How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular Homotopy and Sphere Eversion
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cup Cap Cross Products and Cohomology Rings
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Direct Matrix Factorisations: LU, Cholesky and QR
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Formal Immersions and the Smale Hirsch Theorem
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Gradient Like Vector Fields and Morse Trajectories
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Handle Decompositions Duality and Rearrangement
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Kunneth Exactness and Splittings over Principal Ideal Domains
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Leray–Hirsch, the Thom Isomorphism, and Gysin Sequences
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Recurrences and Rational Generating Functions
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices
- Morse Functions Critical Values and Genericity
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Orientations Poincare Lefschetz and Alexander Duality
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Splitting Fields
- Stiefel Whitney and Euler Classes by Universal Constructions
- Sublevel Deformation and the Handle Attachment Theorem
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Gauss Bonnet Theorem for Riemannian Surfaces
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topological Vector Bundles and Grassmannian Classification
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
2 · Summary
This page applies the Smale--Hirsch theory of formal immersions. The derivative of an immersion into Euclidean space is a section of the monomorphism bundle . Once a tangent metric is supplied, fibrewise polar normalization gives a section of the separate orthonormal Stiefel bundle . The proposition below proves the deformation retraction between these section-space models; it retains the positive-definite factor rather than identifying all injections with orthonormal frames. Formal Euclidean immersions consist of a base map together with a monomorphism section. Contracting the base-map factor and normalizing the section show that their homotopy theory is that of Stiefel-bundle sections. The differential of a regular homotopy is a path of formal data, giving the necessity half of each classification.
The page computes the two instances the design requires. For the circle in the plane the tangent bundle is trivial, the section space has by degree, and the resulting invariant of an immersion is the rotation number: this is the Whitney--Graustein classification , with the nonzero-fold round circles realising every nonzero integer and the Gerono lemniscate realising zero. For spheres in positive codimension the basepoint evaluation of the section space is a Hurewicz fibration whose fibre is the based section space; its long exact sequence, together with the connectivity of Stiefel manifolds and the vanishing proved here from the quaternion double cover, gives Smale's classification: for regular homotopy classes of immersions correspond to , realised by the clutching difference class of the tangent framings, and in codimension one the target-rotation loop argument upgrades the surjection to a non-canonical bijection from . The vanishing for in makes path connected, so the standard embedding is regularly homotopic to its inside-out reflection: this is sphere eversion.
Two closing remarks separate the phenomena. Eversion cannot be an isotopy through embeddings, since the sign of the parametrisation relative to the bounded complementary region changes and is computed by a continuous flux integral; and regular homotopy permits self-intersections but never a rank drop. The page contributes only the differential-topological reduction: the homotopy groups of Stiefel manifolds remain algebraic-topology inputs, as the closing remark records. Countable choice supplies the general smooth tangent structures and metrics, and is inherited through the Smale--Hirsch and smoothing suppliers, while the non-isotopy argument additionally inherits the axiom of choice used by Jordan--Brouwer separation.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Gauss frame map of an immersion into Euclidean space
Definition
Supply the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structures and smooth global differential, established under by Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure and Assuming countable choice, the global differential of a smooth map is smooth. Once these are supplied, the following constructions use no further choice.
Let be a smooth immersion with . Canonically trivializing the target tangent bundle makes its differential a smooth section whose fibre consists of injective linear maps , with the subspace smooth structure in the space of linear maps. This is the unnormalized Gauss data of .
For a smooth local tangent frame , the local Gauss frame map is the full-rank matrix A change of frame by changes this matrix to . These frame changes define the monomorphism bundle, and the smoothness of gives a smooth section in every such trivialization.
If a smooth tangent metric is supplied, write for the separate bundle of isometric linear injections into the Euclidean target. Its fibre in an orthonormal tangent frame is the Stiefel manifold . The normalized Gauss section is the fibrewise polar part Positivity of , smoothness of its positive square root, and independence of orthonormal tangent frames are proved in Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections ↗. For an orthogonal change of tangent frame the normalized matrix changes to . Ordinary Gram–Schmidt in an arbitrary frame does not supply this equivariant formula; polar normalization is the convention here.
A global tangent frame identifies with the product bundle with fibre . Orthonormalizing that frame in the supplied metric identifies with the product bundle with fibre , so the normalized section becomes a global map into that Stiefel manifold. Without a global frame it remains a section of . Polar decomposition retains a positive-definite factor in the monomorphism fibre, and the cited proposition proves the resulting deformation retraction onto the Stiefel fibre. For both fibres are points; for they are respectively and .
No tangent metric is part of the unnormalized datum; normalization uses the supplied metric. No orientation, properness or normal framing is required. The normal bundle is the quotient and is not part of these Gauss data. The model assertions in this definition are justified by the cited proposition, whose proof uses the raw full-rank matrix and frame-change definitions without assuming those assertions.
Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections
Statement
Let be a smooth manifold and . Supply its canonical smooth tangent bundle and smooth global differential, and fix a smooth Riemannian metric on . These smooth constructions and such a metric exist under ; the conclusions below require no additional choice once they are supplied. Give its Euclidean metric. Distinguish the monomorphism bundle from its orthonormal Stiefel subbundle , whose fibre is , associated to the orthonormal frame bundle of . All section spaces carry the weak compact-open topology. Then:
- Smooth bundle monomorphisms over the identity correspond homeomorphically to . Fibrewise polar normalization gives an -equivariant strong deformation retraction . In an orthonormal frame, the polar map is a diffeomorphism , where the second factor consists of positive-definite self-adjoint matrices; thus the monomorphism fibre and the Stiefel fibre have the same homotopy type, rather than being identified homeomorphically.
- The canonical target tangent trivialization gives the actual homeomorphism . Contracting the first factor and polar-normalizing the second give a homotopy equivalence . In particular the two spaces have the same path components and homotopy invariants. Under the actual homeomorphism, the derivative map is ; in the normalized model it sends to its polar normalization.
- For the standard metric on , the bundle is the pullback along of the bundle of isometric injections from the tautological -plane to . Whenever is trivial, is trivial; in particular .
No orientation of or global tangent frame is needed. The normalization uses the supplied metric; the canonical smooth tangent constructions and metric existence for general are the stated countable-choice uses. The section-space maps use no further choice once those data are supplied.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth manifold with a supplied smooth tangent metric, , the trivial Euclidean bundle , the monomorphism bundle , and the orthonormal Stiefel subbundle .
