How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The binomial theorem over the complex field
Statement
For and , write for the canonical-natural map of The canonical natural of a field. Then The conventions and prerequisite facts used below are recorded in The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero has inverse , Integer powers in the complex field, The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient , Pascal's rule , and the hockey-stick identity , The product of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product () equal to the identity, Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either, The principle of mathematical induction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Complex and natural .
Proof
For both sides are the empty-sum convention .
Assume the formula at .
Multiply the formula in step 1.2 by , split the finite initial-segment sums, prove the shift from the recursive monoid-sum clauses, and group equal powers.
Pascal's rule gives the complex coefficient at every index, including the endpoints, so the formula holds at .
Depends on
- The complex numbers form a field, and every nonzero $x+iy$ has inverse $(x-iy)/(x^2+y^2)$
- Integer powers in the complex field
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- Pascal's rule $\binom{n+1}{k+1} = \binom{n}{k} + \binom{n}{k+1}$, and the hockey-stick identity $\sum_{i \le n}\binom{i}{k} = \binom{n+1}{k+1}$
- The product $g_0 g_1 \cdots g_{n-1}$ of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product ($n = 0$) equal to the identity
- Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The canonical natural $\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F$ of a field
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 84 results over 24 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I: Complex Numbers and the Complex Exponential (standard reference, not scraped)