How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bundle embedding produces its Grassmannian classifying map
Statement
Assume AC. If is a continuous fiberwise-linear embedding of a rank- bundle, then is continuous as a map , and identifies with .
A supplied numeration gives an embedding into with locally finite coordinates. Every numeration has a countable numerable refinement under AC, so one may take and target . Over a compact Hausdorff base, finitely many coordinates suffice.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a rank- bundle , and the data in the applicable clause of the statement.
The tautological bundle over the Grassmannian has fiber over the plane (Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles).
A numeration is support-subordinate and locally finite (Locally finite partitions of unity and subordination to an open cover).
Steps 1.1–2.1 of Numerable principal bundles are classified by maps to BG countabilize an arbitrary indexed numeration under AC, producing countably many disjoint-union chart domains and a subordinate partition.
Under AC, a finite-rank bundle over a compact Hausdorff base is a direct summand of a finite trivial bundle (Finite-rank complement theorem over compact Hausdorff bases).
AC has the meaning fixed in The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
In a local frame of , write as a continuous full-rank matrix . The orthogonal projection onto its image is . Invertibility of the positive matrix and continuity of matrix inversion make continuous. The graph chart of [F1] identifies a plane continuously from its projection, so is continuous.
For supplied numerating charts and partition from [F2], define , with a zero coordinate off . Support containment makes each zero extension continuous, and local finiteness makes locally land in a finite coordinate subspace. Some at every , so is injective. This proves the locally finite-coordinate assertion without any choice beyond the supplied data.
The map , , is continuous and linear and bijective on every fiber. In the same local frame, its inverse on the image plane is represented by , which varies continuously. Hence is a bundle isomorphism.
Apply the countabilization [F3] to an arbitrary numeration. Using its countable chart domains in step 1.2 gives an embedding into , continuous for the weak direct-limit topology because it locally lands in a finite stage. This is the exact AC use in the countable clause.
If is compact Hausdorff, [F4] gives for finite . Restricting this isomorphism to the first summand gives a finite-dimensional bundle embedding, and steps 1.1–2.1 give its finite Grassmannian map and tautological pullback. The empty base and rank-zero cases use as in [F4].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, proof of Theorem 1.16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.906 notes, Lecture 20 (standard reference, not scraped)