In a local tangent frame, a fibrewise injection is a full-rank matrix, and changes of tangent frame act by right multiplication; these matrices represent the formal Gauss data. Gauss frame map of an immersion into Euclidean space
A formal immersion is a smooth map and a smooth bundle monomorphism covering ; the formal immersion spaces and smooth mapping spaces have the weak compact-open topology, generated by finitely many compact chart pieces and derivative bounds. Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions, The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces
A smooth section is a smooth map into the bundle whose projection is the identity. Smooth sections, local sections, and support
A bundle map over the identity restricts to a linear map on each fibre; smoothness is checked in local bundle charts. Vector bundle maps over a smooth base map, Smooth vector bundles, rank, fibres, and trivial bundles
A locally trivial fibre bundle has local product charts. Locally trivial fiber bundle
consists of ordered orthonormal frames; the Grassmannian has graph charts, and its tautological bundle has fibre the represented plane. Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles
The orthonormal frame bundle, using the supplied metric, is a principal -bundle; its associated bundles use the given group action. Frame bundles and associated vector bundles
For a regular level set its tangent space is the kernel of the differential. The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel
A smooth vector bundle is trivial if and only if it admits a smooth global frame. A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame
Under countable choice every smooth manifold admits a Riemannian metric. Every smooth manifold admits a riemannian metric, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
A smooth positive-definite self-adjoint bundle endomorphism has a unique smooth positive square root. Locally, the derivative of matrix squaring at a positive matrix is ; its eigenvalues on symmetric matrices are , so the root is smooth in the matrix entries. Positive-definite bundle endomorphisms have smooth positive square roots
Under , the canonical tangent-bundle atlas gives smooth local product charts linear on each fibre, and the global differential of a smooth map is smooth. Assuming countable choice, the tangent bundle has a canonical smooth 2n-manifold structure, Assuming countable choice, the global differential of a smooth map is smooth. These structures are supplied here.
Proof
Use the supplied smooth tangent-bundle structures of [F12] and the supplied metric; [F10] supplies one under if needed. In any local tangent frame the condition that a matrix have rank is open, so [F1] and [F4] give the smooth monomorphism bundle . Orthonormal tangent frames give the associated bundle with fibre in [F6] and [F7], which is exactly its isometric-injection subbundle . The map is a bijection onto by [F3]. It is a homeomorphism: section coordinates are precisely the matrix coefficients on each compact base chart piece. A compact piece of has compact base projection and bounded vector coordinates, so controlling coefficient jets there controls every jet of the fibre-linear total-space map. Conversely evaluating that map along the finitely many local basis-vector sections over a compact base piece recovers each coefficient and all its derivatives. These two estimates show that the weak total-space and coefficient topologies agree with the section topology in [F2].
For an injective put and . By [F11] these operations are smooth, and . Conversely with isometric and positive gives , uniquely, so this is the asserted local polar diffeomorphism. Under a change of orthonormal tangent frame , changes to , to , and to ; hence it descends globally without a global frame. The path remains injective because its second factor is positive definite, has and , and fixes every isometric . The operations and this path are continuous for weak section topologies: on finitely many compact chart pieces the positive spectra stay bounded away from zero, and the smooth matrix operations and all chain-rule derivatives vary continuously there. Thus it is an equivariant strong deformation retraction of section spaces. Rank zero gives the unique empty matrix and the same formulas.
The canonical identification sends a formal immersion to with the same fibre map. This is a bijection onto and a homeomorphism for the identical local matrix/derivative neighbourhoods, as in step 1.1. The contraction deforms the first factor to zero; combining it with step 2.1 on the second factor gives the homotopy equivalence to . Its homotopy inverse sends an isometric section to . For an immersion the smooth formal pair is by [F2] and [F12], so the normalized section is the polar part of , as stated. No compactness of is needed because every basic neighbourhood controls only finitely many compact chart pieces.
If has a smooth global frame by [F9], orthonormalizing it in the supplied metric gives a global orthonormal frame and identifies with . For with its standard metric, [F8] gives ; its projection varies smoothly, so the Gauss map to the Grassmannian is smooth in its graph charts. The tautological-plane pullback of [F6] therefore is , and its isometric-injection bundle pulls back to . On the standard unit angular field is a global orthonormal frame, giving . When the Stiefel and monomorphism fibres are points, and when the normalized fibre is while the monomorphism fibre retains its positive-definite polar factor. These are included in the same construction.
The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration
Statement
Let , let be the orthonormal Stiefel model of the section-space proposition with fibre , let , and let be the space of smooth sections of with the weak compact-open topology and the subspace of sections that take a fixed chosen value . Then:
- The evaluation map , , is a Hurewicz fibration with fibre .
- If , a trivialisation of the pullback of to the closed characteristic disk and a reference section identify , up to homotopy, with the space of continuous based maps ; hence whenever ; if and then as well, because the fibre is path connected and evaluation is surjective on path components. Via this bijection the class of a section in is its difference class: if two sections agree at , the resulting transported disk models give based maps , and two sections are homotopic through sections fixed at exactly when these based maps are based-homotopic.
- When , base the fibration at a chosen section in . Its long exact sequence yields an exact sequence of pointed sets in particular, if is simply connected and then the difference class induces a non-canonical bijection , and if , and then is path connected. The last conclusion requires a path-connected fibre; it is not asserted for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , the basepoint , the bundle with fibre , a chosen value , and the smooth section spaces , with the weak compact-open topology. Write , for continuous sections with the compact-open topology.
The Stiefel model of has fibre the orthonormal injections ; a frame of trivialises this bundle. Fibrewise polar normalization of arbitrary monomorphisms is a deformation retraction to this model, so it gives the same section homotopy type. Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections
is the space of ordered orthonormal -frames and is path connected for . Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles, Stiefel manifolds are connected in positive codimension and simply connected in codimension at least two
Assuming AC, a numerable locally trivial fibre bundle is a Hurewicz fibration with its supplied charts and partition of unity. The supplier proof uses AC only to well-order the set of finite chart words (its well-order construction). Locally trivial fiber bundle, Numerable fiber bundles are hurewicz fibrations
A Hurewicz fibration in CGWH has the homotopy lifting property relative to every closed cofibration pair, and lifts paths with prescribed initial points; that relative clause is choice-free. A fibration has path lifting and homotopy lifting relative to a subspace
The pair is a relative CW pair, arising from by attaching one -cell, and CW pairs are cofibration pairs with the homotopy extension property; products with are taken with their ordinary topology. CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology, Cofibration and homotopy extension property
Evaluation at a point of a compact source is continuous for the compact-open topology, and the exponential correspondence identifies maps with maps for compact . The compact-open topology on for a metric domain , with subbasis , The exponential law: for a locally compact metric and any spaces and , transposition is a bijection between and with the compact-open topology
For a based Serre fibration the long exact sequence of homotopy groups is exact in all degrees, with pointed sets in degree zero; is the pointed set of path components and is computed by based cubes. Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration, Higher homotopy group by based cubes
Cubical and spherical models agree: a fixed orientation-preserving homeomorphism induces . Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree
The fibre over a basepoint is the inverse image with its subspace topology, and based homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms on all homotopy groups. Fiber and fiber homotopy equivalence, Higher homotopy groups are functorial and based homotopy invariant
A continuous linear matrix equation has a unique solution on its prescribed compact time interval; for a smooth coefficient depending on parameters, local solution maps depend smoothly on those parameters. Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval, Smooth dependence of ODE solutions on parameters
A smooth positive-definite self-adjoint bundle endomorphism has a unique smooth positive square root; locally the matrix squaring derivative is the invertible Sylvester map , whose eigenvalues are , so the square root is smooth in the matrix parameters. Positive-definite bundle endomorphisms have smooth positive square roots
Proof
Evaluation on smooth sections is locally trivial. The group acts on every section by target multiplication. For any frame , complete it to an orthonormal basis; Gram-Schmidt applied to a nearby frame followed by the remaining fixed basis vectors gives a smooth orthogonal matrix with and . Thus identifies with , including its inverse . These maps are continuous for the weak topology because target multiplication multiplies each derivative by the same finite matrix. The same argument works for continuous sections. If either section space is nonempty the transitive action makes evaluation surjective; otherwise its fibres are all empty. If a section space is empty, its evaluation has the homotopy lifting property vacuously, so it is a Hurewicz fibration with empty fibres without invoking a surjective bundle convention. For a nonempty section space, compactness of gives finitely many such neighbourhoods, with a subordinate continuous partition obtained from finitely many ambient bump functions. Order these finitely many charts once, and well-order their finite words first by length and then lexicographically. Substituting this explicit well-order in the well-order construction of the proof of [F3] supplies its sole use of AC; all remaining constructions there apply to the supplied finite numeration without choice. Thus both evaluations are Hurewicz fibrations; their fibres at are the prescribed fixed-value section spaces. This argument applies also when and is disconnected.
