How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Conformal Mapping, Branches, and the Schwarz Lemma
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Harmonic Functions and the Poisson Integral
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Isolated Singularities and Laurent Series
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Families and Montel's Theorem
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Argument Principle and Rouché's Theorem
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Residue Theorem and the Evaluation of Real Integrals
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Riemann Mapping Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These witnesses show exactly where the planar equivalence is sharp. The unit disc, the plane, slit planes, convex domains, and star-shaped domains satisfy the grand-equivalent clauses for positive reasons coming from one particular clause. The punctured plane, punctured disc, and annulus show how the failure of connectedness in the spherical complement reappears simultaneously as nontrivial winding, nontrivial loop classes, and missing primitives or logarithms.
The two deliberate traps are also recorded here. Connected complement in is too weak because omits both and in the sphere, and simple connectivity is much weaker than convexity or even star-shapedness.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The unit disc satisfies all of the grand-equivalent simple connectivity clauses
Example
The unit disc
satisfies every clause of For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit disc .
The grand theorem makes connected spherical complement, homological simple connectivity, trivial fundamental group, primitives, holomorphic logarithms, harmonic conjugates, conformal equivalence to the disc, and contractibility equivalent for plane domains (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
Verification
The complement is connected: the exterior is path-connected, and is its point at infinity.
By [L1], condition 1 from step 1.1 forces every other clause on the grand-equivalence list. So satisfies them all.
The complex plane satisfies all of the grand-equivalent simple connectivity clauses
Example
The complex plane satisfies every clause of For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The complex plane .
The grand theorem makes connected spherical complement, homological simple connectivity, trivial fundamental group, primitives, holomorphic logarithms, harmonic conjugates, conformal plane-or-disc alternative, and contractibility equivalent for plane domains (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
Verification
The spherical complement of is the singleton , hence connected.
By [L1], the connected complement from step 1.1 forces all remaining clauses. In particular, every cycle in is null-homologous, every entire function has a primitive, and is contractible.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the slit plane is simply connected
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let
Then is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the slit plane .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected).
Verification
The spherical complement of is which is connected: it is the closure in of one arc from to .
Therefore [L1] makes simply connected.
Every convex plane domain is simply connected
Example
Every convex complex domain is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A convex complex domain .
Every nonempty convex subset of is simply connected (Every nonempty convex subset of is simply connected).
Trivial fundamental group is one of the clauses equivalent to simple connectivity for plane domains (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
Verification
Regard as a convex subset of . Then [L1] gives trivial fundamental group.
By [L2], clause 3 from step 1.1 implies that is simply connected.
Every star-shaped plane domain is simply connected
Example
Every star-shaped complex domain is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A star-shaped complex domain .
Every star-shaped plane domain is homologically simply connected (Star-shaped plane domains are homologically simply connected).
Homological simple connectivity is equivalent to simple connectivity for plane domains (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
Verification
Fact [L1] makes the given domain homologically simply connected.
By [L2], step 1.1 implies that is simply connected.
A dumbbell-shaped plane domain can be simply connected without being star-shaped
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let
the union of two unit discs joined by a thin horizontal corridor. Then is simply connected, but is not star-shaped.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and the dumbbell domain displayed above.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a complex domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected).
Verification
The set is open and connected by construction. Its spherical complement is connected: outside the two discs and corridor one can move continuously around the exterior, and the slits cut out by the corridor attach to the same unbounded exterior region instead of creating a hole. Therefore [L1] makes simply connected.
The domain is not star-shaped. Set which all lie in . Let . If and , then along the segment from to the point with -coordinate has -coordinate at least , so it lies above the corridor and also outside the right unit disc because its distance to exceeds . Hence that segment leaves . If and , the same argument with gives a point at with , again outside . By symmetry, if then one of the segments from to or leaves . Thus no point of sees all of by straight segments, so is not star-shaped.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give the required witness: simply connected need not imply star-shaped.
The punctured plane has connected complement in C but disconnected spherical complement
Statement refuted
A connected complex domain with connected complement in is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured plane .
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, a plane domain is simply connected exactly when its spherical complement is connected).
The fundamental group of is , detected by winding number (Winding number identifies the fundamental group of C times with the integers).
Counterexample
The complement of in is the singleton , hence connected. But the spherical complement is which is disconnected.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, [L1] makes the disconnected spherical complement from step 1.1 enough to conclude that is not simply connected. Fact [L2] records the same failure independently as the nontrivial group .
Therefore connected complement in does not imply simple connectivity.
A round annulus is connected but not simply connected
Statement refuted
Every connected plane domain is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The annulus and the unit circle on .
In the grand theorem, connected spherical complement is equivalent to simple connectivity (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
The circle has winding number about (A circle traversed times has winding number inside and outside).
Counterexample
The annulus is open and connected, and the unit circle lies in . The spherical complement of has two pieces: the closed inner disc and the exterior region . So it is disconnected.
By [L1], step 1.1 already shows that is not simply connected. Fact [L2] gives the familiar loop witness: the unit circle still winds once around the omitted origin.
Therefore connectedness of the domain does not force simple connectivity.
The punctured disc is connected but not simply connected
Statement refuted
Every connected subdomain of the unit disc is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured disc and the circle on .
In the grand theorem, connected spherical complement is equivalent to simple connectivity (For a plane domain, the complement, homology, primitive, logarithm, conjugate, conformal, homotopy, and contractibility conditions are equivalent).
A circle around the origin has winding number about the origin (A circle traversed times has winding number inside and outside).
Counterexample
The punctured disc is open and connected, and the loop lies in it. Its spherical complement is the union of the singleton and the outer region , so it is disconnected.
By [L1], step 1.1 shows that the punctured disc is not simply connected. Fact [L2] gives the same geometric reason numerically: the loop still winds once around the omitted point .
This refutes the claim.
FALSE: a connected plane-domain complement in C already implies simple connectivity
Statement
False claim. If is a connected complex domain and is connected, then is simply connected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The punctured plane witness from The punctured plane has connected complement in C but disconnected spherical complement.
The punctured plane has connected complement in but disconnected spherical complement, and is therefore not simply connected (The punctured plane has connected complement in C but disconnected spherical complement).
Refutation
Apply [L1] to . Its complement in is the connected set , but the domain is not simply connected.
So the displayed implication fails. The missing point is exactly that plane simple connectivity depends on the complement in , not merely in .
FALSE: every simply connected plane domain is convex
Statement
False claim. Every simply connected plane domain is convex.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The slit-plane witness from Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the slit plane is simply connected.
The slit plane is simply connected (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the slit plane is simply connected).
Refutation
By [L1], the slit plane is simply connected.
It is not convex: the points and lie in the slit plane, but the straight segment between them is the vertical line segment , which contains the removed point . Thus the segment is not contained in the domain.
Therefore simple connectivity does not imply convexity.
FALSE: every simply connected plane domain is star-shaped
Statement
False claim. Every simply connected plane domain is star-shaped.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The dumbbell witness from A dumbbell-shaped plane domain can be simply connected without being star-shaped.
There is a simply connected dumbbell domain that is not star-shaped (A dumbbell-shaped plane domain can be simply connected without being star-shaped).
Refutation
Apply [L1]. It gives a plane domain that is simply connected and simultaneously not star-shaped.
Hence the universal claim is false.
Sources
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 3, §5
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §4.2
- E. Stein and R. Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 3, §6
- A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, Example 1.4
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Exercise 4.3.1
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Ch. 4, §4.3
- L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4, §4.3
- J. Lebl, Guide to Cultivating Complex Analysis, Proposition 4.3.7