How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This development treats as the Euclidean plane. The declared prerequisites provide real exponential and trigonometric series, metric completeness, finite monoid sums, absolute convergence, and compactness; Heine--Borel and the metric extreme-value theorem are used explicitly in the minimum-modulus argument.
It constructs complex arithmetic, series, exponential, logarithms, and trigonometric functions, then proves Euler's formula, the exponential fibre classification, polar form, roots of unity, and the principal-logarithm conventions. The final polynomial lemmas establish growth, global minimum modulus, and d'Alembert descent, yielding the fundamental theorem of algebra.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The complex numbers as , with their arithmetic, real embedding, and imaginary unit
Definition
Set , write , embed as , and put . Define Then . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The real numbers.
The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse
Statement
with the preceding operations is a field. For , The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex numbers as , with their arithmetic, real embedding, and imaginary unit, The reals form a totally ordered field, Field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Complex numbers and .
Proof
Coordinate expansion verifies associativity, commutativity, distributivity, and the identities and .
If , then and direct multiplication gives .
Dividing by this nonzero real proves the inverse formula and the field axioms.
Integer powers in the complex field
Definition
Fix . Apply The recursion theorem to the set , the initial value , and the function . This defines the natural powers uniquely by
Let be the embedding of The naturals embed in the integers. For an integer , that lemma gives a unique with ; define . If and , there is a unique with and ; define
The inverse exists because is a field by The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse . Thus nonnegative integer powers are defined for every , while negative integer powers are defined exactly when ; in particular and no negative power of is defined. The integer and its unique natural representative are never conflated.
The binomial theorem over the complex field
Statement
For and , write for the canonical-natural map of The canonical natural of a field. Then The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse , Integer powers in the complex field, The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , Pascal's rule , and the hockey-stick identity , The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity, Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either, The principle of mathematical induction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Complex and natural .
Proof
For both sides are the empty-sum convention .
Assume the formula at .
Multiply the formula in step 1.2 by , split the finite initial-segment sums, prove the shift from the recursive monoid-sum clauses, and group equal powers.
Pascal's rule gives the complex coefficient at every index, including the endpoints, so the formula holds at .
Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
Definition
For , set , , , and . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex numbers as , with their arithmetic, real embedding, and imaginary unit, Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are .
Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality
Statement
For complex , conjugation respects sums and products, , , and . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse , The -norms for rational , and , Each is a norm on , and the induced metrics are exactly , and of the published metric-spaces page.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Proof
Expand the coordinate definitions to prove the conjugation laws and .
Squaring both nonnegative sides proves multiplicativity of the modulus.
The Euclidean norm triangle inequality on is exactly .
The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane
Definition
For and , put
Under the identification , this is exactly the metric induced by the Euclidean norm of The -norms for rational , and . It is a metric by Each is a norm on , and the induced metrics are exactly , and of the published metric-spaces page, so the metric axioms are established rather than assumed.
Convergence in , Cauchy sequences in , and continuity of maps between subsets of mean the notions of Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: iff in , Cauchy sequence in a metric space, and Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the - form for (and the restricted metric on a subset). These uses are therefore licensed by the metric-space definition Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric.
The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts
Statement
The metric space is complete. A sequence converges to exactly when and . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane, For a sequence in converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and is complete in every norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex sequence .
Proof
The complex metric is the Euclidean metric on .
Apply componentwise convergence and completeness in the published Euclidean-space theorem.
Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence
Definition
A complex sequence is a function . Since the additive reduct of the complex field is a commutative monoid, the finite-list construction of The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity, read additively, defines its complex partial sums by
The superscript is omitted when the summands already make the codomain clear.
The complex series converges to when in the metric of The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane; then is its sum. This is the same finite sum and convergence as the vector-series definition on in Series of vectors in , absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums. The series converges absolutely when the real series of Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series converges. For a bijection , its rearrangement along is the complex series .
Let be a complex sequence and . The complex power series centered at with coefficients is
with powers from Integer powers in the complex field and the preceding complex partial sums. To define its radius without ambiguity, form the specific real power series
centered at . The radius of convergence of the complex power series is, by definition, the radius of this in A real power series about a centre, its interval of convergence, and its radius in . Thus the coefficient sequence, real variable, and center of the comparison series are all explicit.
Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum
Statement
Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and every rearrangement has the same sum. The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence, An absolutely convergent series in converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex series with convergent modulus series.
Proof
Regard its terms as vectors in ; the Euclidean norm is the complex modulus.
Apply the absolute-convergence and rearrangement theorem for finite-dimensional vector series.
