Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homotopic Grassmannian maps classify isomorphic bundles and conversely

Statement

Fix F{R,C}. Assume AC. Homotopic maps f0,f1:XGrn(F) pull back isomorphic tautological bundles when X is paracompact Hausdorff. Conversely, if the two pullbacks are isomorphic, then f0 and f1 are homotopic after the standard stabilization. In particular, classifying maps obtained from two numerable embeddings of one bundle are homotopic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F{R,C}, AC, a paracompact Hausdorff X, and the two maps in the statement.

[F1]

Endpoint pullbacks along a homotopy are isomorphic under the stated paracompact and AC hypotheses (Homotopy invariance of vector-bundle pullback).

[F2]

A bundle embedding is isomorphic to the pullback along its image-plane map (A bundle embedding produces its Grassmannian classifying map).

[F3]

Odd-coordinate displacement followed by Gram normalization gives a continuous stable homotopy of frames (Stable Stiefel space is contractible).

[A1]

AC has the meaning fixed in The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If H:X×IGrn(F) joins f0 to f1, then Hγn restricts to f0γn and f1γn. By [F1] these endpoint bundles are isomorphic. This proves the forward implication, with AC used exactly as in [F1].

F1A1assume-hyp
1.2

Conversely, suppose Φ:f0γnf1γn is an isomorphism. With coordinates indexed by r0, let O(er)=e2r+1 and P(er)=e2r+2. The injective paths (1s)I+sO and (1s)I+sP, with Gram normalization as in [F3], homotope f0 to Of0 and f1 to Pf1 as image-plane maps. The formulas are stagewise continuous and hence continuous in the stable weak topology.

F3assume-hyp
2.1

View the tautological inclusions as embeddings ji:fiγnX×F. For 0θπ/2, the fiber map vcosθO(j0v)+sinθP(j1Φv) is injective: its two terms lie in orthogonal odd and even coordinate subspaces, so its squared norm is cos2θj0v2+sin2θj1Φv2>0 for v0. Its image planes therefore give a continuous homotopy from Of0 to Pf1.

F2step 1.2algebra
3.1

Concatenate the first displacement homotopy, the interpolation of step 2.1, and the reverse of the second displacement homotopy. This proves f0f1, the reverse implication. If two embeddings classify one bundle, [F2] identifies both pullbacks with that bundle, so this reverse implication applies. For n=0 every Grassmannian is a point, and for X= there is one map and one bundle; both implications remain valid.

F2step 1.2step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources