How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Conformal Mapping, Branches, and the Schwarz Lemma
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Harmonic Functions and the Poisson Integral
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Isolated Singularities and Laurent Series
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Families and Montel's Theorem
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Argument Principle and Rouché's Theorem
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Residue Theorem and the Evaluation of Real Integrals
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Riemann Mapping Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page is the point where the analytic, homological, and homotopy notions of simple connectivity for plane domains are finally identified. Most of the equivalences already live on earlier pages: the global Cauchy page handles primitives, zero periods, holomorphic logarithms, and holomorphic roots; the harmonic page handles global harmonic conjugates on homologically simply connected domains; and the topology pages provide the fundamental-group and contractibility language.
The new work here is the bridge layer. First comes the homotopy form of Cauchy's theorem, which turns endpoint-fixed path homotopies into equality of holomorphic line integrals. Then come the specifically planar implications between trivial fundamental group, null homology, and connected complement in the Riemann sphere, together with the contractibility bridge and the winding number/degree dictionary for loops in . The grand theorem at the end records the whole implication graph in one place and fixes the unqualified convention "simply connected" for plane domains from this page forward.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have equal holomorphic line integrals
Statement
Let be open, let be holomorphic, and let be rectifiable paths with the same endpoints. If and are path-homotopic relative to the endpoints, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set , a holomorphic function , two rectifiable paths with the same endpoints, and an endpoint-fixed path homotopy from to .
A path homotopy relative to the endpoints is a continuous map with , , and both side edges fixed at the common endpoints (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies inside a single member of the cover).
Every holomorphic function on an open star-shaped subset of has a primitive there (Every holomorphic function on a star-shaped domain has a primitive).
If is a primitive of a continuous on an open set containing the trace of a rectifiable contour, then the contour integral of is the endpoint increment of (The line integral of a continuous function admitting a primitive is that primitive's endpoint increment along every rectifiable path).
If is open and star-shaped, is holomorphic on , and is a closed rectifiable contour in , then (Cauchy's theorem on a star-shaped domain: every closed rectifiable contour integral of a holomorphic function is zero).
Reversal changes the sign of a complex line integral, and concatenation adds integrals (Complex line integrals change sign under reversal and add under concatenation).
Reversal and concatenation of contours are the standard orientation-changing and gluing operations on rectifiable paths (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation).
Proof
By [L1], the image of the homotopy square lies in . For each point of , openness of gives an open disc centered at , and the sets form an open cover of the compact square . By [L2], there is such that every subset of the square of diameter less than lies in some . Choose with .
For , write Each cell has diameter , so step 1.1 places inside an open disc . Put Since every disc is convex, the straight segments from to , from to , from to , and from to all lie in . Let be the closed polygonal contour obtained by traversing those four segments in that order.
Because is star-shaped, [L5] gives Also [L3] gives a primitive of on .
Summing the zero integrals from step 3.1 over all cells, every interior polygon edge appears once in each orientation, so [L6] and [L7] cancel all interior contributions. The surviving outer boundary is the bottom polygonal path built from the straight segments joining to , the top polygonal path built in the forward direction from the straight segments joining to but occurring in the outer boundary with reverse orientation, and the two side edges. By [L1] both side edges are constant, and for a constant path one has , so [L6] gives , hence . Therefore
For each , the bottom subpath and the chord segment from to both lie in . Since is a primitive of on , [L4] gives the same endpoint increment for both, so their integrals are equal. Summing over and using [L6] yields The same argument with the top-row discs gives
Combining steps 4.1 and 4.2 gives as required.
A closed contour path-homotopic to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function
Statement
Let be open, let be holomorphic, and let be a closed rectifiable contour. If is path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to a constant loop in , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open set , a holomorphic function , a closed rectifiable contour , and a constant loop to which is path-homotopic relative to the endpoints.
A path homotopy relative to the endpoints keeps the two endpoint values fixed throughout the homotopy (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).
Endpoint-fixed homotopic rectifiable paths have equal holomorphic line integrals (Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have equal holomorphic line integrals).
The contour integral of a constant integrand over any contour is that constant times the endpoint displacement (The contour integral of a constant c is c times the endpoint displacement).
A closed contour has the same initial and terminal point, and constant paths are legitimate contours (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation).
