Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cyclic Groups and Direct Products: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The Klein four-group as the direct product of two groups of order 2

Example

The Klein four-group is

V4=(Z/2,+)×(Z/2,+).

It has the four elements (0,0),(1,0),(0,1),(1,1). Every nonidentity element has order 2, so V4 is not cyclic.

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Dividing any integer a by 2 gives a=2q+r with 0≤r<2, so its class is either [0] or [1]. These are distinct because 1−0 is not a multiple of 2, and [1]+[1]=[0]. Hence the four displayed pairs are exactly the elements of V4.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

For each nonzero pair (a,b) in that list, (a,b)+(a,b)=(a+a,b+b)=(0,0); it is not the identity, so its order is 2.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

If V4 were cyclic, a generator could not be the identity, so step 2.1 would give it order 2. Then [L3] says that its cyclic subgroup has two elements, contradicting step 1.1. Thus V4 is not cyclic.

step 1.1step 2.1L3∎
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The cyclic group Z/4 is not isomorphic to Z/2×Z/2

Counterexample

The groups Z/4 and Z/2×Z/2 both have four elements, but they are not isomorphic: the first has an element of order 4, whereas every nonidentity element of the second has order 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The additive quotient groups Z/4 and Z/2.

[L1]

The residue classes modulo n form the quotient group of the additive integers (For every n∈N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ).

[L2]

In a direct product, a pair with finite component orders m,n has order the unique positive natural whose canonical integer image is lcm⁡(ι(m),ι(n)) (If g and h have finite orders m and n, then ι(ord⁡(g,h))=lcm⁡(ι(m),ι(n)) in G×H).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

The class [1] in Z/4 has order 4, while the nonzero class in Z/2 has order 2.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

By [L2], each nonidentity pair has component orders 1,2 or 2,2. Their least common multiple is 2, so every nonidentity pair has order 2.

step 1.1L2given
3.1

A group isomorphism preserves the least positive exponent at which a power is the identity, by [L3]; it therefore cannot send the order-4 element of step 1.1 to any element of the target.

step 1.1step 2.1L3
4.1

Hence Z/4 and Z/2×Z/2 are not isomorphic.

step 3.1∎

Sources