Polar normalization is well defined for any fibrewise injection : in the global matrix presentation put , which is positive definite, and normalize by . By [F11] this operation is smooth on smooth sections and continuous on continuous sections. The fibrewise path remains injective and fixes orthonormal sections, giving the deformation retraction to the Stiefel model used in [F1]. We now compare its smooth and continuous fixed-value section spaces constructively. Represent an orthonormal section by matrices with and , where , and put . Extend radially to an annulus, multiply by a fixed radial cutoff equal to one near the unit sphere, and convolve with a fixed smooth compactly supported Euclidean kernel of radius . Restriction to the sphere and right multiplication by gives a smooth bundle map , converging uniformly to . Pin its value by adding , for a fixed smooth bump with ; denote the result by . It equals at , converges uniformly to , depends continuously on into the smooth topology for , and these operators have a common uniform norm bound.
Choose an orthonormal basis of . For the closed unit disk , write and define , with . The functions and are smooth at by their power series, so is smooth on the closed disk. Its boundary maps to , its interior maps homeomorphically to , and the induced map is a homeomorphism, since it is a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space. Put and . Solve , . By [F10] the solution exists throughout and is jointly smooth in : the local smooth solution maps patch along the compact time interval by uniqueness. Since , ; differentiating gives , and therefore solves the linear equation with zero initial value and is zero. Consequently is a smooth orthonormal frame of on the whole closed disk, including its boundary. By [F1] it trivialises .
There is a continuous positive smoothing radius on the entire metric space . For every integer , put is continuous, since the uniformly bounded operators make these functions uniformly Lipschitz, and . Put and . Both series converge uniformly, the denominator is positive, and if is the first positive weight then and . Every convex combination is therefore injective on the tangent fibres. Normalize it by on those fibres; the inverse square root is given by the convergent binomial series near the identity, since . This normalization is continuous, smooth in when is smooth, and fixes at . It gives a homotopy from the identity to a continuous smoothing map ; restricted to smooth sections it is continuous in the weak topology as well. Thus inclusion and are homotopy inverses. The same construction without the pinning correction compares the unrestricted section spaces. No family of charts or approximation choices is selected: the kernel, cutoffs and series are fixed.
In this frame the prescribed fibre value determines a boundary map , generally nonconstant. A continuous fixed-value section pulls back to a map with . Conversely such a map gives a section of whose images in all equal on the collapsed boundary, so it descends to a unique continuous section of . This bijection is a homeomorphism . For compact-open continuity, pullback is continuous, and if is compact then is compact, so the inverse image of the section neighbourhood is the corresponding pullback neighbourhood over ; composing with the bundle frame and its inverse is continuous by the exponential correspondence. The same quotient reasoning applies to parametrized homotopies.
If and , [F2] makes path connected. A path from any evaluated value to lifts under the smooth evaluation fibration of step 1.1, producing a section in . The same lifting moves a representative of every component of into , so the map of component sets is surjective.
If , choose its disk model and one , and put . The formula contracts to the constant map while fixing . Restriction is a Hurewicz fibration: is a closed cofibration, as its radial collar gives the usual homotopy extension retraction of onto ; for every test space, compose that retraction with the prescribed disk map and boundary homotopy and transpose by [F6]. Lifting the path , with all points of its starting fibre as parameters, gives transport . Transport along the reversed path is a homotopy inverse: the two concatenations retrace the same path and contract to constant paths by shortening their excursion; relative homotopy lifting [F4] lifts these contractions to fibre homotopies, with prescribed initial maps. Thus .
The constant-boundary maps descend to the based mapping space , again homeomorphically for compact-open topologies. Combining steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 gives and hence by [F8]. A homotopy of sections fixed at gives a path in and, under transport, a based homotopy in . Conversely a based homotopy can be transported back, and the fibre homotopies between the composites and the identities provide a fixed-value section homotopy; the smoothing comparison makes it a homotopy of smooth sections when the endpoints are smooth. These are both directions of the difference-class criterion. The identification depends on the disk frame, reference section and contraction; it is not canonical.
The homotopy exact sequence of evaluation, based at a chosen section in , is the displayed sequence of [F7]. When is simply connected, two fibre components that become connected in differ by transport around a loop in ; a nullhomotopy of that loop and relative lifting show they were already connected in the fibre. Thus the component map is injective, and step 2.3 makes it surjective, giving by step 4.1. If instead , and , steps 4.1 and 2.3 show that is a quotient of a singleton and hence itself a singleton. The connected-fibre hypothesis cannot be omitted: for the two orientations of an everywhere nonzero circle field give two section components even though .
Stiefel manifolds are connected in positive codimension and simply connected in codimension at least two
Statement
For : (a) is path connected when ; (b) when , where is the standard frame. In particular is simply connected for , and is homeomorphic to and connected, with . No orientation of the frames is involved: is the space of ordered orthonormal -frames.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , the standard frame , and the two-letter alphabet .
with the subspace topology; in particular is the unit sphere . Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles
A locally trivial fibre bundle has product charts ; it is numerable when the data include a locally finite partition of unity whose closed supports lie in the chart domains. Locally trivial fiber bundle
Every numerable fibre bundle is a Hurewicz fibration, hence a Serre fibration. Numerable fiber bundles are hurewicz fibrations The only use of AC in its proof is the well-order of the set of finite chart words; for a two-element chart family the finite words in two letters are enumerated explicitly by length and binary expansion, so the instance used below needs no choice principle.
For a based Serre fibration with fibre , the long exact sequence of homotopy groups is exact in every degree, with pointed sets in degree zero and groups from degree one on. Long exact sequence of homotopy groups of a fibration
is the set of based cubes modulo boundary-fixed homotopies and is the pointed set of path components of . Higher homotopy group by based cubes
A based homeomorphism induces bijections on and isomorphisms on all , . Higher homotopy groups are functorial and based homotopy invariant
For every continuous based map is nullhomotopic through maps fixing ; consequently for . Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic
For the unit sphere is path connected. For , the sphere is path-connected and connected
is the special orthogonal group. Orthogonal and special orthogonal Lie groups The in the cited example supplies the Lie group structure on and and is not used here; only the displayed matrix set is needed.
A space is simply connected exactly when it is -connected, i.e. nonempty, path connected, and has trivial fundamental group at every basepoint. N connected space and n connected map
Proof
For the first-vector map , , is a locally trivial fibre bundle with fibre . The open sets and cover , and on the denominators are bounded below by , so the Householder reflections depend continuously on and are orthogonal; they satisfy and , hence map the hyperplane isometrically onto . Therefore are homeomorphisms over , with inverses .
Base case : by [F1], which is nonempty and path connected for by [F8]; and for every based loop is nullhomotopic by [F7] with , so .
The explicit functions satisfy on and have closed supports , so is a partition of unity subordinate to the two-element cover of step 1.1. With these charts the bundle of step 1.1 is numerable, so by [F3] it is a Hurewicz fibration and in particular a Serre fibration; the only choice-like step of the cited proof is the well-order of finite words over the chart alphabet, and for the two-element alphabet the words are explicitly enumerated by their binary digits, so this application uses no choice. The identification of the fibre over with is the homeomorphism restricted to , so and of the fibre are those of by [F6].
Step (a) for : assume is path connected, which by the induction hypothesis holds because gives . The bundle of steps 1.1 and 2.1 is a based Serre fibration with path-connected base and fibre over , and its exact sequence in degree zero reads , a sequence of pointed sets whose two outer terms are singletons; exactness makes the middle term a singleton as well, that is, is path connected.
Step (b) for : assume , which by the induction hypothesis holds because gives . The exact sequence of the same based Serre fibration reads , and the target is trivial by [F7] with because ; exactness makes the first map surjective, so the triviality of forces . Since is path connected by step 3.1, triviality at one basepoint gives triviality at every basepoint.
For the final identifications: the map that sends to the matrix whose first columns are and whose last column is the unique unit vector orthogonal to all with is a bijection onto : the orthogonal complement of is a line containing exactly two unit vectors, and exactly one of them gives determinant ; the coordinates of are the minors of the matrix , namely the coefficients of the Hodge dual, which are polynomial in the entries of the , and the inverse is the continuous projection to the first columns, so is a homeomorphism. Hence by [F6] the homotopy invariants of and agree, and is connected by step 3.1 applied with . The case gives , consistent with . Steps 1.2, 3.1 and 4.1 cover and all in the stated ranges, and together with the definition of simple connectivity [F10] they give that is simply connected whenever .
The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes
Statement
. More precisely, for the two-sheeted covering homomorphism , , from the unit quaternions onto the rotations of , the induced homomorphism is a bijection and . Consequently also and : the map is a homeomorphism , and is the disjoint union of the two cosets of , each homeomorphic to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quaternion double cover , the identity matrix , and the standard frames of , of .
defines a continuous surjective group homomorphism with kernel , it is a two-sheeted covering map, and for every covering , every and every , the induced map is an isomorphism. The quaternion double cover generates the third homotopy group of SO(3)
is computed by based cubes and is the pointed set of path components; is a group and based homotopy equivalences induce isomorphisms. Cubical classes agree with based sphere-map classes. Cubical and spherical models of higher homotopy agree, Higher homotopy group by based cubes, Higher homotopy groups are functorial and based homotopy invariant
For , every continuous based map is nullhomotopic through maps fixing . Lower-dimensional sphere maps are based nullhomotopic
with the subspace topology; is the group of real matrices with and . Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles, The quaternion double cover generates the third homotopy group of SO(3). Write with its matrix subspace topology.
The cross product is bilinear, alternating, orthogonal to both factors, and satisfies the scalar triple product identity . The cross product in , The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors
Proof
The map , , is a homeomorphism. Its image lies in : for orthonormal the vector is orthogonal to and by [F6] and is unit, since expanding its coordinates gives , so the three columns are orthonormal, and by the triple product identity [F6]. It is injective because the first two columns determine the argument. It is surjective: for with columns , the vector is a unit vector orthogonal to and by [F6], hence equals , and the sign is because ; thus with . Both and the projection to the first two columns are continuous, so is a homeomorphism.
is an isomorphism: is a two-sheeted covering map by [F1], and covering projections induce isomorphisms on for by the second clause of [F1] applied with , , .
: every continuous based map is nullhomotopic through based maps by [F4] with , so every element of equals the class of the constant map, the distinguished element of the group [F3].
Hence : an isomorphism of groups carries the distinguished element to the distinguished element, so the triviality of the source in step 1.3 forces the triviality of the target.
is the disjoint union of its two cosets: every has by , so or for the reflection , and the two cosets are disjoint and each is homeomorphic to by left translation. Since the square is connected, every based cube and every boundary-fixed homotopy of such cubes lies in the single component of the basepoint, so evaluating cubical representatives identifies with of the component of , which after left translation is and hence is by step 2.1.
at every basepoint : the homeomorphism of step 1.1 satisfies and is a based homotopy equivalence, so it induces an isomorphism [F3]; the left translation is a homeomorphism of carrying to , hence induces an isomorphism , which is by step 2.1. Together with steps 2.1 and 3.1 this proves all three claimed vanishings at every basepoint, the argument uses the unconditional topological covering statement [F1] and no Lie-group structure or choice principle.
Rotation number of an immersed oriented circle in the plane
Definition
Let be oriented and parametrised as with the positive orientation, let be the corresponding positively oriented unit tangent vector field of , and let be a smooth immersion, that is, a regular closed curve (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts). Writing for the canonical identification, the differential (The differential of a smooth map, The tangent bundle as a disjoint union) gives for each the velocity vector , which is nonzero because is an immersion.
The normalised velocity, or unit tangent, of is the map which is continuous because the velocity never vanishes and every nonzero vector is a positive multiple of a unique unit vector.
The rotation number (also rotation index) of is the degree of the unit tangent map. Concretely, after choosing the base point , identifying the unit circle with by the standard parametrisation and rotating the target circle by a constant so that corresponds to , the class of is a based loop in the sense of The degree of a based circle loop, and its degree is the integer ; the constant rotation of the target plane changes neither the winding number nor the degree, and the degree descends to based loop classes (Degree defines a function ), so the value is independent of the choice of and of the lift used to compute it (Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree).
Equivalent formulations, all taking the same value:
- The velocity curve is a closed , hence rectifiable, loop in , and is its winding number about the origin: the normalised velocity is exactly , and after the constant nonzero complex multiplication of the target plane, which changes neither the winding number about nor the degree of the normalised loop, For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree identifies with the degree of the normalised loop, while Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers identifies that winding number with the class in .