Proof
The Given and [L1] place and the constant loop under the hypotheses of [L2]. Therefore
Because is constant, one has for every . Since [L4] makes a closed contour, [L3] gives Combining this with step 1.1 proves .
For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree
Statement
Let be a closed rectifiable loop with , and define
Under the standard homeomorphism from to the unit circle, the loop determines a based loop in at , and
Equivalently, the winding number of about is exactly the integer that classifies the normalized circle loop of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed rectifiable loop with .
For a closed complex contour in and a continuous argument of about , one has (The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by , The winding number of a closed contour about a point off its trace).
The map is a homeomorphism from to the unit circle and sends to ( is a homeomorphism from to the unit circle).
The degree of a based loop in is the endpoint of its unique lift to beginning at (The degree of a based circle loop).
The unit circle has fundamental group under the standard trigonometric normalization (The trigonometric loops give ).
Proof
Because for every , the normalized map is a continuous loop in the unit circle based at . Using the homeomorphism of [L2], regard the same loop as a based loop at . Let be its lift with , and define .
By the definition of in [L2], the lift from step 1.1 supplies a continuous argument. [step 1.1, L1, L2, algebra] Hence so is a continuous argument of about . Therefore [L1] gives
Since is exactly the degree of by [L3], step 2.1 shows , which is the asserted degree of the normalized circle loop of . Fact [L4] records that this is the same integer that classifies the loop class in the usual convention.
A plane domain with trivial fundamental group is homologically simply connected
Statement
Let be a complex domain. If every based loop in represents the identity class in its fundamental group, then is homologically simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain whose fundamental group is trivial at every basepoint.
A based loop class is trivial exactly when the loop is path-homotopic to the constant loop at its basepoint (Based loops and the fundamental group).
A closed rectifiable contour path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function (A closed contour path-homotopic to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function).
For a complex domain, homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the condition that every cycle has zero integral against every holomorphic function (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).
A complex chain is a finite integer linear combination of contours, and its integral is the corresponding finite sum of contour integrals (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles, Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).
A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of , so under the usual identification with it is polygonally connected (A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of , For an open subset of , connectedness, path-connectedness and polygonal connectedness are equivalent, Polygonal paths and polygonally connected subsets of ).
Continuous piecewise- paths are rectifiable, and reversal changes sign while concatenation adds for complex line integrals (A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces, Complex line integrals change sign under reversal and add under concatenation).
Proof
Let be a cycle with trace in , and let be holomorphic on . Choose a basepoint . Let For each , [L5] gives a polygonal path in from to ; by [L6] each is a rectifiable contour.
Fix with , and write and . The contour is a based loop at . By the triviality hypothesis, its loop class is the identity, so [L1] makes path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to the constant loop at . Applying [L2] and then [L6] gives hence
By [L4] and step 1.2, Grouping the two finite sums by endpoint and using the boundary formula from [L4], this becomes because is a cycle. Thus for every holomorphic and every cycle in .
The criterion in [L3] now shows that is homologically simply connected.
A connected spherical complement forces every cycle in the domain to be null-homologous
Statement
Let be a complex domain. If is connected, then every cycle with trace in is null-homologous in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain with connected spherical complement, and a cycle whose trace lies in .
The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes on all sufficiently large points of the plane (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).
A cycle with trace in an open set is null-homologous there exactly when its index vanishes at every point of the complement of that open set (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set).
Proof
Since , the index is defined for every . By [L1], the function is locally constant on , and there is with whenever . Thus the subset [given, L1, construct] contains together with a punctured neighborhood of in the sphere.
The set is open in by the local constancy from [L1], and its complement in is open for the same reason. Since is connected and is nonempty by step 1.1, it follows that [step 1.1, L1, algebra] Therefore for every .
By [L2], the vanishing from step 2.1 is exactly the statement that is null-homologous in .
A homologically simply connected plane domain has connected spherical complement
Statement
Let be a homologically simply connected complex domain. Then is connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homologically simply connected complex domain .
A homologically simply connected complex domain is a complex domain in which every cycle with trace in the domain has index at every omitted point (Homologically simply connected complex domains, A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of ).
A compact subset of an open Euclidean set lies in the interior of a compact Jordan set contained in that open set, and that Jordan set may be chosen as a finite union of closed grid rectangles (A compact subset of an open Euclidean set has a compact Jordan neighborhood inside that open set).
Chain integrals and indices are additive in the chain, reversing orientation negates the index, and a sum of cycles is a cycle (Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it).
For a closed contour, the winding number about a point off the trace equals the increment of a continuous argument divided by (The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by ).
The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).
Proof
Suppose, toward a contradiction, that is disconnected. Then for disjoint nonempty closed subsets . Since , relabel so that . Because the Riemann sphere is a metric space, the disjoint closed sets and have disjoint open neighbourhoods and in with and . The inclusion forces , so is compact in and . Hence .
Apply [L2] to the compact set , viewing as . It gives a finite union of closed grid rectangles with . Give each rectangle boundary its positive orientation, sum those boundary chains, and cancel every interior edge with its opposite by [L3]. Let be the remaining chain. Then is a cycle, and its trace is the frontier of , so .
Let lie on no grid line. Exactly one grid cell of contains . Along the positively oriented boundary of , the continuous argument of increases by , while along the boundary of every other grid cell it has increment because lies outside that cell. Therefore [L4] gives winding number for about and for every other cell boundary, and additivity from [L3] yields .
Fix . Because , choose a disc and then choose on no grid line. The disc misses , so local constancy from [L5] and step 3.1 give .
The point lies in , while step 2.1 gives . Step 4.1 yields , so [L1] says that is not null-homologous in , contradicting the homological simple connectivity of . Therefore the assumption of step 1.1 was false, and is connected.
The global Cauchy equivalences give primitives, zero periods, and holomorphic logarithms, which in turn give holomorphic roots
Remark
The genuinely new work on this page is the bridge between planar homotopy, planar complement topology, and the older homological criterion. The analytic equivalences themselves were already proved on Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain:
- every cycle has zero period against every holomorphic function;
- every holomorphic function has a primitive;
- every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm.
The one-way root consequence is already present too: once the logarithm exists, A nonvanishing holomorphic function on such a domain has holomorphic roots of every positive order gives holomorphic roots of every positive order. The grand theorem below cites those results instead of restating their proofs.
A plane domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every harmonic function has a global conjugate
Statement
Let be a complex domain. Then the following are equivalent.
- is homologically simply connected.
- Every harmonic function has a harmonic conjugate on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex domain .
On a homologically simply connected complex domain, every harmonic function has a harmonic conjugate (Harmonic conjugates exist on homologically simply connected plane domains).
For a complex domain, homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the statement that for every point the function has a primitive on (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).
A harmonic conjugate of a harmonic function is a real-valued function such that is holomorphic (Harmonic conjugates, Plane harmonic functions).
If and are holomorphic with , then (A holomorphic logarithm is a primitive of the logarithmic derivative).
The complex exponential is entire with derivative itself, satisfies , and compositions and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, The chain rule for complex derivatives, Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).
A nonconstant holomorphic function on a complex domain is open (Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions).
Proof
Assume condition 1. Then [L1] gives condition 2 immediately.
Assume condition 2. Fix and define [L3, given, choose, construct] Direct differentiation gives and then on , because . So is harmonic on . By condition 2 and [L3], choose a harmonic conjugate on and put which is holomorphic on .
The function [step 1.2, L5, L6, algebra] is holomorphic on by [L5]. Its modulus is so lies on the unit circle. By [L6], cannot be nonconstant, hence it is constant: Therefore satisfies on .
By [L4], each from step 2.1 is a primitive of on . Since was arbitrary, condition 4 of [L2] holds for , so [L2] gives condition 1. Together with step 1.1, this proves the equivalence.
A homologically simply connected plane domain is either the plane or conformally equivalent to the disc
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a homologically simply connected complex domain. Then either , or there is a biholomorphic map from onto the unit disc .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a homologically simply connected complex domain .
A homologically simply connected complex domain is, in particular, a complex domain (Homologically simply connected complex domains).
Under the Axiom of Choice, every proper homologically simply connected complex domain is conformally equivalent to the unit disc (Every proper homologically simply connected plane domain is conformally equivalent to the unit disc).
Proof
By [L1], is a complex domain. If , then the first alternative holds and there is nothing more to prove.
If , then is a proper homologically simply connected complex domain, so [L2] applies and gives a biholomorphic map . This is exactly the second alternative.
Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the dichotomy.
A plane domain homeomorphic to the plane or to the disc is contractible
Statement
Let be a topological space homeomorphic either to the complex plane or to the unit disc . Then is contractible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A homeomorphism , where is either or .
A nonempty convex subset of is contractible (Every nonempty convex subset of is contractible).
Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).
A space is contractible when every continuous map from it is nullhomotopic (Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces).
Proof
Both and the unit disc are convex subsets of , so [L1] makes contractible. In particular, the identity map is homotopic to a constant map for some .
Postcompose the homotopy from step 1.1 by and precompose it by . By [L2], this yields a homotopy from [step 1.1, L2, algebra] to the constant map at . Thus is nullhomotopic.
Let be any continuous map into any topological space . Postcomposing the nullhomotopy from step 2.1 by and using [L2] again shows that [step 2.1, L2, L3] is homotopic to the constant map at . Hence every continuous map out of is nullhomotopic, so [L3] makes contractible. ∎
A contractible space has trivial fundamental group
Statement
Let be a contractible topological space and let . Then is the trivial group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A contractible space and a basepoint .
A nonempty topological space is contractible exactly when its identity map is nullhomotopic (Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces, A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic).
Based loops at are identified up to path homotopy relative to the endpoints, and the class of the constant loop is the identity of (Based loops and the fundamental group, Loop classes form the group under concatenation).
Proof
By [L1], there are a point and a homotopy from to the constant map . Evaluating at the chosen basepoint gives a path from to .
Let . Define by The three pieces are continuous and agree on the seams because , so is continuous. Also for every , so is a path homotopy relative to the endpoints between loops at . At it is , and at it is . Hence Since is the identity by [L2], this gives .
Define by The three pieces are continuous and agree on the seams, so is continuous. Also for every , while and . Thus by [L2], and step 2.1 yields .
Every loop class at is therefore the identity, so is trivial.
For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a complex domain. The following conditions are equivalent.
- is connected.
- is homologically simply connected.
- The fundamental group of is trivial.
- Every holomorphic function on has a primitive.
- For every holomorphic on and every closed rectifiable contour in ,
- Every nowhere-zero holomorphic function on has a holomorphic logarithm.
- Every nowhere-zero holomorphic function on has a holomorphic square root.
- Every harmonic function on has a harmonic conjugate.
- Either , or is conformally equivalent to .
- Either is homeomorphic to , or is homeomorphic to .
- is contractible.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a complex domain .
Condition 1 implies condition 2 and condition 2 implies condition 1 (A connected spherical complement forces every cycle in the domain to be null-homologous, A homologically simply connected plane domain has connected spherical complement).
The global Cauchy page already makes homological simple connectivity equivalent to the primitive clause, the holomorphic-logarithm clause, and the omitted-point primitive clause (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain, The global Cauchy equivalences give primitives, zero periods, and holomorphic logarithms, which in turn give holomorphic roots).
On a homologically simply connected domain every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has holomorphic roots of every positive order (A nonvanishing holomorphic function on such a domain has holomorphic roots of every positive order).
Homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the global harmonic-conjugate condition (A plane domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every harmonic function has a global conjugate).
Under the Axiom of Choice, homological simple connectivity implies the plane-or-disc alternative (A homologically simply connected plane domain is either the plane or conformally equivalent to the disc).
A domain homeomorphic to the plane or the disc is contractible (A plane domain homeomorphic to the plane or to the disc is contractible).
A contractible space has trivial fundamental group (A contractible space has trivial fundamental group).
Trivial fundamental group implies homological simple connectivity for plane domains (A plane domain with trivial fundamental group is homologically simply connected).
For a continuous function on a complex domain, having a primitive is equivalent to vanishing on every closed rectifiable contour (For a continuous function on a complex domain, endpoint independence, zero closed-contour integrals, and existence of a primitive are equivalent).
Every complex contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm along that contour (Every contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm, unique up to a constant in ).
For a closed contour and , one has and also for every continuous argument of along (The winding number of a closed contour about a point off its trace, The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by ).
Proof
By [L1], conditions 1 and 2 are equivalent. By [L2], conditions 2, 4, and 6 are equivalent. By [L4], conditions 2 and 8 are equivalent. By [L9], conditions 4 and 5 are equivalent.
Condition 2 implies condition 7 by [L3]. Conversely, assume condition 7. Fix and a closed rectifiable contour . Applying condition 7 repeatedly to the nowhere-zero holomorphic function produces, for every , a nowhere-zero holomorphic function on with . By [L10], the closed contour admits a continuous logarithm ; write . Then is a continuous logarithm of along , so [L11] gives Applying [L11] again to shows that is an integer. Therefore The only integer divisible by every power of is , so . By [L11], this is equivalent to Since and were arbitrary and is continuous on , [L9] makes admit a primitive on . Thus condition 2 holds by [L2], and conditions 2 and 7 are equivalent.
Assume condition 2. By [L5], condition 9 follows. Any conformal equivalence is in particular a homeomorphism, so condition 9 implies condition 10. Then [L6] gives condition 11, [L7] gives condition 3, and [L8] returns to condition 2. Thus [L5, L6, L7, L8]
Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 connect every listed clause to condition 2, so all eleven conditions are equivalent.
Under the grand theorem's Choice hypothesis, plane-domain simple connectivity means any grand-equivalent clause
Before this page, the track deliberately said homologically simply connected whenever only the cycle/index criterion had been proved. After For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent, and under its Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis, that caution is no longer needed for plane domains: all of the analytic, homological, homotopic, conformal, and contractibility clauses on the theorem are equivalent.
Accordingly, whenever this track invokes that theorem or a corollary derived from it, a simply connected plane domain means a complex domain satisfying any, and hence every, clause of the grand theorem under the same Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a complex domain. Then is simply connected if and only if is connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a complex domain .
Under the grand equivalence theorem, connected spherical complement, homological simple connectivity, and trivial fundamental group are equivalent conditions on (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
Connected spherical complement implies null homology, and null homology implies connected spherical complement (A connected spherical complement forces every cycle in the domain to be null-homologous, A homologically simply connected plane domain has connected spherical complement).
Proof
If is connected, then [L2] gives homological simple connectivity, and [L1] identifies that with simple connectivity under the current Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis.
If is simply connected, then [L1] places it under the grand-equivalent conditions, so it is homologically simply connected; [L2] then gives connected spherical complement.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both directions.
Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers
Statement
For a based loop at , let and define
Then is the standard isomorphism
If is rectifiable, then
Thus the analytic winding number of any rectifiable representative is the integer classifying its loop class.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A based loop at .
For a rectifiable based loop, the winding number about equals the degree of its normalized circle loop (For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree).
Radial normalization is a deformation retraction of onto the unit circle (For , radial normalisation is a deformation retraction of onto ).
A deformation retract induces mutually inverse fundamental-group isomorphisms between the retract and the ambient space (A retract induces an injection on fundamental groups, and a deformation retract induces an isomorphism).
The unit circle has fundamental group with the standard trigonometric generator (The trigonometric loops give ).
Proof
Let and let be radial normalization, . Specializing [L2] to and applying [L3], the induced map is an isomorphism. For the given loop , its image under is the class of the normalized circle loop .
Fact [L4] identifies the class of in with the integer . Hence is exactly the composite of the isomorphism from step 1.1 with the standard identification , and is therefore the standard isomorphism If is rectifiable, [L1] gives .
Once the cited Riemann mapping theorem is granted, the new bridge implications in the grand equivalence are choice-free
The only place where the grand theorem imports a choice-bearing result is the existing Riemann mapping supplier used in clause 9. Everything else newly proved on this page is independent of that step: homotopy invariance of line integrals, the null-homotopy version of Cauchy's theorem, the complement-connectedness criterion, the harmonic-conjugate bridge, the contractibility bridge, and the winding-number/degree dictionary.
So, relative to the already-cited choice strength of the Riemann mapping page recorded in Choice strength used in the extremal proof of the Riemann mapping theorem, the new bridge implications here are choice-free.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 3, §5
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §2.1
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Ch. 4, §4.1
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §4.4
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §§4.2-4.3
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Ch. 4, §4.3
- Jeremy Orloff, MIT 18.04 Topic 5
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 8
- Matthias Weber, Complex Analysis, Theorem 5.2.6
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Section 0
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Proposition 1.17
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §§4.2-4.4
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 3, §§5-6
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §4.2
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 4.3.7
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Exercise 4.1.7
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Theorem 1.7