Cauchy-Hadamard for complex power series, including zero and infinite radius
Statement
For , set so no th root occurs, and set Then the series converges absolutely for and diverges for ; no assertion is made on . At it converges to , including when . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence, Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum, Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as and in , For finite : iff for every one has eventually and frequently, Root test: gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, gives divergence, and decides nothing.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The coefficient sequence and a complex .
Root test: gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, gives divergence, and decides nothing applies to a real series using the defined roots .
For finite : iff for every one has eventually and frequently states that if a real is the limit superior of , then frequently for every real .
Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as and in defines as the infimum of the extended-real tail suprema .
Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum states that every absolutely convergent complex series converges.
Every convergent sequence in a metric space is Cauchy states that every convergent sequence in a metric space is Cauchy.
Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence defines the partial sums by and , and defines convergence through the complex metric.
Proof
At , every positive-index term vanishes, so the series converges to .
Suppose , put , and set . For the real modulus tail , its root family is .
If , then is finite and . Put . The eventual-upper-bound clause of [L2] gives eventually; by [L3], the limit superior of the root family is therefore at most . Hence [L1] gives convergence of the modulus tail. (When , and is impossible.)
Suppose and . Then , and [L2] gives frequently. At those arbitrarily large indices, step 1.2 gives .
Suppose and . By [L3], every tail supremum of is ; hence is not an upper bound for any tail, so frequently. Again at arbitrarily large indices.
In either divergence case, let be the complex partial sums. If converged, [L5] would make it Cauchy; but [L6] gives for arbitrarily large , contradicting the Cauchy condition with tolerance . Thus the complex series diverges.
In the case , step 2.1 says that the complex series is absolutely convergent, so it converges by [L4].
Step 1.1 covers the centre, steps 3.1 and 3.2 cover respectively and , and none of these arguments asserts anything when and . This proves all three radius cases exactly as stated.
The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums
Statement
If and converge absolutely in , and , then converges absolutely and has sum . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum, The complex plane is complete, and convergence is equivalent to convergence of real and imaginary parts, The complex numbers as , with their arithmetic, real embedding, and imaginary unit, The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity, Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either, If and both converge absolutely then their Cauchy product converges absolutely, with sum , If eventually, convergence of gives convergence of , and divergence of gives divergence of , Convergent series add and scale termwise, Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Absolutely convergent complex series and .
Proof
Define by the recursive finite complex sum. Componentwise expansion is valid because complex addition and multiplication are coordinatewise polynomial formulas.
Put . The triangle and multiplicative modulus laws give .
The real absolute Cauchy-product theorem makes converge; comparison therefore makes converge.
Expanding real and imaginary parts gives four real Cauchy products. Their sums combine by real series linearity to the two coordinates of , and componentwise convergence identifies .
The complex exponential by its power series
Definition
Let be the canonical-natural map of The canonical natural of a field, and let be the real embedding from The complex numbers as , with their arithmetic, real embedding, and imaginary unit. For every , the factorial is nonzero by The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in , so by Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing and consequently in the complex field The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse .
For , define
whenever this complex series converges. Inside a complex expression we abbreviate the embedded denominator by , so the same definition may be written without identifying a natural number with a complex number. Powers and series are those of Integer powers in the complex field and Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence. The convergence for every is discharged by The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument ↗.
The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument
Statement
For every , the series converges absolutely. The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex exponential by its power series, The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument, Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
Proof
Its modulus series is , the real exponential series at the nonnegative real .
The real infinite-radius lemma and complex absolute-convergence theorem give the result.
, and the complex exponential extends the real exponential
Statement
For all , . For real , the complex value equals the published real exponential . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex exponential by its power series, The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument, The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums, The real exponential function and the number by a power series, The binomial theorem over the complex field, for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Complex and real .
The Cauchy product of two absolutely convergent complex series converges absolutely to the product of their sums says that the product has th coefficient .
The binomial theorem over the complex field gives , where is its canonical-natural map.
The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument states that converges absolutely for every complex .
Proof
By [L4], the two exponential series converge absolutely, so [L1] makes their product the Cauchy product.
Its degree- coefficient is . By [L2], after applying the canonical-natural map into , each summand is , and [L3] turns their sum into .
The resulting series is the defining series of . When , every term is the corresponding real term in the definition of , so the two values agree.
Euler's formula: for every real
Statement
For every real , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real .
The complex exponential by its power series defines as the sum of the complex series with terms , where the factorial is embedded in the complex field.
The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument states that for every , the series converges absolutely.
If eventually, convergence of gives convergence of , and divergence of gives divergence of states that if eventually and converges, then converges.
Every absolutely convergent complex series converges, and rearrangements preserve its sum states that every absolutely convergent complex series converges.