- equals times the total signed turning angle of the tangent, i.e. the rotation index of the regular closed plane curve in the sense of Rotation index of a regular closed plane curve, where the tangent angle is lifted continuously and the corner jumps are zero for a smooth curve.
The normalisation is fixed by the round unit circle: the immersion traversed once in the positive direction has unit tangent winding once positively, hence rotation number , and its reverse has rotation number . Reversing the orientation of the domain negates the rotation number, while a regular (orientation-preserving) reparametrisation leaves it unchanged. Indeed, if is a positively oriented circle diffeomorphism with increasing lift satisfying , then the chain rule gives : composing a tangent-angle lift with preserves its total increment. For the reversal , , so an angle lift is when lifts ; its total increment is the negative of that of .
No convexity, simplicity, self-intersection restriction or properness is imposed; is an invariant of the oriented immersed circle, not of its image.
Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number
Statement
Let be the Stiefel bundle of the section-space proposition for and , with fibre . Then is trivial, its section space is homeomorphic to with the weak smooth topology, and by degree. The resulting winding invariant of a formal immersion is the degree of the section expressed in the angular trivialisation defined by ; for the derivative of an immersion it equals the rotation number of the preceding definition. Two formal immersions of into lie in the same path component of if and only if their winding invariants are equal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The oriented circle , its positively oriented unit tangent field , the angular frame , and the bundle with fibre .
With the standard angular metric, the normalized Stiefel bundle is . The monomorphism section space retracts to its smooth isometric section space by polar normalization, and ; the contractible first factor gives the same path components. Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections
for an immersion , with the normalised velocity. Rotation number of an immersed oriented circle in the plane
A smooth rank- vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame; is a global frame of ; global frames trivialise the frame bundle and every associated bundle. A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, Local and global frames of a vector bundle, Frame bundles and associated vector bundles
is the unit circle and the fibres of are the isometric injections . Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles
Degree descends to path-homotopy classes of based circle loops and identifies them up to homotopy: two based circle loops are path-homotopic exactly when their degrees agree; equivalently the winding number of a closed rectifiable loop in about is the degree of its normalised circle loop and classifies its loop class. Two based circle loops are path-homotopic if and only if they have equal degree, Degree defines a function , For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree, Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers
For and , use their finite standard atlases: their derivative transitions and fixed rational-ball bases give smooth tangent total spaces without choice. The angular frame identifies , and ; these explicit structures supply the tangent-space topology used here. Define the concrete formal space directly as the set of smooth pairs with and each linear and injective, with the subspace topology from (The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces). The tangent total spaces are the explicit products just constructed, so this instance uses no general tangent-bundle existence premise.
Proof
is trivial with the global frame : the field is smooth and nowhere zero at every point of the circle, so it is a global frame by [F3]. Hence by the triviality clause of [F1], and its fibres are the isometric injections , identified with by [F4].
Under the trivialisation of step 1.1, a smooth section of is exactly a smooth map , so ; a section corresponds to the coordinate of in the trivialisation, a nowhere-zero continuous function for a monomorphism. Writing for a bundle monomorphism over the identity, normalisation is a homotopy of nowhere-zero maps, because the straight segment from to stays in the open ray through and misses .
Degree classifies the smooth section components. A smooth circle map has a smooth angular lift with , where is its degree: the continuous lift in the circle-loop model is smooth on each local inverse branch of the exponential. The linear interpolation exponentiates to a smooth path of circle maps to the standard degree- map, continuous in the weak topology. Thus equal degrees give a path of smooth sections; conversely any such path is a continuous homotopy and preserves degree by [F5]. Every integer occurs via , so .
The winding invariant is the degree of the section of in the fixed trivialisation of step 1.1, so is constant on path components and induces the bijection of step 3.1. For the derivative of an immersion, the corresponding section is the velocity map , whose normalisation is ; by step 2.1 and are homotopic through nowhere-zero maps, so they have the same degree, and that degree is by [F2].
Two formal immersions , a smooth with a smooth bundle monomorphism over in the sense of [F6], lie in the same path component of exactly when agrees: by [F1], is homotopy equivalent to via polar normalization, and is contractible, so path components of the product correspond bijectively to path components of , which are classified by the degree by step 3.1; the winding invariant is that degree. This fixes the normalisation: the round unit circle traversed once in the positive direction has and its reverse has , matching the sign convention of [F2].
Regular homotopy preserves the formal Gauss class
Statement
Assume for the canonical smooth tangent-bundle structures and global differentials. Let be smooth manifolds with (no compactness of is needed for this invariance) and let be a regular homotopy, that is, a smooth map whose restriction to every slice is an immersion. Then is a continuous path in for the weak compact-open topology, and consequently every homotopy invariant of formal data is constant along a regular homotopy: the path component of in does not depend on . For this invariant is the Gauss frame class of the preceding items (the difference class in when ); for it is the winding number, i.e. the rotation number. In particular two regularly homotopic immersions have homotopic formal data, which is the necessity half of every classification on this page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , smooth manifolds with and a regular homotopy .
A regular homotopy is a smooth with every slice an immersion, with and the prescribed immersions; the space carries the subspace topology of the weak compact-open topology. Regular homotopy of immersions, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions
The weak compact-open topology is generated by finitely many chart data, compact chart pieces and derivative tolerances. The weak compact-open C-infinity topology on mapping spaces
Under for the smooth tangent-bundle structures, the derivative map , , is continuous for the weak topologies. The derivative map is continuous
For compact , path components of are exactly the regular homotopy classes. A continuous family of immersions on a compact parameter domain can be smoothed through immersions relative to the parameter boundary provided its adjoint is smooth on a neighbourhood of that boundary times ; these assertions inherit the countable-choice assumption of the relative approximation theorem. Smooth families and path components in the weak topology, The Axiom of Countable Choice ()
Points joined by a continuous path lie in the same path component, and path components are the equivalence classes of the relation "joined by a path". Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints
The adjoint and evaluation correspondences for smooth families of maps identify a smooth with a map . Smooth families of maps and their evaluation maps, The exponential law: for a locally compact metric and any spaces and , transposition is a bijection between and with the compact-open topology
The angular winding invariant of formal circle immersions equals rotation number on derivatives. Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number.
For sphere sections with simply connected Stiefel fibre, the evaluation lemma identifies components by the difference class. The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration.
Proof
The adjoint , , is continuous for the weak compact-open topology directly from the definition: a basic weak neighbourhood of is determined by finitely many charts, compact pieces and tolerances on derivatives of order at most , and compactness with continuity gives a closed time interval about relative to on which lies in every prescribed target chart. For each of the finitely many occurring multi-indices the local expression is continuous on the compact set , hence uniformly continuous there, so for close to every one of the finitely many derivatives stays within its tolerance; therefore is continuous. Its image lies in because every slice of is an immersion by [F1].
Composition with the continuous derivative map [F3] gives the continuous path in , since the composite of continuous maps is continuous and takes values in by step 1.1.
A continuous path has all its points in a single path component [F5], so the path component of in is independent of ; hence every invariant of formal data that is constant on path components takes the same value at and , which is the necessity half of the classifications: regularly homotopic immersions have homotopic formal data.
The two instances: for , with , the path component of the formal data is detected by the difference class of the basepoint-evaluation lemma through the section-space description of , so the class in is constant along a regular homotopy; for , the corresponding invariant of a path component is the winding number, which for the derivative is the rotation number of the immersion, as established in Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number. The sphere difference-class conclusion is The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration. The compact-source identification of path components with regular homotopy classes used in the converse direction is [F4] with its countable-choice hypothesis; the invariance proved here uses steps 1.1–3.1 and inherits the structural countable-choice hypothesis of [F3]. No approximation or additional choice is used in this direct argument.
Whitney–Graustein classification of plane circle immersions
Statement
Assume . Let be oriented immersions of the circle (regular closed curves). Then and are regularly homotopic through immersions if and only if their rotation numbers agree, . Equivalently, the rotation number induces a bijection ; every integer is realised by a -fold round circle for , and by the Gerono lemniscate for . Reversing the domain negates the rotation number, so the once-traversed round circle cannot be turned inside out in the plane through immersions. A zero-rotation immersed circle is regularly homotopic to its reversal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Oriented immersions and their rotation numbers .
A regular homotopy is a smooth family of immersions with prescribed ends; the rotation number is for the normalised velocity, is invariant under regular reparametrisation and negates under reversal of the orientation of the domain. Regular homotopy of immersions, Rotation number of an immersed oriented circle in the plane
A regular homotopy gives a continuous path of formal data in , so every homotopy invariant of formal data, in particular the winding invariant, is constant along it. Regular homotopy preserves the formal Gauss class
For the winding invariant classifies formal immersions: two formal immersions lie in the same path component of exactly when their winding invariants agree, by degree, and the winding invariant of the derivative of an immersion is its rotation number. Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number
The derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence (), hence induces a bijection on path components; for compact sources path components of are regular homotopy classes, and the bijection matches regular homotopy classes with homotopy classes of formal immersions. The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes, Weak homotopy equivalence
Path components are the classes of the relation "joined by a path"; a continuous path stays in one path component. Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions
Proof
Necessity: let be a regular homotopy from to . By [F2] the formal data form a continuous path in , so the winding invariant is constant along it by [F5]; for the derivative of an immersion the winding invariant equals the rotation number by [F3]. Hence , and two curves with different rotation numbers are not regularly homotopic.
Sufficiency: assume . By [F3] the winding invariants of the derivatives and are equal, so these formal immersions lie in the same path component of , i.e. are homotopic through formal immersions. The derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence by [F4], hence a bijection on path components, so and lie in the same path component of ; by [F4] path components of for the compact source are exactly the regular homotopy classes, so and are regularly homotopic.
Consequently rotation number gives a bijection : necessity and sufficiency give well-definedness and injectivity. For , has velocity of norm and unit tangent , a constant rotation of , hence degree . For , take . Its velocity is , where never vanishes for real : if its first coordinate is zero its second is . The homotopy contracts this velocity loop to through nonzero vectors, so its degree is zero. Thus every integer occurs.
Reversing the domain gives for . The constant target rotation by preserves degree and domain reversal negates it, so the reverse of a curve of rotation number has rotation number . In particular the once-traversed round circle and its reverse have values and and are not regularly homotopic. The zero class is nonempty by step 3.1; its representatives are regularly homotopic to their reversals by step 2.1. Countable choice is inherited from [F4].
Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space
Statement
Assume . Let , let be the Stiefel manifold of orthonormal -frames, and let be the Stiefel bundle of the section-space proposition. Its sections are the fibrewise-injection part of the formal non-holonomic data, and the projection forgetting the underlying map and polar-normalizing the fibrewise injection is a homotopy equivalence, so path components of and of agree.
- If , then is simply connected, admits sections (because ), and the difference class of the evaluation lemma induces a non-canonical bijection . Since the Smale–Hirsch derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, the same set classifies regular homotopy classes of immersions: there is a non-canonical bijection between regular homotopy classes of immersions and , realised by the clutching difference class of the tangent framings.
- If , then and the difference class gives a non-canonical bijection ; in particular, if then all immersions are regularly homotopic.
- The instances used on this page: , , where with the rotation number as invariant; and , , where and hence all immersions are regularly homotopic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers , the sphere , the Stiefel bundle with fibre , and the space of its sections.
has fibre and its sections are isometric injections. Arbitrary smooth bundle monomorphisms over the identity correspond homeomorphically to sections of , whose section space strongly deformation retracts to by polar normalization. There is an actual homeomorphism ; contracting the first factor and normalizing the second give a homotopy equivalence to and a bijection of path components. Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections
Evaluation at a basepoint of the section space is a Hurewicz fibration; if the fibre is simply connected and , the difference class gives a non-canonical bijection ; if , and , then is path connected. The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration
is path connected for and simply connected for , and . Stiefel manifolds are connected in positive codimension and simply connected in codimension at least two, Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles
For the derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, and for compact sources it induces a bijection between regular homotopy classes of immersions and homotopy classes of formal immersions; a weak homotopy equivalence induces a bijection on path components. The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes, Weak homotopy equivalence, Formal immersion between smooth manifolds, Space of immersions and space of formal immersions
The normal bundle of the standard sphere is trivial with global frame (the radial field is nowhere zero and normal, since ), and the tangent-normal identity gives ; adding trivial summands gives for . Formal immersion gives the tangent normal-bundle identity, Whitney sums of vector bundles, A vector bundle is trivial if and only if it has a global frame, The tangent space of a regular level set is the kernel
, with embedded as ; the quotient map takes the first columns, and and are the special and full orthogonal groups. Stiefel spaces, Grassmannians, and tautological bundles, Orthogonal and special orthogonal Lie groups
For , : two formal immersions of into are in the same path component exactly when their winding invariants agree, and by degree. Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number
Proof
For the quotient identification in [F7], every orthonormal -frame extends to an orthonormal basis by finite-dimensional Gram–Schmidt. Two matrices have the same first columns exactly when they differ on the right by with . Thus the first-column map induces a continuous bijection ; it is a homeomorphism because the source is compact and the target Hausdorff. When , [F6] gives . Inclusion of the tangent summand is a smooth monomorphism; polar-normalizing it by [F1] gives an isometric section of , so .
Clause 1: if , then by [F3] the fibre is simply connected, and by step 1.1; hence [F2] gives the non-canonical bijection , the non-canonicity coming from the choice of trivialisation and of the section used to identify the difference classes. Passing to immersions: the derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence by [F5], so it induces a bijection , and [F1] identifies the latter with ; the resulting bijection between regular homotopy classes of immersions and is realised by the clutching difference class of the tangent framings.
Clause 2: if , then by [F3], using the unique final normal vector that completes a frame to a positive orthonormal basis. In particular the fibre is path connected, so [F2] and step 1.1 give the surjection . Its only possible identifications are the evaluation-loop action. Given a loop of evaluated frames based at , write for the uniquely completed oriented matrix and put . These matrices define a loop in with and . For every section with , the sections lift that loop and return to the same section . Thus every evaluation loop acts trivially on every component of the fixed-value section space. The exact-sequence component map is therefore injective as well as surjective, giving the asserted non-canonical bijection . By [F5] it also classifies regular homotopy components of immersions; in particular vanishing of this group gives a single component.
Clause 3: for , , clause 2 applies with ; the winding invariant of [F8] is a surjection that is also injective by the classification of formal immersions of the circle, so and [F5] gives with the rotation number as invariant. For , , clause 2 applies with and by [F4], so is path connected and all immersions are regularly homotopic. The Smale–Hirsch input carries its countable-choice hypothesis.
Standard and reflected two-sphere immersions have homotopic formal data in R^3
Statement
Let be the standard inclusion of the unit sphere and let , , be the antipodal map; equivalently replace by for a reflection of , which differs from by an orientation-preserving rotation of the target. Then the formal immersions and lie in the same path component of . More precisely, after moving their sections to a common basepoint value, the characteristic-disk model and transport in the evaluation lemma give based maps into . Their difference class in vanishes. This vanishing is the algebraic content of eversion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit sphere , the standard inclusion , the antipodal map , and the Stiefel bundle with fibre .
is an immersion (its differential is injective at every point), and is a diffeomorphism, so is an immersion with derivative ; the pairs and are formal immersions . Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps, Formal immersion between smooth manifolds
For , : has fibre ; bundle monomorphisms over the identity correspond to sections; is homotopy equivalent to via fibrewise polar normalization and the projection forgetting is a homotopy equivalence, so path components of correspond to path components of . Euclidean formal immersions are homotopy equivalent to Stiefel-bundle sections
The basepoint-evaluation lemma: for , evaluation at is a Hurewicz fibration on the section space; if the fibre is path connected, has and the section space is nonempty, then the section space is path connected. The basepoint evaluation of the Stiefel section space is a fibration
and ; is computed by based cubes, and is homeomorphic to while is the disjoint union of its two cosets of . The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes, Higher homotopy group by based cubes
Path components are the equivalence classes of the relation "joined by a continuous path", and a homotopy of formal data is a path in . Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints
Proof
has a section: the differential of the standard inclusion is a bundle monomorphism over , hence a section of by [F2]: for the standard metrics is already isometric. Thus . The fibre is path connected by [F5] and by [F4].
The section space is path connected: by the evaluation-fibration lemma [F3] applied with , , the long exact sequence makes a quotient of as soon as , and that group is trivial by [F4]; equivalently the evaluation fibration is surjective on path components and its based section space has . Hence any two sections of are joined by a path of sections.
Consequently any two formal immersions lie in the same path component of : path components are the classes of the relation "joined by a continuous path" and a homotopy of formal data is a path in [F6], so it suffices that by [F2] the space is homotopy equivalent to via fibrewise polar normalization and the first factor is contractible, so its path components are exactly those of , a single point by step 2.1. Applying this to the two formal immersions of [F1] gives that and are homotopic through formal immersions.
For the difference-class description, first move both frame sections to one prescribed basepoint value by evaluation path lifting, using the path-connected fibre in [F5]. The evaluation lemma [F3] pulls them to the closed characteristic disk with the same, possibly nonconstant boundary map, and transports both disk models along a contraction supplied by a reference section. They then descend to based maps into ; subtracting their classes in gives the difference obstruction. By [F4] this group vanishes, so the difference map is nullhomotopic and the two sections are homotopic, as already established in step 3.1. The two components of are homeomorphic to , so their second homotopy groups vanish too. Replacing by for a reflection changes the target by a rotation relative to : for take , and for any reflection is likewise a rotation. A path of target rotations from to gives a homotopy of the corresponding formal data. Hence the reflected embedding has the same formal component as .
Sphere eversion
Statement
Assume for the existence and classification assertions. The standard embedding is regularly homotopic, through immersions , to its inside-out reflection (equivalently to for a reflection of ). More precisely, every two immersions are regularly homotopic: the space is path connected, and a regular homotopy from to cannot be chosen through embeddings (this last assertion uses AC, through the Jordan–Brouwer separation theorem).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit sphere , the standard embedding , the antipodal map , a reflection of , the space with the weak compact-open topology, and the formal-immersion space .
The formal data of and of are homotopic: they lie in the same path component of , and the difference class in vanishes. Standard and reflected two-sphere immersions have homotopic formal data in R^3
The derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence (, compact closed source), hence induces a bijection on path components; for the compact source , path components of are the regular homotopy classes. The Smale–Hirsch immersion theorem, Regular homotopy classes of immersions are formal homotopy classes, Weak homotopy equivalence
All immersions are regularly homotopic, since and ; equivalently the immersion space is path connected by the classification theorem. Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space, The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes
A regular homotopy is a smooth family whose every slice is an immersion; a homotopy through embeddings is a smooth family whose every slice is injective and immersive, hence an embedding of the compact sphere. Regular homotopy of immersions, Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
Jordan–Brouwer separation (AC): the image of every embedding has exactly two complementary components, one bounded and one unbounded, with common boundary the image. Jordan–Brouwer separation, The Axiom of Choice
The divergence theorem for bounded Euclidean domains: for a bounded domain with boundary and the field , , so the flux of through the outward-oriented boundary equals ; with the opposite orientation the flux is . Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Proof
and are regularly homotopic: by [F1] their formal data lie in one path component of , and the derivative map is a weak homotopy equivalence, hence a bijection on path components by [F2]; path components of are the regular homotopy classes by [F2], so there is a regular homotopy from to . Follow this homotopy by , where is a smooth rotation path from to . For a reflection in a plane with unit normal , fixes and rotates by , so rotation through supplies this path. Reparametrizing both paths to be constant near their endpoints makes their concatenation smooth, with initial map and final map .
is path connected: by [F3] every two immersions of into are regularly homotopic, and regular homotopies are paths in the immersion space by [F4].
No regular homotopy from to can be chosen through embeddings. Suppose were such a family with every slice an embedding. Define the flux , where is the -form of the field , that is, the integral over the parametrised surface of in positively oriented local coordinates. The integrand depends continuously on and is compact, so is continuous. For each , is a smooth embedding of the compact sphere, so by [F5] its image bounds a compact region ; the divergence theorem in the form of [F6] identifies with , the sign being or according to the orientation of the parametrisation, so for every ; a continuous nonzero function on has constant sign.
Evaluating the two ends: for with the positively oriented coordinates of as the boundary of the unit ball, is the outward-oriented flux form of through the unit sphere, whose integral is the volume of the unit ball by [F6]. For or , the chain rule gives , and the identity for either orthogonal map with determinant shows that the pulled-back flux form changes sign: . Hence , contradicting the constant sign forced in step 1.3. Therefore no homotopy from to through embeddings exists, every regular homotopy between them has non-injective slices, and the inside/outside labelling necessarily changes along any eversion. The existence assertion of the theorem is step 1.1 and the path-connectedness is step 1.2; the Jordan–Brouwer input of step 1.3 carries AC, while the existence and classification assertions inherit countable choice from Smale–Hirsch.
Sphere eversion cannot be an isotopy through embeddings
Remark
Assume AC, including the countable-choice hypotheses of the eversion and divergence suppliers. No homotopy from to (or to ) through embeddings of into exists, so every eversion contains slices that are not injective; self-intersections are unavoidable. The invariant is the coorientation: an embedding of into bounds a compact complementary region (indeed a ball, by Alexander's theorem, which the argument below does not need; Jordan–Brouwer separation supplies only the existence of the bounded region), and the sign of the parametrisation relative to the boundary orientation of that region is locally constant along a continuous family of embeddings: the proof below exhibits it as the sign of a continuous flux integral, so continuity of the regions themselves is never invoked. Thus has the positively oriented parametrisation with respect to the outward normal while and have the opposite sign, and the two lie in different path components of the space of embeddings . Equivalently, an ambient isotopy of preserves the side of the image, whereas eversion reverses the inside/outside labelling. Regular homotopy is strictly coarser than isotopy here: the two maps are in one path component of by the eversion theorem and in different path components of the embedding space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit sphere , the standard embedding , the antipodal map , a reflection of with for a rotation , and the family of slices of a hypothetical homotopy through embeddings.
By the eversion theorem, and are regularly homotopic through immersions, and every regular homotopy between them has non-injective slices; a homotopy through embeddings is a homotopy whose slices are injective immersions of the compact sphere, hence embeddings. Sphere eversion, Smooth embeddings, An injective immersion from a compact manifold is an embedding
A regular homotopy has every slice immersive; embeddings are the injective immersions, and the orientation of the parametrisation relative to the bounded side is the coorientation sign of the remark. Regular homotopy of immersions, Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps, Orientable manifolds
Jordan–Brouwer separation (AC): the image of an embedding has exactly two complementary components, one bounded and one unbounded, with common boundary the image. Jordan–Brouwer separation, The Axiom of Choice
The divergence theorem on a bounded Euclidean domain: the flux of the field through the boundary equals for the outward orientation and for the inward orientation. Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain
Proof
Suppose is a continuous path in the weak space of embeddings from to or . For each the slice is an embedding of the compact sphere and bounds a bounded region by [F3]; define the flux of the field through the parametrised surface . Continuity of this path controls the values and first spatial derivatives uniformly on a finite chart cover of the compact sphere. Therefore the integrand is continuous in and hence bounded and uniformly continuous, so is continuous; and by [F4], with the sign given by the orientation of the parametrisation relative to the outward normal of , so for all and the sign of is constant.
At the ends: for in positively oriented coordinates of the unit sphere, the flux of is the volume of the unit ball, so ; for with or , the chain rule and with give . This contradicts the constant sign of step 1.1, so no homotopy through embeddings from to exists, and by [F1] every regular homotopy from to has non-injective slices: eversion necessarily produces self-intersections. AC is inherited from Jordan–Brouwer and from the eversion assertion; it also implies the countable-choice assumption of the divergence theorem. The sign computation is elementary.
The two path components just separated are components of the space of embeddings, while the eversion theorem puts the two maps in one component of the space of immersions; this is the precise sense in which regular homotopy is coarser than isotopy for the sphere in .
Regular homotopy allows self-intersections but never rank drop
Remark
A regular homotopy of immersions requires every slice to be immersive (Regular homotopy of immersions, Smooth families of maps and their evaluation maps): the rank of is at every point of every slice (Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps), and no slice may contain a point of rank drop, a cusp of the parametrised family or a point whose derivative degenerates.
Self-intersections, by contrast, are permitted: an immersion may identify two distinct points with as long as the differential is injective at each point. Their tangent images may coincide; transversality is not required by the immersion condition. During an eversion of in the slices must acquire self-intersections and cannot be embeddings (Sphere eversion cannot be an isotopy through embeddings), while no slice may have a rank drop, so the two phenomena are logically independent.
For a fixed smooth map, the set of source points where its differential has full rank is open (The immersion and submersion loci are open). This is a statement about the source, rather than about a topology on a space of maps. A smooth family is a regular homotopy exactly when every slice is an immersion; immersive slices for do not guarantee an immersive final slice.
The sphere immersion groups are algebraic-topology computations, not differential-topology constructions
Remark
The homotopy-theoretic inputs used on this page — (The second homotopy group of SO(3) vanishes) via the quaternion double cover and the covering isomorphism on for ; via circle degree (Formal immersions of the circle in the plane are classified by the winding number); the Stiefel connectivities for and for (Stiefel manifolds are connected in positive codimension and simply connected in codimension at least two), and the higher homotopy exact sequences of the fibrations — are algebraic-topology computations owned by the prerequisite pages on higher homotopy groups and cofiber sequences, fibrations and homotopy exact sequences, covering spaces and lifting, and the Hurewicz, Whitehead, Freudenthal and CW-approximation theorems. Here they are consumed as the values of and in the sense of Higher homotopy group by based cubes; Smale's classification of sphere immersions in Euclidean space states the classification in terms of them.
This page contributes only the differential-topological reduction: the Smale–Hirsch weak homotopy equivalence (from the predecessor page), the identification of formal data with Stiefel sections, and the clutching difference class that turns the classification into these groups. No new homotopy-theoretic machinery is minted here, and conversely the groups remain algebraic-topology inputs; each use is recorded in the dependencies of the items above.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §1 “Vector bundle obstructions to embeddings and immersions” and §2.1–2.2 “Foundational work of Whitney, Smale, and Hirsch”
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 9: Immersions into Euclidean space, from Smale to Cohen (notes by M. Hoyois)
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §1 and §2.1
- John Francis, The h-Principle, Lecture 10: Classifying immersions of spheres, after Smale (notes by A. Beaudry)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §4.2–4.3 (fibrations, long exact sequence, evaluation fibrations of mapping spaces)
- John Milnor and James Stasheff, Characteristic Classes, §5 (Stiefel and Grassmann manifolds and their connectivity)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (covering isomorphisms on higher homotopy groups) and §4.2–4.3 (fibrations, long exact sequence, evaluation fibrations of mapping spaces)
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (covering isomorphisms on higher homotopy groups) and §4.2–4.3
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §2.1 eversion paragraph
- Hassler Whitney, On regular closed curves in the plane, Compositio Mathematica 4 (1937)
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §2.1
- Hassler Whitney, On regular closed curves in the plane, Compositio Mathematica 4 (1937), pp. 276–284
- Ralph L. Cohen, Immersions of Manifolds and Homotopy Theory (Harvard CMSA Math-Science Literature Lecture write-up, June 30 2022), §2.1 Theorem 5
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §4.2–4.3 and the smooth Jordan–Brouwer separation of spheres in $\mathbb R^3$
- Allen Hatcher, Notes on Basic 3-Manifold Topology, Theorem 1.1 (every smoothly embedded 2-sphere in R^3 bounds a ball)