How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Locally finite families remain locally finite after taking closures, closure commutes with their union, and a locally finite union of closed sets is closed
Statement
Let be a locally finite family of subsets of a topological space . Then is locally finite and Consequently, a locally finite union of closed subsets of is closed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally finite family in a topological space .
Local finiteness says that each point has a neighbourhood meeting only finitely many (Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements).
A point belongs to exactly when every neighbourhood of it meets , and is the smallest closed superset of (A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set).
Proof
Fix and a neighbourhood of meeting only . Choose an open neighbourhood of with . If , choose ; the open neighbourhood of then meets , so meets and .
The inclusion holds because each is contained in every closed set containing , in particular in .
Thus meets only , so the closed family is locally finite.
Let and take as in step 1.1; if , then for each an open neighbourhood of misses , and its finite intersection with an open neighbourhood inside misses every , contradicting the closure criterion.
Hence by steps 1.2 and 2.2; if every is closed, the right-hand side is , so that union is closed.
Depends on
- Refinements, locally finite families, point-finite families, and star refinements
- A point lies in the closure of $A$ iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets $A$; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals $A$ together with its derived set
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
Used by
- Under choice and dependent choice, every open cover of a compact Hausdorff space admits a finite subordinate partition of unity Corollary
- Assuming countable choice, every countably compact paracompact Hausdorff space is compact Lemma
- Every paracompact Hausdorff space is regular Lemma
- Under choice, every open cover of a paracompact Hausdorff space has locally finite open refinements {Vₛ} and {Wₛ} with overlineVₛ⊆ Wₛ⊆overlineWₛ⊆ Uₛ Lemma
- Every paracompact Hausdorff space is normal Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Robbin, Partitions of Unity (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. Semmes, Topology notes, Sections 5.13–5.14 (Rice University) (standard reference, not scraped)