How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The product set of two subgroups need not be a subgroup
Statement refuted
For any two subgroups , the product set is a subgroup of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group , and the subgroups and .
is a group under rightmost-first composition, and are subgroups because each transposition squares to (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition, is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements, Subgroup).
If is a subgroup of a finite group , then under the canonical embedding one has (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group , The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity).
Counterexample
The six elements of are , so .
Direct multiplication gives , a set of four distinct elements.
If were a subgroup, [L1] would force in , that is , which is false. Hence is not a subgroup.
Depends on
- Lagrange's theorem: $|G|=[G:H]|H|$ for every subgroup $H$ of a finite group $G$
- Subgroup
- The symmetric group $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$: the bijections of a set $X$ under composition
- $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$ is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever $X$ has at least three distinct elements
- The order $|G|$ of a finite group and the order $\operatorname{ord}(g)$ of an element, with $\operatorname{ord}(g) = \infty$ when no positive power of $g$ is the identity
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 75 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Cosets and Lagrange's Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, §6.1: Cosets (standard reference, not scraped)