For a sequence in converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and is complete in every norm states that a sequence in converges exactly when each coordinate sequence converges.
Convergent series add and scale termwise states that convergent real series add and scale termwise, with the corresponding sums.
Grouping: if converges and is strictly increasing with , the series of blocks converges to the same sum states that a convergent real series may be grouped into consecutive finite blocks without changing its sum.
Sine and cosine defined by their real power series defines sine and cosine by the real series and .
Integer powers in the complex field defines natural complex powers by and .
Proof
Put , and define the parity masks by for even and for odd , while for even and for odd . By [L1] and [L2], converges absolutely and has sum .
Induction from and the recursion in [L9] gives and for every . Hence , , , and .
Since and , [L3] shows that both modulus series converge. Thus and are absolutely convergent and hence converge by [L4].
By [L5], the two coordinate series of and converge. Since , applying [L6] in each coordinate gives .
Apply [L7] to each real coordinate series of , with consecutive blocks . By step 1.2 the real-coordinate blocks are and the imaginary-coordinate blocks are . Therefore [L8] identifies .
Apply the same coordinatewise grouping to . Its real-coordinate blocks are and its imaginary-coordinate blocks are , so [L8] gives .
Substitute steps 3.2 and 3.3 into step 3.1 and use step 1.1: .
, , and
Statement
For real , and . In particular . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, Euler's formula: for every real , Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality, Pythagorean and parity identities for all six trigonometric functions on their natural domains, The exponential is positive and satisfies , Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi, Pi as twice the smallest positive zero of cosine.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Reals .
Proof
Apply the addition law to and Euler's formula.
Multiplicativity of modulus, the Pythagorean identity, and positivity of give the modulus formula.
The defining quarter-turn value and give Euler's identity.
, and exactly when
Statement
and exactly when . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in , , and , The exponential function is strictly increasing, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, is a bijection from onto the real unit circle.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Proof
Cartesian form shows forces and .
Strict monotonicity gives , while the trigonometric period theorem gives .
The addition law turns equality of two exponential values into membership of in the kernel, and the converse is immediate.
Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and
Statement
Every has a unique representation with and . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus, is a bijection from onto the real unit circle, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
Proof
The point lies on the unit circle.
The unit-circle parametrization supplies an angle, and its endpoint convention converts it uniquely to .
Multiplying by proves existence; the period theorem proves uniqueness.
The complex exponential maps onto
Statement
The complex exponential maps onto . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and , , , and , The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: .
Proof
Write with .
Put .
Cartesian exponential form and give .
Complex de Moivre formula for every integer exponent
Statement
Let be the integer embedding of The integers embed in the rationals, let be the ordered-field embedding of The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field, and put . For every integer and real , The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Euler's formula: for every real , , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse , Integer powers in the complex field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer and real .
Proof
Euler's formula identifies the base with .
Repeated addition handles nonnegative powers by the exponential addition law; inverses handle negative powers.
Euler's formula at gives the displayed result.
The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every
Statement
Write for the canonical-natural map of The canonical natural of a field. If with and , its distinct roots are For , the only th root is . Thus the th roots of unity are precisely for with . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and , Complex de Moivre formula for every integer exponent, , and exactly when , Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with , The canonical natural of a field, Integer powers in the complex field.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with and .
Proof
For , construct each listed candidate from the positive real th root of ; de Moivre verifies it.
The kernel theorem shows two listed candidates coincide only when their indices are equal modulo .
Conversely polar form and the same kernel calculation force every root onto the list; the case is immediate.
For , the sum of all -th roots of unity is zero
Statement
For with , the sum of all th roots of unity is . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every , The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse , Integer powers in the complex field, The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity, Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A natural and , with as in The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every .
Proof
The roots are the distinct list , with and .
The cyclic successor map on the initial segment is a permutation; the commutative-monoid permutation rule therefore gives for .
Thus , and field cancellation gives .
Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers
Definition
For with principal polar form , , define the principal logarithm The set of all complex logarithms of is For , define the principal power and the multivalued power respectively by Thus the first is one specified complex number and the second is a set of complex numbers; neither notation silently identifies them. The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and , The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, The complex exponential by its power series, The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse .
All logarithms of are ,
Statement
For , the solutions of are exactly for . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers, , and exactly when , The complex exponential maps onto .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
Proof
The principal logarithm is one solution by its polar definition.
Equality is equivalent to by the fibre theorem.
There is no continuous logarithm on all of
Statement
There is no continuous function satisfying for every . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Complex logarithms, the principal logarithm, and principal and multivalued complex powers, , and exactly when , , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential, The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane, Euler's formula: for every real , The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions, and Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unit-circle path for .
, and exactly when states that exactly when .
Euler's formula: for every real gives , and The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine makes both real coordinate functions continuous.
A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions makes a complex-valued map continuous exactly when its two real components are continuous.
Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on takes every value between and gives every intermediate real value of a continuous real function on a closed interval.
The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane defines continuity on subsets of by its Euclidean metric.
Proof
Suppose such a continuous exists and put . By [L2], [L3], and [L5], , , and are continuous on .
The assumed identity says . Hence [L1] gives for every .
By [L3], is a continuous real-valued function; by step 2.1 it takes values in . If for some , [L4] applied to on gives a noninteger value strictly between two distinct integers, a contradiction. Thus is constant.
Euler's formula gives , so . Its imaginary quotient therefore changes by , contradicting step 3.1.
Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential
Definition
For , define The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex exponential by its power series, The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse .
The exponential formulas, real restrictions, and trigonometric-hyperbolic dictionary over
Statement
For every , The complex functions restrict to their real sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine and hyperbolic cosine series on the real axis. The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Complex sine, cosine, hyperbolic sine, and hyperbolic cosine from the complex exponential, Euler's formula: for every real , , and the complex exponential extends the real exponential.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex number .
Proof
Substitute and into the four definitions and simplify .
On real arguments, group the exponential series into even and odd terms as in Euler's formula.
Formal complex polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials
Definition
A formal complex polynomial is either the zero polynomial , or a finite coefficient list with ; we write the latter as . The list, rather than the function it induces, is the polynomial object. Define evaluation at by
where the latter is the initial-segment complex sum defined in Complex series, absolute convergence, complex power series, and radius of convergence. Thus evaluation is defined for the zero polynomial as well as every nonzero formal polynomial.
For nonzero , define and . The zero polynomial has no degree and no leading coefficient. A nonzero polynomial is monic when . Complex arithmetic and powers are those of The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse and Integer powers in the complex field.
A nonconstant complex polynomial tends to infinite modulus and attains a global minimum modulus
Statement
If is a nonconstant complex polynomial, then as , and attains a global minimum on . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Formal complex polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials, Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality, Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value, A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions, Laws of finite sums and finite products.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant polynomial with .
A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value gives a minimum for a continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space.
A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions makes a map into continuous exactly when its two components are continuous.
Proof
Put . For , [L1] gives Thus for the right side is at least , which tends to .
Writing , each coordinate projection is continuous because . The identity proves continuity of products, so induction over the finite expression makes both coordinate polynomials of continuous. Then [L4] makes and continuous.
Choose so that the lower bound of step 1.1 is when . The closed square is nonempty and compact by [L2]; outside one has . By [L3] and step 1.2, let minimize on .
Since , this minimizer satisfies . Step 2.1 makes every point outside have strictly larger modulus, so is a global minimizer.
A nonzero value of a nonconstant complex polynomial cannot be a local minimum of its modulus
Statement
If is nonconstant and , then is not minimal on any neighbourhood of . The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in Formal complex polynomials, evaluation, degree, leading coefficient, and monic polynomials, Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality, The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every , The binomial theorem over the complex field, Laws of finite sums and finite products.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant polynomial and a point with .
The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every supplies an th root of every nonzero complex number when .
Conjugation laws, , multiplicativity of modulus, and the triangle inequality gives , the triangle inequality, and .
The binomial theorem over the complex field gives the finite expansion of in complex coefficients.
Proof
By [L3], expanding gives a nonzero polynomial in (its top coefficient is the nonzero leading coefficient of ). Let be its first nonzero degree, so with . Choose by [L1] a unit complex number with . Then .
Write for the sum of the moduli of the finitely many coefficients of . For , [L2] gives . With and , choose .
Put . By step 1.1 and [L2], . Thus is arbitrarily close to and has strictly smaller modulus.
Fundamental theorem of algebra: every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root
Statement
Every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root. The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in A nonconstant complex polynomial tends to infinite modulus and attains a global minimum modulus, A nonzero value of a nonconstant complex polynomial cannot be a local minimum of its modulus.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonconstant complex polynomial .
A nonconstant complex polynomial tends to infinite modulus and attains a global minimum modulus states that attains a global minimum on .
A nonzero value of a nonconstant complex polynomial cannot be a local minimum of its modulus states that, if , then is not minimal on any neighbourhood of .
Proof
By [L1], let minimize globally.
Suppose .
By [L2], there is a point arbitrarily near with strictly smaller modulus, contradicting step 1.1.
Therefore , proving the theorem.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.