How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold
Statement
Let be a topological -manifold and let . For every open neighbourhood of there is a chart of at and an open Euclidean ball such that
Consequently the sets of this form constitute a basis of the topology of . Their closures in are compact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological -manifold , a point , and an open neighbourhood of .
Every point of a topological manifold has a chart onto an open subset of (Topological manifolds without boundary: Hausdorff, second-countable, and locally Euclidean spaces, Manifold charts, coordinate domains, and coordinate functions).
For , Euclidean closed balls are compact (For , every Euclidean closed ball and every Euclidean sphere of positive radius is compact).
If is open and , then there exists with ; this is the usual metric-ball shrinking property of Euclidean open sets.
Homeomorphisms preserve openness, closures inside their domains, and compactness of subsets.
Proof
By [F1] choose a chart of at . Since is open and , replacing by and by its restriction still gives a chart at whose image is the open set in . So we may assume from the start that .
Put . Because is open, [A1] gives with . Then . This gives the required coordinate ball inside .
The closure of in is contained in , and [A2] identifies with the homeomorphic image of the Euclidean closed ball . For this set is compact by [L1], hence its homeomorphic image is compact by [A2] and the smaller closure in is compact as a closed subset of a compact set. When , the chart image is the one-point space , so the same conclusion is immediate.
Since step 2.1 works for every point and every open neighbourhood of , the coordinate balls form a basis of the topology of .
Depends on
Used by
- A countable coordinate-ball cover has a countable locally finite shrinking Lemma
- A countable coordinate-bump map embeds a manifold in countable Euclidean data Lemma
- Disk bundles over compact bases are compact manifolds with boundary Lemma
- Every open cover of a manifold has a countable relatively compact coordinate-ball subcover Lemma
- For compact sources the immersion condition is open in the weak smooth topology Lemma
- Joint jet continuity characterises the weak smooth topology Lemma
- The derivative map is continuous Lemma
- The weak smooth topology is independent of the chosen atlas Lemma
- Incompleteness is finite-time geodesic escape Proposition
- Topological manifolds are locally compact and locally path connected Proposition
- A smooth Urysohn lemma for a closed set in an open set Theorem
- Every smooth manifold admits a smooth proper exhaustion function Theorem
- Every smooth manifold embeds in some finite-dimensional Euclidean space Theorem
- Topological manifolds are sigma-compact Theorem
- Whitney approximation for Euclidean-valued maps Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rob van der Vorst, Introduction to differentiable manifolds, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)