How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Singular cohomology is graded commutative
Statement
Let be a space, a commutative unital ring, and , with . Then The defining cochain operation need not be graded commutative. No AC is required.
Facts & Assumptions
Factor reversal gives the commutativity chain homotopy supplies with , where .
Singular cohomology ring defines multiplication by taking the class of the front/back cup of representative cocycles.
Proof
Given: Cocycles representing . On the tensor complex define in bidegree and zero in other bidegrees of total degree .
The functional is -balanced by commutativity. On tensors of bidegree , ; on tensors of bidegree , . All other bidegrees contribute zero. Thus . Evaluating [F1]'s identity yields The right side is an explicit coboundary, with degree- primitive.
The functional is . In , only the original diagonal cut of bidegree contributes, and its value is . Commutativity in identifies this with . Step 1.1 and [F2] therefore give the asserted equality of classes.
If , the primitive in step 1.1 has negative degree and is zero; the two cochains agree by ordinary commutativity in . If just one degree is zero, the sign is positive and the same homotopy calculation applies. Empty spaces, zero classes and the zero ring give zero products. All formulas include points and degenerate simplices. Only the two given cocycle representatives and the specified homotopy are used, so no choice principle is invoked.
Depends on
Used by
- Poincaré duality gives a nonsingular cup pairing Corollary
- Cochain cup product is not strictly graded commutative Counterexample
- Cup length over a coefficient ring Definition
- The intersection form on the homology of a closed oriented surface Definition
- Integral cohomology ring of a closed orientable surface Example
- Integral surface cup pairing from the oriented polygon Lemma
- Modification preserves open cohomology images Lemma
- Orientation coefficients are deck eigenspaces, with product and duality pairings Lemma
- Rational cohomology of K(Z,n) through weak CW fiber comparison Lemma
- Relative degree-four cup products are symmetric Lemma
- The completed fourfold-graded cohomology ring is natural and satisfies the ring laws Lemma
- The middle-dimensional intersection form is symmetric and nondegenerate Lemma
- The normal Pontryagin class is the rational inverse of the tangent Pontryagin class Lemma
- The normal Stiefel-Whitney class is the multiplicative inverse of the tangent class Lemma
- The restriction image on a cobordism boundary is Lagrangian Lemma
- Cohomological Kunneth cross product is a ring isomorphism Theorem
- Integral complex projective bundle theorem Theorem
- Mod-two real projective bundle theorem Theorem
- Naturality, orientation sign, and Whitney product for Euler classes Theorem
- Naturality, stability, and mod-two reduction of Pontryagin classes Theorem
- Rational cohomology of BO and BSO by Pontryagin and Euler classes Theorem
- The de Rham theorem Theorem
- The geometric intersection number is the Poincare-dual cup pairing Theorem
- Thom identity for Stiefel–Whitney classes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher Theorem 3.11; Miller Lecture 29 (standard reference, not scraped)