Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 8 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 8 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

For n≥1, the cosets of nZ are the n congruence classes modulo n

Example

Let n≥1 be an integer. In the additive group (Z,+), the subgroup nZ has left cosets

a+nZ={x∈Z:x≡a(modn)}.

There are exactly n such cosets, represented uniquely by 0,1,…,n−1, and [Z:nZ]=n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive integer n and the additive group Z.

[F1]

In additive notation, the coset represented by a is a+nZ (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup).

[L2]

Every class modulo positive n has exactly one representative r with 0≤r<n, and there are n classes (For n≥1, every class in Z/n has one representative r with 0≤r<n, so ∣Z/n∣=n; while Z/0 is in bijection with Z).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], nZ is a subgroup of (Z,+). For x∈Z, one has x∈a+nZ exactly when x=a+nk for some integer k, equivalently n∣(x−a), equivalently x≡a(modn).

L1F1F2
2.1

By [L2], every such class has a unique representative in {0,…,n−1}, and distinct representatives give distinct cosets by step 1.1.

step 1.1L2
3.1

Thus the coset set has cardinality n, so [Z:nZ]=n.

step 2.1F3∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

[G:G]=1 and, for finite G, [G:{e}]=∣G∣

Example

For every group G, [G:G]=1. If G is finite with identity e, then [G:{e}]=∣G∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G with identity e; for the second assertion, assume G is finite.

[F1]

The cosets are gH={gh:h∈H}, and the index is the cardinality of the coset set when finite (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, The coset set G/H and the index [G:H] of a subgroup).

[L2]

A subset containing e and closed under products and inverses is a subgroup; moreover e−1=e (Subgroup, In a group e−1=e, (g−1)−1=g and (gh)−1=h−1g−1, the order of the last product being essential).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For H=G, every coset gG equals G, so the coset set is {G} and [G:G]=1.

F1
1.2

The set H={e} is a subgroup: it contains e, while ee=e and e−1=e give closure under products and inverses by [L2]. Every coset is the singleton g{e}={g}; equivalently, [L1] gives ∣G∣=[G:{e}]⋅1. Hence [G:{e}]=∣G∣.

F1L1L2
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 establish the two index formulas.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The subgroup orders in Sym⁡({1,2,3}) are 1,2,3 and 6

Example

Put S3=Sym⁡({1,2,3}). Its subgroup orders are exactly 1,2,3, and 6.

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The six bijections are e,(12),(13),(23),(123),(132), so ∣S3∣=6.

F1
1.2

The subgroups {e}, ⟨(12)⟩={e,(12)}, ⟨(123)⟩={e,(123),(132)} and S3 have orders 1,2,3, and 6, respectively.

F1F2
2.1

If H≤S3, then [L1] makes ∣H∣ a positive divisor of 6, hence ∣H∣∈{1,2,3,6}.

step 1.1L1F2
3.1

Step 1.2 realizes every value allowed by step 2.1, so these are exactly the subgroup orders.

step 1.2step 2.1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A left coset that is not the corresponding right coset in Sym⁡({1,2,3})

Statement refuted

For every subgroup H≤G and every g∈G, the corresponding cosets gH and Hg are equal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group S3=Sym⁡({1,2,3}), the subgroup H={e,(12)}, and g=(123).

[F2]

The sets gH={gh:h∈H} and Hg={hg:h∈H} are the left and right cosets (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup).

[F3]

Under rightmost-first composition, if τ=(12) then ee=e, eτ=τe=τ and τ2=e; hence e−1=e, τ−1=τ, and H={e,τ} contains the identity and is closed under products and inverses, so it is a subgroup (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition, Sym⁡(X) is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever X has at least three distinct elements, Subgroup).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Direct composition gives (123)(12)=(13) and (12)(123)=(23).

F1
2.1

Therefore gH={(123),(13)} while Hg={(123),(23)}.

step 1.1F2F3
3.1

Since (13)≠(23), the left and right cosets are unequal, refuting the statement.

step 2.1∎
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

Every positive divisor of the order of a finite cyclic group occurs as the order of a subgroup

Example

Let G=⟨g⟩ be finite of order n. If the positive integer d divides n, write n=dq with q>0. Then

H=⟨gq⟩

is a subgroup of order d.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite cyclic group G=⟨g⟩ of order n, and positive integers d,q satisfying n=dq.

[L3]
[L4]

If a positive natural exponent r satisfies xr=e, then x has finite order, and its order is the least such positive exponent and is at most r; if there is no such exponent, its order is ∞ (The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Put h=gq. Then hd=gqd=gn=e, so h has finite order and ord⁡(h)≤d.

givenL1L2L3L4
1.2

If hk=e for a positive natural k, then gqk=e, so [L1] gives n∣qk. Thus qk=nm=qdm for some integer m, and cancellation by the positive integer q gives k=dm.

L1L2L3
2.1

No positive k<d satisfies hk=e: step 1.2 would give k=dm; positivity forces m≥1, hence k≥d, a contradiction. Together with step 1.1, this gives ord⁡(h)=d.

step 1.1step 1.2L3
3.1

Therefore H=⟨h⟩ is a subgroup with ∣H∣=ord⁡(h)=d.

step 2.1F1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-03 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

2Z has index 2 in Z and is nevertheless equinumerous with Z

Statement refuted

If a proper subgroup H<G has finite index, then H cannot be equinumerous with G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The additive group Z and its subgroup 2Z.

[F2]

The index is the number of cosets, additive cosets have the form a+2Z, and at modulus 2 every congruence class has exactly one representative r with 0≤r<2, hence representative 0 or 1 (The coset set G/H and the index [G:H] of a subgroup, Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, For n≥1, every class in Z/n has one representative r with 0≤r<n, so ∣Z/n∣=n; while Z/0 is in bijection with Z).

[F3]

Two sets are equinumerous when a bijection between them exists (Equinumerous sets, A≈B and A⪯B, Injection, surjection, bijection).

[F4]

Multiplication by a nonzero integer can be cancelled: if xz=yz and z≠0, then x=y (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The two cosets are 2Z and 1+2Z. Indeed [F2] writes every integer as a=2q+r with r∈{0,1}; then a+2Z=r+2Z, since a+2k=r+2(q+k) and, conversely, r+2t=a+2(t−q). Thus every coset is one of the displayed two, and they are distinct because one contains 0 while the other does not. Hence [Z:2Z]=2.

F1F2
1.2

The map f:Z→2Z given by f(k)=2k is surjective by the definition of 2Z and injective because 2k=2ℓ implies k=ℓ by cancellation at the nonzero factor 2. Hence it is a bijection.

F3F4construct
2.1

Thus the proper subgroup 2Z has finite index and is equinumerous with Z, refuting the statement.

step 1.1step 1.2F1∎
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The product set HK of two subgroups need not be a subgroup

Statement refuted

For any two subgroups H,K≤G, the product set HK={hk:h∈H, k∈K} is a subgroup of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group S3=Sym⁡({1,2,3}), and the subgroups H={e,(12)} and K={e,(23)}.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The six elements of S3 are e,(12),(13),(23),(123),(132), so ∣S3∣=6.

F1
1.2

Direct multiplication gives HK={e,(12),(23),(12)(23)}={e,(12),(23),(123)}, a set of four distinct elements.

F1
2.1

If HK were a subgroup, [L1] would force ι(4)∣ι(6) in Z, that is 4∣6, which is false. Hence HK is not a subgroup.

step 1.1step 1.2L1∎
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Every left coset of a subgroup is itself a subgroup

Statement

Every left coset gH of every subgroup H≤G is a subgroup of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The group S3, the subgroup H={e,(12)} and the element g=(123) from A left coset that is not the corresponding right coset in Sym⁡({1,2,3}).

[F2]

Every subgroup contains the identity element (Subgroup).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Neither (123) nor (13) is the identity, so e∉gH.

F1
2.1

By [F2], the set gH cannot be a subgroup. This single coset refutes the statement.

step 1.1F2∎

Sources