How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The weak smooth topology is independent of the chosen atlas
Statement
The weak compact-open topology on is independent of the atlases of the fixed smooth structures used to describe it. In particular any supplied countable locally finite smooth atlas suffices. It is the initial topology for restriction of all jets to compact subsets of : on an arbitrary compact , restriction retains every coordinate derivative of every order, not merely the values of the map on . Thus two smooth maps agreeing on but having different derivatives there have different restricted jet data.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth manifolds and two atlases of their fixed smooth structures.
Weak neighbourhoods constrain finitely many coordinate derivatives on compact chart pieces (The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces); compatible chart changes are smooth (Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).
Coordinate balls have compact closures inside prescribed open neighbourhoods; compact subsets admit finite ambient open subcovers (Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it).
The chain rule and its repeated applications express finite-order derivatives of a composite in terms of finite-order derivatives of its factors (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps). Continuous functions on compact Euclidean pieces are bounded and uniformly continuous (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).
Proof
Fix a neighbourhood specified in the first atlases and a map belonging to it. On each of its nonempty compact pieces , the maximum derivative error of is strictly smaller than the prescribed tolerance, so there is a positive residual margin. Around each point of , choose a coordinate ball with compact closure inside the old source chart, a source chart of the second atlas, and the inverse image under of a target chart of the second atlas intersected with the old target chart. Finitely many smaller balls cover by [L1]. The resulting closed pieces are compact, cover , and lie entirely in these chart overlaps; unlike intersections of with open chart domains, they really are compact.
Choose compact target neighbourhoods of inside the target overlaps, and impose sufficiently small zeroth-order conditions to keep nearby maps there. Source transition derivatives are bounded on the ; target transition derivatives are bounded and uniformly continuous on these fixed target neighbourhoods. Repeated chain and product rules write each derivative in an old chart as a finite sum of products of new-coordinate derivatives and transition derivatives evaluated at the nearby map. Uniform continuity of the latter, together with boundedness of the former near , implies that sufficiently small new-coordinate errors through order make each old-coordinate error smaller than the residual margin from step 1.1. This comparison holds uniformly on each .
Intersect the finitely many new-chart conditions furnished by step 2.1. They give a weak neighbourhood of contained in the original neighbourhood, since the cover each . Thus every first-atlas neighbourhood is open in the second-atlas topology. Interchanging the atlases proves equality. This also applies to any supplied countable locally finite atlas; no existence claim about such an atlas is needed here.
Give the set of restricted jet data on a compact the topology generated by the finite-order chartwise uniform conditions on compact subsets of . Every such condition pulls back to a weak open condition on , and every weak basic condition is a pullback of one of them, using its compact piece . These two inclusions prove the asserted initial-topology description. Retaining jets makes this description meaningful even for a singleton or a compact set with empty interior.
Depends on
- The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces
- Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps
- Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous
- For a metric space with its metric topology, compactness in the topological sense is compactness in the metric sense, and the two notions of compact subset coincide
- Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces.
Dependency tree · two levels
51 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 3: Immersion theory (notes by O. Gwilliam), PDF pp. 1–4: Proposition 2.2 (disk), Definition 2.5 (Serre fibration), Definition 2.6 and Proposition 2.7 (flexible sheaves) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lectures 5 & 6: The Hirsch–Smale theorem (notes by C. Elliott), PDF pp. 1–4: Lemma 1.1, Corollary 1.2, Lemma 1.3 (Hirsch–Smale Fibration Lemma, n > k), Theorems 1.5 and 1.7, Lemma 1.6, Lemma 1.9 (standard reference, not scraped)