How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
Published definitions of groups and subgroups, finite cardinality and finite sums, integer divisibility, congruence classes, and the unit group modulo a positive integer provide the algebraic and counting setting. Translating a subgroup by ambient group elements produces left and right cosets; their equality criterion, partition property, and explicit bijections with the subgroup turn the index into a precise finite count when the ambient group is finite.
Lagrange's theorem follows by summing the equal coset sizes. Its divisibility formula controls element orders, powers in finite groups, and prime-order groups; the same count gives the finite index-tower law, while index one characterizes the whole subgroup without a finiteness assumption. Applied to the published unit group modulo , the finite-group power identity yields Euler's theorem and Fermat's little theorem.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Left and right cosets and of a subgroup
Definition
Let be a group and let be a subgroup (Group and abelian group, Subgroup). For , the left coset and right coset of represented by are
The element is a representative of these cosets. The notation denotes subsets of ; it does not assert that either subset is a subgroup.
Remarks
- Because the identity belongs to , every representative belongs to its two cosets: .
- The identity cosets are . Left and right cosets can differ in a nonabelian group.
iff , and iff
Statement
Let and let . Then
and
The corresponding right-coset criterion is if and only if .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subgroup , and elements .
The left coset is , and the right coset is (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
A subgroup contains the identity and is closed under products and inverses (Subgroup).
In a group, and (In a group , and , the order of the last product being essential).
Left and right cancellation hold in every group (Cancellation in a group: or forces ; equivalently left and right translation by are bijections of , so and each have exactly one solution, Group and abelian group).
Proof
If , write with ; then . Conversely, if , then .
Suppose . If , write ; subgroup closure gives , so . Thus .
If , then , so step 1.1 gives .
Since , the same argument with interchanged gives . Hence .
Finally, is equivalent, after taking inverses elementwise, to ; by the left-coset criterion this holds exactly when .
The left cosets of a subgroup partition the group
Statement
For a subgroup , the set of distinct left cosets is a partition of : every element belongs to a left coset, every coset is nonempty, and two left cosets are either equal or disjoint.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and a subgroup .
A relation is an equivalence relation when it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
The equivalence classes of an equivalence relation on a set are nonempty, cover the set and are pairwise equal or disjoint (The equivalence classes of an equivalence relation are nonempty, cover , and are pairwise equal or disjoint; conversely every such cover arises from exactly one equivalence relation).
For , if and only if , and if and only if ( iff , and iff ).
Because , it contains the identity and is closed under inverses and products (Subgroup).
Proof
Define when . Since the given is a subgroup, , so the relation is reflexive.
If , then , so its inverse belongs to and ; thus the relation is symmetric.
If and , subgroup closure gives , so ; thus the relation is transitive.
By steps 1.1 to 1.3, is an equivalence relation. Its class at is by [L2].
The conclusion follows from [L1] applied to these equivalence classes.
Every left or right coset of is equinumerous with
Statement
If and , then the maps
and
are bijections. Thus every left and right coset of is equinumerous with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subgroup , and .
The cosets are and (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
A map is bijective when it is injective and surjective; two sets are equinumerous when a bijection between them exists (Injection, surjection, bijection, Equinumerous sets, and ).
Left and right cancellation hold in a group (Cancellation in a group: or forces ; equivalently left and right translation by are bijections of , so and each have exactly one solution).
Proof
The map , , is surjective by the definition of and injective because implies by left cancellation.
The map , , is surjective by the definition of and injective by right cancellation.
Both maps are bijections. Thus is equinumerous with each coset; moreover is a bijection, so , and are pairwise equinumerous.
Inversion induces a bijection from left cosets to right cosets
Statement
For , the rule
is a well-defined bijection from the set of left cosets of to the set of right cosets of . Its inverse sends to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and a subgroup .
For left cosets, if and only if ; for right cosets, if and only if ( iff , and iff ).
In a group, and (In a group , and , the order of the last product being essential).
A subgroup is closed under inverses (Subgroup).
A map with a two-sided inverse is a bijection (Injection, surjection, bijection, Equinumerous sets, and ).
Proof
If , then by [L1], so by subgroup inverse closure. The right-coset criterion gives , so the rule is well defined.
Define the reverse rule by . The same argument, with left and right interchanged, shows that it is well defined.
The two composites send to and to . Thus the rules are inverse bijections.
The coset set and the index of a subgroup
Definition
Let . The left coset set is
By The left cosets of a subgroup partition the group, its elements are exactly the blocks of the coset partition of . The index of in is
when is finite, with finite cardinality as in The cardinality of a finite set. If is not finite, write . Here is a symbol, not a natural number, and no arithmetic with it is defined.
The right coset set has the same finite or infinite size because Inversion induces a bijection from left cosets to right cosets gives an explicit bijection between the two coset sets. Thus the index does not depend on choosing left rather than right cosets.
In a finite group, the subgroup, every coset and the set of cosets are finite
Statement
Let be a finite group and . Then , every left and right coset of , and the coset set are finite. Moreover every coset has cardinality , and is a natural number.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a subgroup .
Every subset of a finite set is finite (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
The power set of a finite set is finite ( for finite ).
Every left or right coset of is equinumerous with (Every left or right coset of is equinumerous with ).
A bijection transports finiteness and finite cardinality (The cardinality of a finite set).
The coset set is , and its finite cardinality is the index (The coset set and the index of a subgroup, The left cosets of a subgroup partition the group).
Proof
Since and is finite, is finite by [L1].
Every coset is a subset of , so . The power set is finite by [L2], hence is finite by [L1].
Every coset is equinumerous with , so every coset is finite and has cardinality .
Therefore , and the finiteness and cardinality assertions are steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1.
Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group
Statement
Let be a finite group and . Then
Consequently, under the canonical embedding , divides .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a subgroup .
The distinct left cosets of partition (The left cosets of a subgroup partition the group).
The subgroup, every coset, and are finite; every coset has cardinality and (In a finite group, the subgroup, every coset and the set of cosets are finite, Every left or right coset of is equinumerous with , The coset set and the index of a subgroup).
For a finite partition , one has ; if every summand has the same value , then (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition, The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
The order of a finite group is the unique natural equinumerous with its underlying set, hence agrees with finite cardinality (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity, The cardinality of a finite set).
The embedding preserves multiplication, and in means for some integer (The naturals embed in the integers, Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
Proof
Apply the finite partition sum to the coset partition: .
Every summand equals , and there are summands, so the constant-sum clause gives .
Applying gives , so .
The order of every element of a finite group divides the order of the group
Statement
If is finite and , then has finite order and
in , where is the canonical embedding.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and an element .
The generated set is a subgroup of and equals the set of integer powers of (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups, , and every cyclic group is abelian).
If has finite order, then is finite and ; every element of a finite group has finite order (If then iff is an integer multiple of , the powers are distinct, and has exactly elements; if has infinite order then only for , The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Lagrange's theorem gives for every subgroup of a finite group and consequently (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group , Divisibility in : when for some integer , The naturals embed in the integers).
Proof
The element has finite order, and has order .
Apply [L2] to to obtain .
for every element of a finite group
Statement
Let be a finite group with identity . Then
for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group with identity and an element .
If , then for every integer , if and only if (If then iff is an integer multiple of , the powers are distinct, and has exactly elements; if has infinite order then only for , Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with , Exponent laws in a group: and for all , and when and commute).
Proof
By [L1], divides after both naturals are embedded in .
Applying [L2] with gives .
A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it
Statement
Let be a finite group such that the positive integer is prime. Then every has order , satisfies , and hence generates . In particular, is cyclic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group with identity , with prime, and an element with .
A prime integer satisfies , and every positive divisor of is or (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
The natural is positive, equals exactly when , and its image in divides ; the embedding is injective and preserves order (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity, The order of every element of a finite group divides the order of the group, The naturals embed in the integers).
If are finite and , then (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
If a finite set contains and , then some element of differs from : otherwise , whose cardinality is (The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
The positive integer divides the prime , so it is or . It is not because , hence by injectivity of .
The subgroup has cardinality , so .
Thus every nonidentity element generates . Since by [F1], these two integers differ; injectivity in [L1] gives , and [F2] supplies a nonidentity element. Consequently is cyclic.
For with finite,
Statement
If and is finite, then all three indices are finite and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and subgroups .
Lagrange's theorem gives whenever and is finite (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group , The coset set and the index of a subgroup, The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Every subgroup contains the identity; hence its underlying set is nonempty. Also, if , then : one has , and the identity, product, and inverse conditions for are the same inherited operations in and (Subgroup).
Every subset of a finite set is finite (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
Natural multiplication is associative, and with implies (Multiplication is associative, Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).
Proof
Since , its underlying set is a subset of the finite set , so is finite by [F2]. Also by the subgroup-transitivity derivation in [F1]. Applying [L1] to , and this gives , , and .
Substituting the first equality into the second and comparing with the third gives .
Since contains the identity, . Cancellation in therefore yields .
if and only if
Statement
For any subgroup , finite or infinite,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and a subgroup .
The coset set is . Its index is its finite cardinality when the coset set is finite and is the non-natural symbol otherwise; hence says that is finite of cardinality (The coset set and the index of a subgroup, Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
The cosets partition , and exactly when (The left cosets of a subgroup partition the group, iff , and iff ).
A finite set has cardinality exactly when it is a singleton: a bijection to has one fibre and hence one element, while the unique map from a singleton to is a bijection (The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
If , then every coset equals , so and .
Conversely, if , then is the singleton containing . Thus for every , and [L1] gives . Hence .
Since always , step 1.2 gives ; together with step 1.1 this proves the equivalence.
Euler's theorem: if and , then
Statement
Let be an integer and let . If , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive integer and an integer with .
The unit group is finite of order and has identity (The unit group and Euler's totient for ).
The class is a unit if and only if (For , is a unit if and only if ).
Every element of a finite group satisfies ( for every element of a finite group , Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with ).
Multiplication of residue classes satisfies , so natural powers satisfy ; and exactly when (Addition and multiplication on by and , The congruence class and the quotient set , Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and , Congruent integers may be added, subtracted and multiplied: representative changes preserve both arithmetic operations).
Proof
By [L1], . Applying [L2] in that group gives .
By [F2], the equality is , which is equivalent to .
Fermat's little theorem: for prime , implies , and always
Statement
Let be a prime integer and . If , then
For every integer , without the nondivisibility hypothesis,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime integer and an integer .
A prime satisfies , and implies , hence by symmetry of the gcd (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and , For a prime and any integer , is when and otherwise; so makes and coprime, is symmetric and unchanged by signs: ; moreover , , , and unless ).
Euler's theorem gives when , and for prime (Euler's theorem: if and , then , , and for every prime ).
Congruence is preserved by multiplication, and is equivalent to (Congruent integers may be added, subtracted and multiplied: representative changes preserve both arithmetic operations, Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and , Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
Integer powers satisfy for the positive exponent (Powers : natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with , Exponent laws in a group: and for all , and when and commute).
Proof
Assume first that . Then , so [L1] gives . Multiplying by and using [L2] gives .
Assume instead that . Then , so repeated multiplication gives .
The first assertion is contained in step 1.1, and the two exhaustive cases and give the unconditional congruence.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §6.1: Cosets
- UCL lecture notes, Cosets and Lagrange's theorem
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §6.2: Lagrange's Theorem
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §4.1: Cyclic Subgroups
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Lagrange's Theorem
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §6.3: Fermat's and Euler's Theorems