How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback
Statement
Assume AC. Let be paracompact Hausdorff and let be a homotopy from to . For every numerable finite-rank real or complex vector bundle , the endpoint pullbacks and are isomorphic. Equivalently, the restrictions of to and are isomorphic. No canonical endpoint isomorphism is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, as in the statement, and .
Pullback charts make a vector bundle, and its endpoint restrictions are and (Pullback vector bundles and sections).
Under AC and DC a paracompact Hausdorff open cover admits a subordinate locally finite partition (Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity).
The countabilization in the proof of Numerable principal bundles are classified by maps to BG turns an arbitrary numeration into a countable partition such that each cozero set is a disjoint union of open pieces subordinate to the original cover.
AC is the stated principle and implies DC (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies the dependent-choice instances used in vector-bundle constructions).
Proof
For each , compactness of gives a partition and neighborhoods of such that is trivial on . After shrinking to , modify each later strip trivialization by its transition matrix at the common endpoint; consecutive trivializations then agree there and paste. Thus is trivial.
Apply [A1] and [F2] to the cover . Apply the countabilization [F3] to obtain a countable open cover and a locally finite partition with , where each is a disjoint union of open sets contained in members of the original cover. Pasting the corresponding trivializations over those disjoint pieces makes trivial.
Put , , and let be the graph of . Over , its chosen trivialization transports a vector vertically from to . Outside the two graph points agree, so extending by the identity gives a continuous bundle isomorphism .
Near any , choose so every with vanishes there. On that neighborhood , and carries the restriction over the graph of to the graph of . Enlarging does not change this map locally because the added are identities. These local formulas therefore define a continuous fiberwise-linear isomorphism . Reversing the finite local composites gives its continuous inverse.
By [F1] the two endpoint restrictions are precisely and , so step 4.1 proves the assertion. AC was used in step 2.1 to supply DC and countabilize the arbitrary partition; the finite strip constructions are choice-free once their data are supplied. Different partitions and charts can give different endpoint maps, which is why no canonical isomorphism is claimed.
Depends on
- Pullback vector bundles and sections
- Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space admits a locally finite subordinate partition of unity
- AC supplies the dependent-choice instances used in vector-bundle constructions
- Numerable principal bundles are classified by maps to BG
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- General Thom isomorphism from the relative Serre spectral sequence Lemma
- Homotopic Grassmannian maps classify isomorphic bundles and conversely Lemma
- Normalized clutching data for bundles over X×S² Lemma
- Polynomial clutching families stabilize to linear clutching Lemma
- K⁰ is contravariantly functorial and homotopy invariant Proposition
- Fundamental product theorem for complex K-theory Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, Theorem 1.6 and Proposition 1.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.906 notes, Lecture 17 (standard reference, not scraped)