopy type (Compact-fibre bundle totals preserve paracompactness, and CW type under CW-type hypotheses).

[F6]

Homotopic maps induce equal cohomology maps (Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology).

[F7]

Under AC, which implies DC, a paracompact Hausdorff chart cover admits a subordinate partition of unity (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity). The zero-section Thom composite defines the Euler class on the general Thom scope (Euler class by zero-section pullback of the Thom class), and it is natural for oriented pullbacks in that scope (Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes).

[F8]

Pullbacks preserve Serre fibrations; their homotopy long exact sequences are natural, including the component tail (Pullbacks of fibrations are fibrations, Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration, Fibration sequence is natural).

[F9]

A weak homotopy equivalence induces integral homology isomorphisms; the natural cohomological universal coefficient exact sequence and the module five lemma then give cohomology isomorphisms for every constant abelian coefficient group (Weak homotopy equivalences induce integral homology isomorphisms without choice, The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID, The Five Lemma for modules).

[F10]

Singular cohomology is graded-commutative, so every even-degree class is central (Singular cohomology is graded commutative).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, a numerable complex rank-n bundle EB with n1 over a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW complex B, and a coefficient ring R equal to Z or a field Fp.

1.1

Since E is numerable, choose a subordinate partition of unity on a vector-bundle trivializing cover. By [F1] that same cover and the same partition trivialize and numerate P(E)B, whose fiber CPn1 is compact Hausdorff. Thus [F4] makes p a Hurewicz, hence Serre, fibration over the path-connected CW complex B.

F1F4given
1.2

By [F2] the classes 1,xR,,xRn1 restrict on every fiber to an R-basis of H(CPn1;R): for R=Z directly, and for R=Fp through the coefficient reductions.

F2given
1.3

Construction on bases of CW type. Let B be paracompact Hausdorff CGWH of CW type. Projectivizing the given linear charts and their transitions produces a fiber bundle with the same numeration, by exactly the quotient-chart maps in [F1]. By [F5] its total space T=P(E) is paracompact Hausdorff, CGWH, and of CW type. On each projective coordinate domain vj0, the representative with vj=1 trivializes the tautological line; [F7] numerates this chart cover. The real frames (v,iv) agree in orientation because multiplication by a+ib0 has determinant a2+b2>0. Thus the real rank-two tautological bundle is oriented, numerable and in Thom scope, so [F7] defines x on T. Its restriction on each fiber is the tautological Euler class by oriented naturality, and applying [F2] to the trivial rank-n bundle over a point gives the required integral and prime-field fiber bases.

F1F2F5F7
1.4

Choose a homotopy equivalence w:WB with W a CW complex and form TW=wT with projection q:TWT. Both bundle projections are Serre fibrations by [F4] and [F8]. In their natural homotopy sequences, the fiber map is the identity on CPn1 and the base maps induce isomorphisms. Hence q induces isomorphisms on every positive homotopy group. Explicitly, for surjectivity of the middle map, lift a base class through the base isomorphism; its boundary vanishes by injectivity on the fiber group, so exactness lifts it to the source total group. Correct the difference from the target class using surjectivity on the fiber group. For injectivity, an element killed in the target has zero base image, hence comes from a fiber element. That fiber element maps to a base boundary in the target; lift that boundary class through the base isomorphism and use injectivity on the fiber group to conclude that the original element is zero. This group argument also works in degree one with multiplication in place of addition: the fiber is path connected, so both boundary maps to its component set vanish. Path lifting and path-connected fibers identify the components of each total space with those of its base, giving a bijection on components as well. Thus q is a weak homotopy equivalence. By [F9], q is a cohomology isomorphism with coefficients Z or Fp; its ring structure is preserved by pullback.

F4F8F9algebra
2.1

Applying [F3] to the fibration of step 1.1 with the classes of step 1.2 gives the H(B;R)-module isomorphism i=0n1H2i(B;R)H(P(E);R) sending (ai) to ipaixRi. In particular 1,xR,,xRn1 are a basis of the free module H(P(E);R) over H(B;R).

F3step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

The monic relation. Apply step 2.1 with R=Z to the element xnH2n(P(E);Z): there are unique classes biH2n2i(B;Z), 0in1, with xn=i=0n1bixi; setting aj:=(1)j+1bnj for 1jn turns this into xna1xn1+a2xn2+(1)nan=0, with ajH2j(B;Z) by the grading. Uniqueness of the aj is uniqueness of the coefficients bi in the basis of step 2.1.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

All relations. Let f(t)=tna1tn1++(1)nanH(B;Z)[t] and let PH(B;Z)[t] satisfy P(x)=0. All coefficients of f and the degree-two variable are central by [F10]. Successively subtracting the leading coefficient times the appropriate power of t times f reduces the degree, over this possibly noncommutative coefficient ring. Thus monic division gives P=Qf+R with degR<n, and evaluating at x gives R(x)=0, say R(t)=i<nriti with riH(B;Z); then iprixi=0 in H(P(E);Z). By the basis property of step 2.1 all ri=0, so R=0 and P=Qf lies in the ideal generated by f.

F10step 2.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Apply [F3] on each CW component of W with the classes q(xRi). Their restrictions form the bases proved in step 1.3; no Euler construction on W is needed here. The natural square of cup-product maps has vertical isomorphisms w (by [F6]) and q (by step 1.4), so the module map for B is an isomorphism. For disconnected W, singular cohomology is the product of component cohomologies in each degree: singular simplices lie in a single component. The finite direct sum indexed by 0i<n commutes with this product. Therefore the same module map is an isomorphism without connectedness. Steps 3.1 and 4.1 apply to this module map and give the monic relation and its full relation ideal on B.

F3F6step 3.1step 4.1step 1.3step 1.4
6.1

Boundary cases. For n1 the basis 1,x,,xn1 is nonempty and begins with the unit 1; in the rank-one case n=1 the module is H(B;R) itself and the relation reads xa1=0, so a1=x and no higher ai occurs. The zero bundle is excluded by n1, an empty base gives the unique zero cohomology groups; a disconnected base is handled by step 5.1, and the coefficient rings Z and Fp are nonzero by hypothesis. The relation has leading term xn and constant term (1)nan, with all intermediate coefficients verified in step 3.1; the ring H(B;Z)[t] admits monic division by the leading-term subtraction of step 4.1 with central even coefficients, so no domain hypothesis is used. AC is inherited through [A1] in the numerable-fibration, Thom, partition, Leray–Hirsch and coefficient suppliers.

A1F1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Source notes

Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory section 3.1, printed pp. 77-82, proves this theorem with the Leray-Hirsch theorem: H(P(E);Z) is free on 1,x,,xn1 and the defining relation of the Chern classes is the unique monic relation. The statement of the module isomorphism and the generation of all relations by monic division follow the same source. The coefficientwise Fp version is Hatcher's coefficient-independence argument together with the universal coefficient theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources