Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

13 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 6 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page is the point where the analytic, homological, and homotopy notions of simple connectivity for plane domains are finally identified. Most of the equivalences already live on earlier pages: the global Cauchy page handles primitives, zero periods, holomorphic logarithms, and holomorphic roots; the harmonic page handles global harmonic conjugates on homologically simply connected domains; and the topology pages provide the fundamental-group and contractibility language.

The new work here is the bridge layer. First comes the homotopy form of Cauchy's theorem, which turns endpoint-fixed path homotopies into equality of holomorphic line integrals. Then come the specifically planar implications between trivial fundamental group, null homology, and connected complement in the Riemann sphere, together with the contractibility bridge and the winding number/degree dictionary for loops in C×. The grand theorem at the end records the whole implication graph in one place and fixes the unqualified convention "simply connected" for plane domains from this page forward.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have equal holomorphic line integrals

Statement

Let ΩC be open, let f:ΩC be holomorphic, and let γ0,γ1:[0,1]Ω be rectifiable paths with the same endpoints. If γ0 and γ1 are path-homotopic relative to the endpoints, then

γ0f(z)dz=γ1f(z)dz.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set Ω, a holomorphic function f:ΩC, two rectifiable paths γ0,γ1:[0,1]Ω with the same endpoints, and an endpoint-fixed path homotopy H:[0,1]×[0,1]Ω from γ0 to γ1.

[L1]

A path homotopy relative to the endpoints is a continuous map H:I×IΩ with H(s,0)=γ0(s), H(s,1)=γ1(s), and both side edges fixed at the common endpoints (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).

[L3]

Every holomorphic function on an open star-shaped subset of C has a primitive there (Every holomorphic function on a star-shaped domain has a primitive).

[L4]

If F is a primitive of a continuous g on an open set containing the trace of a rectifiable contour, then the contour integral of g is the endpoint increment of F (The line integral of a continuous function admitting a primitive is that primitive's endpoint increment along every rectifiable path).

[L5]

If UC is open and star-shaped, f is holomorphic on U, and σ is a closed rectifiable contour in U, then σf(z)dz=0 (Cauchy's theorem on a star-shaped domain: every closed rectifiable contour integral of a holomorphic function is zero).

[L6]

Reversal changes the sign of a complex line integral, and concatenation adds integrals (Complex line integrals change sign under reversal and add under concatenation).

[L7]

Reversal and concatenation of contours are the standard orientation-changing and gluing operations on rectifiable paths (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the image of the homotopy square lies in Ω. For each point x of [0,1]2, openness of Ω gives an open disc DxΩ centered at H(x), and the sets H1(Dx) form an open cover of the compact square [0,1]2. By [L2], there is δ>0 such that every subset of the square of diameter less than δ lies in some H1(Dx). Choose N with 2/N<δ.

givenL1L2choose
2.1

For 1j,kN, write Qjk=[j1N,jN]×[k1N,kN]. Each cell has diameter 2/N<δ, so step 1.1 places H[Qjk] inside an open disc DjkΩ. Put ajk=H(j1N,k1N),bjk=H(jN,k1N),cjk=H(jN,kN),djk=H(j1N,kN). Since every disc is convex, the straight segments from ajk to bjk, from bjk to cjk, from cjk to djk, and from djk to ajk all lie in Djk. Let Pjk be the closed polygonal contour obtained by traversing those four segments in that order.

step 1.1construct
3.1

Because Djk is star-shaped, [L5] gives Pjkf(z)dz=0. Also [L3] gives a primitive Fjk of f on Djk.

step 2.1L3L5
4.1

Summing the zero integrals from step 3.1 over all cells, every interior polygon edge appears once in each orientation, so [L6] and [L7] cancel all interior contributions. The surviving outer boundary is the bottom polygonal path P0 built from the straight segments joining γ0((j1)/N) to γ0(j/N), the top polygonal path P1 built in the forward direction from the straight segments joining γ1((j1)/N) to γ1(j/N) but occurring in the outer boundary with reverse orientation, and the two side edges. By [L1] both side edges are constant, and for a constant path s one has ss=s, so [L6] gives sfdz=ssfdz=2sfdz, hence sfdz=0. Therefore P0f(z)dz=P1f(z)dz.

L1L6L7step 3.1algebra
4.2

For each 1jN, the bottom subpath γ0[(j1)/N,j/N] and the chord segment from γ0((j1)/N) to γ0(j/N) both lie in Dj1. Since Fj1 is a primitive of f on Dj1, [L4] gives the same endpoint increment for both, so their integrals are equal. Summing over j and using [L6] yields γ0f(z)dz=P0f(z)dz. The same argument with the top-row discs DjN gives γ1f(z)dz=P1f(z)dz.

step 3.1L4L6algebra
5.1

Combining steps 4.1 and 4.2 gives γ0f(z)dz=γ1f(z)dz, as required.

step 4.1step 4.2
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A closed contour path-homotopic to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function

Statement

Let ΩC be open, let f:ΩC be holomorphic, and let γ:[0,1]Ω be a closed rectifiable contour. If γ is path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to a constant loop in Ω, then

γf(z)dz=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open set Ω, a holomorphic function f:ΩC, a closed rectifiable contour γ:[0,1]Ω, and a constant loop c:[0,1]Ω to which γ is path-homotopic relative to the endpoints.

[L1]

A path homotopy relative to the endpoints keeps the two endpoint values fixed throughout the homotopy (Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints).

[L2]

Endpoint-fixed homotopic rectifiable paths have equal holomorphic line integrals (Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have equal holomorphic line integrals).

[L3]

The contour integral of a constant integrand over any contour is that constant times the endpoint displacement (The contour integral of a constant c is c times the endpoint displacement).

[L4]

A closed contour has the same initial and terminal point, and constant paths are legitimate contours (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The Given and [L1] place γ and the constant loop c under the hypotheses of [L2]. Therefore γf(z)dz=cf(z)dz.

givenL1L2
2.1

Because c is constant, one has f(c(t))=f(c(0)) for every t. Since [L4] makes c a closed contour, [L3] gives cf(z)dz=cf(c(0))dz=f(c(0))(c(1)c(0))=0. Combining this with step 1.1 proves γf(z)dz=0.

step 1.1L3L4algebra
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree

Statement

Let γ:[0,1]C× be a closed rectifiable loop with γ(0)=γ(1)=1, and define

α(t)=γ(t)γ(t){zC:z=1}.

Under the standard homeomorphism [s](cos2πs,sin2πs) from R/Z to the unit circle, the loop α determines a based loop in R/Z at [0], and

n(γ,0)=deg(α).

Equivalently, the winding number of γ about 0 is exactly the integer that classifies the normalized circle loop of γ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed rectifiable loop γ:[0,1]C× with γ(0)=1.

[L1]

For a closed complex contour σ in C× and a continuous argument θ of σ about 0, one has n(σ,0)=θ(1)θ(0)2π (The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π, The winding number of a closed contour about a point off its trace).

[L2]

The map h([s])=(cos2πs,sin2πs) is a homeomorphism from R/Z to the unit circle and sends [0] to (1,0) ([t](cos2πt,sin2πt) is a homeomorphism from R/Z to the unit circle).

[L3]

The degree of a based loop in R/Z is the endpoint of its unique lift to R beginning at 0 (The degree of a based circle loop).

[L4]

The unit circle has fundamental group Z under the standard trigonometric normalization (The trigonometric loops give π1({(x,y):x2+y2=1},(1,0))Z).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Because γ(t)0 for every t, the normalized map α(t)=γ(t)/γ(t) is a continuous loop in the unit circle based at 1. Using the homeomorphism of [L2], regard the same loop as a based loop β:[0,1]R/Z at [0]. Let β~:[0,1]R be its lift with β~(0)=0, and define θ(t)=2πβ~(t).

givenL2L3construct
2.1

By the definition of h in [L2], the lift from step 1.1 supplies a continuous argument. [step 1.1, L1, L2, algebra] α(t)=cosθ(t)+isinθ(t)=eiθ(t). Hence γ(t)=γ(t)eiθ(t), so θ is a continuous argument of γ about 0. Therefore [L1] gives n(γ,0)=θ(1)θ(0)2π=β~(1).

3.1

Since β~(1) is exactly the degree of β by [L3], step 2.1 shows n(γ,0)=deg(β), which is the asserted degree of the normalized circle loop of γ. Fact [L4] records that this is the same integer that classifies the loop class in the usual π1(S1)Z convention.

step 2.1L3L4
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A plane domain with trivial fundamental group is homologically simply connected

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain. If every based loop in Ω represents the identity class in its fundamental group, then Ω is homologically simply connected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex domain Ω whose fundamental group is trivial at every basepoint.

[L1]

A based loop class is trivial exactly when the loop is path-homotopic to the constant loop at its basepoint (Based loops and the fundamental group).

[L2]

A closed rectifiable contour path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function (A closed contour path-homotopic to a constant loop has zero integral against every holomorphic function).

[L3]

For a complex domain, homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the condition that every cycle has zero integral against every holomorphic function (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).

[L4]

A complex chain is a finite integer linear combination of contours, and its integral is the corresponding finite sum of contour integrals (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles, Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).

[L6]

Continuous piecewise-C1 paths are rectifiable, and reversal changes sign while concatenation adds for complex line integrals (A continuous piecewise-C1 path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces, Complex line integrals change sign under reversal and add under concatenation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let Γ=j<rmjγj be a cycle with trace in Ω, and let f be holomorphic on Ω. Choose a basepoint z0Ω. Let E:={γj(aj):j<r, mj0}{γj(bj):j<r, mj0}. For each qE, [L5] gives a polygonal path λq in Ω from z0 to q; by [L6] each λq is a rectifiable contour.

givenL4L5L6choose
1.2

Fix j<r with mj0, and write aj=γj(aj) and bj=γj(bj). The contour δj:=λajγjλbj is a based loop at z0. By the triviality hypothesis, its loop class is the identity, so [L1] makes δj path-homotopic relative to the endpoints to the constant loop at z0. Applying [L2] and then [L6] gives 0=δjf(z)dz=λajf(z)dz+γjf(z)dzλbjf(z)dz, hence γjf(z)dz=λbjf(z)dzλajf(z)dz.

givenL1L2L6algebra
2.1

By [L4] and step 1.2, Γf(z)dz=j<rmj0mjγjf(z)dz=j<rmj0mjλbjf(z)dzj<rmj0mjλajf(z)dz. Grouping the two finite sums by endpoint qE and using the boundary formula from [L4], this becomes Γf(z)dz=qEΓ(q)λqf(z)dz=0, because Γ is a cycle. Thus Γf(z)dz=0 for every holomorphic f and every cycle Γ in Ω.

L4step 1.2algebra
3.1

The criterion in [L3] now shows that Ω is homologically simply connected.

step 2.1L3
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A connected spherical complement forces every cycle in the domain to be null-homologous

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain. If C^Ω is connected, then every cycle with trace in Ω is null-homologous in Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex domain Ω with connected spherical complement, and a cycle Γ whose trace lies in Ω.

[L1]

The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes on all sufficiently large points of the plane (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).

[L2]

A cycle with trace in an open set is null-homologous there exactly when its index vanishes at every point of the complement of that open set (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since ΓΩ, the index n(Γ,p) is defined for every pCΩ. By [L1], the function pn(Γ,p) is locally constant on CΓ, and there is R>0 with n(Γ,p)=0 whenever p>R. Thus the subset [given, L1, construct] E={}{pCΩ:n(Γ,p)=0} contains together with a punctured neighborhood of in the sphere.

givenL1construct
2.1

The set E is open in C^Ω by the local constancy from [L1], and its complement in C^Ω is open for the same reason. Since C^Ω is connected and E is nonempty by step 1.1, it follows that [step 1.1, L1, algebra] E=C^Ω. Therefore n(Γ,p)=0 for every pCΩ.

3.1

By [L2], the vanishing from step 2.1 is exactly the statement that Γ is null-homologous in Ω.

step 2.1L2
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A homologically simply connected plane domain has connected spherical complement

Statement

Let ΩC be a homologically simply connected complex domain. Then C^Ω is connected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A homologically simply connected complex domain Ω.

[L1]

A homologically simply connected complex domain is a complex domain in which every cycle with trace in the domain has index 0 at every omitted point (Homologically simply connected complex domains, A complex domain is a nonempty connected open subset of C).

[L2]

A compact subset of an open Euclidean set lies in the interior of a compact Jordan set contained in that open set, and that Jordan set may be chosen as a finite union of closed grid rectangles (A compact subset of an open Euclidean set has a compact Jordan neighborhood inside that open set).

[L3]

Chain integrals and indices are additive in the chain, reversing orientation negates the index, and a sum of cycles is a cycle (Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it).

[L4]

For a closed contour, the winding number about a point off the trace equals the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π (The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π).

[L5]

The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose, toward a contradiction, that F:=C^Ω is disconnected. Then F=AB for disjoint nonempty closed subsets A,BF. Since F, relabel so that B. Because the Riemann sphere is a metric space, the disjoint closed sets A and B have disjoint open neighbourhoods U and V in C^ with AU and BV. The inclusion V forces UC, so A is compact in C and U(CΩ)=UF=A. Hence UAΩ.

givenconstructassume-contra
2.1

Apply [L2] to the compact set AU, viewing C as R2. It gives a finite union J of closed grid rectangles with AintJJU. Give each rectangle boundary its positive orientation, sum those boundary chains, and cancel every interior edge with its opposite by [L3]. Let Γ be the remaining chain. Then Γ is a cycle, and its trace is the frontier of J, so ΓUAΩ.

step 1.1L2L3construct
3.1

Let pintJ lie on no grid line. Exactly one grid cell Q of J contains p. Along the positively oriented boundary of Q, the continuous argument of ζp increases by 2π, while along the boundary of every other grid cell it has increment 0 because p lies outside that cell. Therefore [L4] gives winding number 1 for +Q about p and 0 for every other cell boundary, and additivity from [L3] yields n(Γ,p)=1.

step 2.1L3L4algebra
4.1

Fix aA. Because AintJ, choose a disc D(a,r)intJ and then choose pD(a,r) on no grid line. The disc misses Γ, so local constancy from [L5] and step 3.1 give n(Γ,a)=n(Γ,p)=1.

step 2.1step 3.1L5choose
5.1

The point a lies in CΩ, while step 2.1 gives ΓΩ. Step 4.1 yields n(Γ,a)=10, so [L1] says that Γ is not null-homologous in Ω, contradicting the homological simple connectivity of Ω. Therefore the assumption of step 1.1 was false, and C^Ω is connected.

step 2.1step 4.1L1discharge-contradiction
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

The global Cauchy equivalences give primitives, zero periods, and holomorphic logarithms, which in turn give holomorphic roots

Remark

The genuinely new work on this page is the bridge between planar homotopy, planar complement topology, and the older homological criterion. The analytic equivalences themselves were already proved on Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain:

  • every cycle has zero period against every holomorphic function;
  • every holomorphic function has a primitive;
  • every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has a holomorphic logarithm.

The one-way root consequence is already present too: once the logarithm exists, A nonvanishing holomorphic function on such a domain has holomorphic roots of every positive order gives holomorphic roots of every positive order. The grand theorem below cites those results instead of restating their proofs.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A plane domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every harmonic function has a global conjugate

Statement

Let ΩC be a complex domain. Then the following are equivalent.

  1. Ω is homologically simply connected.
  2. Every harmonic function u:ΩR has a harmonic conjugate on Ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex domain Ω.

[L1]

On a homologically simply connected complex domain, every harmonic function has a harmonic conjugate (Harmonic conjugates exist on homologically simply connected plane domains).

[L2]

For a complex domain, homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the statement that for every point pCΩ the function z1/(zp) has a primitive on Ω (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain).

[L3]

A harmonic conjugate of a harmonic function u is a real-valued function v such that u+iv is holomorphic (Harmonic conjugates, Plane harmonic functions).

[L4]

If L and h are holomorphic with expL=h, then L=h/h (A holomorphic logarithm is a primitive of the logarithmic derivative).

[L5]

The complex exponential is entire with derivative itself, satisfies exp(z+w)=expzexpw, and compositions and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic (The complex exponential is entire and its complex derivative is itself, exp(z+w)=expzexpw, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, The chain rule for complex derivatives, Linearity, product, reciprocal, and quotient rules for complex derivatives).

[L6]

A nonconstant holomorphic function on a complex domain is open (Open mapping theorem for holomorphic functions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume condition 1. Then [L1] gives condition 2 immediately.

L1given
1.2

Assume condition 2. Fix pCΩ and define [L3, given, choose, construct] up(z)=logzp. Direct differentiation gives upx=xRepzp2,upy=yImpzp2, and then 2upx2+2upy2=0 on Ω, because pΩ. So up is harmonic on Ω. By condition 2 and [L3], choose a harmonic conjugate vp on Ω and put Fp=up+ivp, which is holomorphic on Ω.

2.1

The function [step 1.2, L5, L6, algebra] Gp(z)=exp(Fp(z))zp is holomorphic on Ω by [L5]. Its modulus is Gp(z)=exp(Fp(z))zp=eReFp(z)zp=eup(z)zp=1, so Gp(Ω) lies on the unit circle. By [L6], Gp cannot be nonconstant, hence it is constant: Gp(z)cp,cp=1. Therefore Lp:=Fplogcp satisfies exp(Lp(z))=zp on Ω.

3.1

By [L4], each Lp from step 2.1 is a primitive of 1/(zp) on Ω. Since pCΩ was arbitrary, condition 4 of [L2] holds for Ω, so [L2] gives condition 1. Together with step 1.1, this proves the equivalence.

step 2.1L2L4discharge-construct
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A homologically simply connected plane domain is either the plane or conformally equivalent to the disc

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let ΩC be a homologically simply connected complex domain. Then either Ω=C, or there is a biholomorphic map from Ω onto the unit disc D.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a homologically simply connected complex domain Ω.

[L1]

A homologically simply connected complex domain is, in particular, a complex domain (Homologically simply connected complex domains).

[L2]

Under the Axiom of Choice, every proper homologically simply connected complex domain is conformally equivalent to the unit disc (Every proper homologically simply connected plane domain is conformally equivalent to the unit disc).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], Ω is a complex domain. If Ω=C, then the first alternative holds and there is nothing more to prove.

givenL1
2.1

If ΩC, then ΩC is a proper homologically simply connected complex domain, so [L2] applies and gives a biholomorphic map ΩD. This is exactly the second alternative.

step 1.1L2
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 prove the dichotomy.

step 1.1step 2.1
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A plane domain homeomorphic to the plane or to the disc is contractible

Statement

Let ΩC be a topological space homeomorphic either to the complex plane C or to the unit disc D. Then Ω is contractible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A homeomorphism h:ΩE, where E is either C or D.

[L1]

A nonempty convex subset of Rn is contractible (Every nonempty convex subset of Rn is contractible).

[L2]

Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies (Precomposition and postcomposition by continuous maps preserve homotopies, including their relative form).

[L3]

A space is contractible when every continuous map from it is nullhomotopic (Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Both CR2 and the unit disc D are convex subsets of R2, so [L1] makes E contractible. In particular, the identity map idE is homotopic to a constant map ce for some eE.

L1given
2.1

Postcompose the homotopy from step 1.1 by h1 and precompose it by h. By [L2], this yields a homotopy from [step 1.1, L2, algebra] h1idEh=idΩ to the constant map at h1(e). Thus idΩ is nullhomotopic.

3.1

Let f:ΩY be any continuous map into any topological space Y. Postcomposing the nullhomotopy from step 2.1 by f and using [L2] again shows that [step 2.1, L2, L3] f=fidΩ is homotopic to the constant map at f(h1(e)). Hence every continuous map out of Ω is nullhomotopic, so [L3] makes Ω contractible. ∎

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

A contractible space has trivial fundamental group

Statement

Let X be a contractible topological space and let x0X. Then π1(X,x0) is the trivial group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A contractible space X and a basepoint x0X.

[L1]

A nonempty topological space is contractible exactly when its identity map is nullhomotopic (Nullhomotopic maps and contractible spaces, A nonempty space is contractible if and only if its identity map is nullhomotopic).

[L2]

Based loops at x0 are identified up to path homotopy relative to the endpoints, and the class of the constant loop cx0 is the identity of π1(X,x0) (Based loops and the fundamental group, Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], there are a point x1X and a homotopy H:X×IX from idX to the constant map cx1. Evaluating at the chosen basepoint gives a path λ(t)=H(x0,t) from x0 to x1.

givenL1construct
2.1

Let [α]π1(X,x0). Define K:I×IX by K(s,t)={H(x0,3st),0s13,H(α(3s1),t),13s23,H(x0,(33s)t),23s1. The three pieces are continuous and agree on the seams s=13,23 because α(0)=x0=α(1), so K is continuous. Also K(0,t)=x0=K(1,t) for every t, so K is a path homotopy relative to the endpoints between loops at x0. At t=0 it is cx0αcx0, and at t=1 it is λcx1λˉ. Hence [cx0αcx0]=[λcx1λˉ]. Since [cx0] is the identity by [L2], this gives [α]=[λcx1λˉ].

step 1.1L2construct
3.1

Define J:I×IX by J(s,u)={λ(3s(1u)),0s13,λ(1u),13s23,λ((33s)(1u)),23s1. The three pieces are continuous and agree on the seams, so J is continuous. Also J(0,u)=x0=J(1,u) for every u, while J(,0)=λcx1λˉ and J(,1)=cx0. Thus [λcx1λˉ]=[cx0] by [L2], and step 2.1 yields [α]=[cx0].

step 1.1step 2.1L2construct
4.1

Every loop class at x0 is therefore the identity, so π1(X,x0) is trivial.

step 3.1L2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31Open item page →

For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let ΩC be a complex domain. The following conditions are equivalent.

  1. C^Ω is connected.
  2. Ω is homologically simply connected.
  3. The fundamental group of Ω is trivial.
  4. Every holomorphic function on Ω has a primitive.
  5. For every holomorphic f on Ω and every closed rectifiable contour γ in Ω, γf(z)dz=0.
  6. Every nowhere-zero holomorphic function on Ω has a holomorphic logarithm.
  7. Every nowhere-zero holomorphic function on Ω has a holomorphic square root.
  8. Every harmonic function on Ω has a harmonic conjugate.
  9. Either Ω=C, or Ω is conformally equivalent to D.
  10. Either Ω is homeomorphic to C, or Ω is homeomorphic to D.
  11. Ω is contractible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a complex domain Ω.

[L2]

The global Cauchy page already makes homological simple connectivity equivalent to the primitive clause, the holomorphic-logarithm clause, and the omitted-point primitive clause (Equivalent characterisations of a homologically simply connected domain, The global Cauchy equivalences give primitives, zero periods, and holomorphic logarithms, which in turn give holomorphic roots).

[L3]

On a homologically simply connected domain every nowhere-zero holomorphic function has holomorphic roots of every positive order (A nonvanishing holomorphic function on such a domain has holomorphic roots of every positive order).

[L4]

Homological simple connectivity is equivalent to the global harmonic-conjugate condition (A plane domain is homologically simply connected exactly when every harmonic function has a global conjugate).

[L5]

Under the Axiom of Choice, homological simple connectivity implies the plane-or-disc alternative (A homologically simply connected plane domain is either the plane or conformally equivalent to the disc).

[L6]

A domain homeomorphic to the plane or the disc is contractible (A plane domain homeomorphic to the plane or to the disc is contractible).

[L7]

A contractible space has trivial fundamental group (A contractible space has trivial fundamental group).

[L8]

Trivial fundamental group implies homological simple connectivity for plane domains (A plane domain with trivial fundamental group is homologically simply connected).

[L9]

For a continuous function on a complex domain, having a primitive is equivalent to vanishing on every closed rectifiable contour (For a continuous function on a complex domain, endpoint independence, zero closed-contour integrals, and existence of a primitive are equivalent).

[L10]

Every complex contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm along that contour (Every contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm, unique up to a constant in 2πiZ).

[L11]

For a closed contour γ and pγ, one has n(γ,p)=12πiγdzzp, and also n(γ,p)=θ(b)θ(a)2π for every continuous argument θ of γp along γ (The winding number of a closed contour about a point off its trace, The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by 2π).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], conditions 1 and 2 are equivalent. By [L2], conditions 2, 4, and 6 are equivalent. By [L4], conditions 2 and 8 are equivalent. By [L9], conditions 4 and 5 are equivalent.

L1L2L4L9
1.2

Condition 2 implies condition 7 by [L3]. Conversely, assume condition 7. Fix pCΩ and a closed rectifiable contour γ:[a,b]Ω. Applying condition 7 repeatedly to the nowhere-zero holomorphic function zzp produces, for every m1, a nowhere-zero holomorphic function gm on Ω with gm2m=zp. By [L10], the closed contour gmγ admits a continuous logarithm λm; write θm=Imλm. Then 2mλm is a continuous logarithm of γp along γ, so [L11] gives n(γ,p)=2mθm(b)θm(a)2π. Applying [L11] again to gmγ shows that (θm(b)θm(a))/(2π) is an integer. Therefore n(γ,p)2mZ(m1). The only integer divisible by every power of 2 is 0, so n(γ,p)=0. By [L11], this is equivalent to γdzzp=0. Since p and γ were arbitrary and z1/(zp) is continuous on Ω, [L9] makes 1/(zp) admit a primitive on Ω. Thus condition 2 holds by [L2], and conditions 2 and 7 are equivalent.

L3L9L10L11algebra
1.3

Assume condition 2. By [L5], condition 9 follows. Any conformal equivalence is in particular a homeomorphism, so condition 9 implies condition 10. Then [L6] gives condition 11, [L7] gives condition 3, and [L8] returns to condition 2. Thus [L5, L6, L7, L8] 29101132.

2.1

Steps 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 connect every listed clause to condition 2, so all eleven conditions are equivalent.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

Under the grand theorem's Choice hypothesis, plane-domain simple connectivity means any grand-equivalent clause

Before this page, the track deliberately said homologically simply connected whenever only the cycle/index criterion had been proved. After For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent, and under its Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis, that caution is no longer needed for plane domains: all of the analytic, homological, homotopic, conformal, and contractibility clauses on the theorem are equivalent.

Accordingly, whenever this track invokes that theorem or a corollary derived from it, a simply connected plane domain means a complex domain satisfying any, and hence every, clause of the grand theorem under the same Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis.

CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let ΩC be a complex domain. Then Ω is simply connected if and only if C^Ω is connected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a complex domain Ω.

[L1]

Under the grand equivalence theorem, connected spherical complement, homological simple connectivity, and trivial fundamental group are equivalent conditions on Ω (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).

[L2]

Connected spherical complement implies null homology, and null homology implies connected spherical complement (A connected spherical complement forces every cycle in the domain to be null-homologous, A homologically simply connected plane domain has connected spherical complement).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If C^Ω is connected, then [L2] gives homological simple connectivity, and [L1] identifies that with simple connectivity under the current Axiom-of-Choice hypothesis.

L1L2
1.2

If Ω is simply connected, then [L1] places it under the grand-equivalent conditions, so it is homologically simply connected; [L2] then gives connected spherical complement.

L1L2
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 prove both directions.

step 1.1step 1.2
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers

Statement

For a based loop γ:[0,1]C× at 1, let r(z)=z/z and define

W([γ]):=deg(rγ).

Then W is the standard isomorphism

π1(C×,1)(Z,+).

If γ is rectifiable, then

W([γ])=n(γ,0).

Thus the analytic winding number of any rectifiable representative is the integer classifying its loop class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A based loop γ:[0,1]C× at 1.

[L1]

For a rectifiable based loop, the winding number about 0 equals the degree of its normalized circle loop (For loops in C times, the winding number about 0 equals the circle degree).

[L2]

Radial normalization is a deformation retraction of R2{0}=C× onto the unit circle (For n1, radial normalisation is a deformation retraction of Rn{0} onto Sn1).

[L3]

A deformation retract induces mutually inverse fundamental-group isomorphisms between the retract and the ambient space (A retract induces an injection on fundamental groups, and a deformation retract induces an isomorphism).

[L4]

The unit circle has fundamental group Z with the standard trigonometric generator (The trigonometric loops give π1({(x,y):x2+y2=1},(1,0))Z).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let C={zC:z=1}C× and let r:C×C be radial normalization, r(z)=z/z. Specializing [L2] to n=2 and applying [L3], the induced map r:π1(C×,1)π1(C,1) is an isomorphism. For the given loop γ, its image under r is the class of the normalized circle loop α(t)=γ(t)/γ(t).

givenL2L3
2.1

Fact [L4] identifies the class of α in π1(C,1) with the integer deg(α). Hence W([γ])=deg(rγ) is exactly the composite of the isomorphism r from step 1.1 with the standard identification π1(C,1)Z, and is therefore the standard isomorphism π1(C×,1)(Z,+). If γ is rectifiable, [L1] gives W([γ])=deg(α)=n(γ,0).

step 1.1L1L4
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-31Open item page →

Once the cited Riemann mapping theorem is granted, the new bridge implications in the grand equivalence are choice-free

The only place where the grand theorem imports a choice-bearing result is the existing Riemann mapping supplier used in clause 9. Everything else newly proved on this page is independent of that step: homotopy invariance of line integrals, the null-homotopy version of Cauchy's theorem, the complement-connectedness criterion, the harmonic-conjugate bridge, the contractibility bridge, and the winding-number/degree dictionary.

So, relative to the already-cited choice strength of the Riemann mapping page recorded in Choice strength used in the extremal proof of the Riemann mapping theorem, the new bridge implications here are choice-free.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources