How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The derivative map is continuous
Statement
Assume for the smooth tangent-bundle structures. The derivative map , , is continuous for the weak compact-open topologies.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Smooth manifolds , their canonical tangent-bundle structures, , and an immersion .
Weak neighbourhoods impose finitely many finite-order derivative conditions on compact chart pieces (The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions).
In induced bundle coordinates, has the formula ; the global differential is smooth (Assuming countable choice, the global differential of a smooth map is smooth). Compatible chart changes are smooth, and the chain rule applies (The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps).
Proof
Fix a compact test set in a weak neighbourhood of . Cover by finitely many smaller compact pieces inside induced source bundle charts and target bundle charts containing their -images; such pieces exist by small coordinate balls and compactness (Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it). Their projections to are compact and their fibre coordinates are bounded.
In the coordinates of [L1], every derivative through order of is a derivative of through order , multiplied at most by a bounded fibre coordinate, or an entry of a lower derivative after differentiating in . Therefore sufficiently small weak errors in through order on the projected compact pieces imply all the order- conditions on . Arbitrary total-space charts are handled by the atlas comparison The weak smooth topology is independent of the chosen atlas, whose chain-rule estimates apply on these compact pieces.
Intersect these finitely many neighbourhoods with the prescribed first-component neighbourhood of . Its image under lies in the given product neighbourhood. Restricting to immersions proves continuity of , without compactness of .
Depends on
- The derivative map from immersions to formal immersions
- The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces
- Smoothness of a bundle map is equivalent to smooth local matrices
- The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps
- Space of immersions and space of formal immersions
- Assuming countable choice, the global differential of a smooth map is smooth
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Coordinate balls form a basis of a topological manifold
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- The weak smooth topology is independent of the chosen atlas
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew Ranicki, Algebraic and Geometric Surgery, Ch. 7 §7.4 “The Smale–Hirsch classification of immersions”, printed pp. 142–146 (Theorem 7.35, Proposition 7.39) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 3: Immersion theory (notes by O. Gwilliam), PDF pp. 1–4: Proposition 2.2 (disk), Definition 2.5 (Serre fibration), Definition 2.6 and Proposition 2.7 (flexible sheaves) (standard reference, not scraped)