Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular homotopy preserves the formal Gauss class

Statement

Assume ACω for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structures and global differentials. Let Mm,Nn be smooth manifolds with m≤n (no compactness of M is needed for this invariance) and let H:M×[0,1]→N be a regular homotopy, that is, a smooth map whose restriction Ht to every slice is an immersion. Then t↦(Ht,dHt) is a continuous path in FImm⁡(M,N) for the weak compact-open C∞ topology, and consequently every homotopy invariant of formal data is constant along a regular homotopy: the path component of (Ht,dHt) in FImm⁡(M,N) does not depend on t. For M=Sm,N=Rn this invariant is the Gauss frame class of the preceding items (the difference class in πm(Vm(Rn)) when n≥m+2); for M=S1,N=R2 it is the winding number, i.e. the rotation number. In particular two regularly homotopic immersions have homotopic formal data, which is the necessity half of every classification on this page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, smooth manifolds Mm,Nn with m≤n and a regular homotopy H:M×[0,1]→N.

[F1]

A regular homotopy is a smooth H with every slice Ht an immersion, with H0 and H1 the prescribed immersions; the space Imm⁡(M,N) carries the subspace topology of the weak compact-open C∞ topology. Regular homotopy of immersions, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions

[F2]

The weak compact-open C∞ topology is generated by finitely many chart data, compact chart pieces and derivative tolerances. The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces

[F3]

Under ACω for the smooth tangent-bundle structures, the derivative map D:Imm⁡(M,N)→FImm⁡(M,N), f↦(f,df), is continuous for the weak topologies. The derivative map is continuous

[F4]

For compact M, path components of Imm⁡(M,N) are exactly the regular homotopy classes. A continuous family of immersions on a compact parameter domain can be smoothed through immersions relative to the parameter boundary provided its adjoint is smooth on a neighbourhood of that boundary times M; these assertions inherit the countable-choice assumption of the relative approximation theorem. Smooth families and path components in the weak topology, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F5]

Points joined by a continuous path lie in the same path component, and path components are the equivalence classes of the relation "joined by a path". Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints

[F6]

The adjoint and evaluation correspondences for smooth families of maps identify a smooth H:M×[0,1]→N with a map [0,1]→C∞(M,N). Smooth families of maps and their evaluation maps, The exponential law: for a locally compact metric X and any spaces Z and Y, transposition is a bijection between C(X×Z,Y) and C(Z,C(X,Y)) with the compact-open topology

[F7]

The angular winding invariant of formal circle immersions equals rotation number on derivatives. Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number.

[F8]

For sphere sections with simply connected Stiefel fibre, the evaluation lemma identifies components by the difference class. The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration.

Proof

1.1F1F2F6

The adjoint H^:[0,1]→C∞(M,N), H^(t)=Ht, is continuous for the weak compact-open C∞ topology directly from the definition: a basic weak neighbourhood of Ht0 is determined by finitely many charts, compact pieces Ki⊆M and tolerances εi on derivatives of order at most ri, and compactness with continuity gives a closed time interval J about t0 relative to [0,1] on which H(Ki×J) lies in every prescribed target chart. For each of the finitely many occurring multi-indices α the local expression Dα(ψi∘Ht∘φi−1)(x) is continuous on the compact set φi(Ki)×J, hence uniformly continuous there, so for t close to t0 every one of the finitely many derivatives stays within its tolerance; therefore H^ is continuous. Its image lies in Imm⁡(M,N) because every slice of H is an immersion by [F1].

2.1F3step 1.1

Composition with the continuous derivative map [F3] gives the continuous path t↦D(Ht)=(Ht,dHt) in FImm⁡(M,N), since the composite of continuous maps is continuous and H^ takes values in Imm⁡(M,N) by step 1.1.

3.1F5step 2.1

A continuous path has all its points in a single path component [F5], so the path component of (Ht,dHt) in FImm⁡(M,N) is independent of t; hence every invariant of formal data that is constant on path components takes the same value at (H0,dH0) and (H1,dH1), which is the necessity half of the classifications: regularly homotopic immersions have homotopic formal data.

4.1F4F7F8step 3.1∎

The two instances: for M=Sm, N=Rn with n≥m+2, the path component of the formal data is detected by the difference class of the basepoint-evaluation lemma through the section-space description of FImm⁡(Sm,Rn), so the class in πm(Vm(Rn)) is constant along a regular homotopy; for M=S1, N=R2 the corresponding invariant of a path component is the winding number, which for the derivative (f,df) is the rotation number of the immersion, as established in Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number. The sphere difference-class conclusion is The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration. The compact-source identification of path components with regular homotopy classes used in the converse direction is [F4] with its countable-choice hypothesis; the invariance proved here uses steps 1.1–3.1 and inherits the structural countable-choice hypothesis of [F3]. No approximation or additional choice is used in this direct argument.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources