How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a group with identity , coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections
Statement
For groups and , the componentwise operation of The external direct product with componentwise multiplication makes a group. Its identity is , and
Moreover the coordinate maps and are group homomorphisms.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Groups with identities .
has the componentwise operation (The external direct product with componentwise multiplication).
A group operation is associative, has a two-sided identity, and gives every element a two-sided inverse (Group and abelian group).
A map between groups is a group homomorphism exactly when it preserves products (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).
Proof
For , associativity in each factor gives ; thus the componentwise operation is associative.
For every , ; thus is a two-sided identity.
For every , ; so is its inverse.
Steps 1.1–1.3 verify the group axioms for .
For pairs , ; the same coordinatewise calculation holds for , so both projections are homomorphisms from the group in step 2.1.
The stated identity, inverse formula, and coordinate homomorphisms follow.
Depends on
Used by
- The central product G∘_α H of two groups along an isomorphism of central subgroups Definition
- ⟨ a,b∣ a², b², aba⁻¹b⁻¹⟩≅(ℤ/2)×(ℤ/2) Example
- ⟨ a,b∣ aba⁻¹b⁻¹⟩≅(ℤ,+)×(ℤ,+) Example
- The canonical surjection from a free product to the direct product of its factors Example
- The finite Heisenberg group is the unique Sylow p-subgroup of its coordinate upper-triangular group Example
- The Klein four-group as the direct product of two groups of order 2 Example
- The split extension C₂ × C₂ of C₂ by C₂ is direct Example
- The torsion-free reflection of the integers direct sum a finite cyclic group Example
- Two filtered abelian groups with the same associated graded Example
- FALSE: every finite group is a direct product of cyclic prime-power groups False statement
- The composition factors determine a finite group up to isomorphism False statement
- A direct product of two finite cyclic groups is cyclic if and only if their orders are coprime Lemma
- The identified subgroup used to form a central product is central, hence normal Lemma
- For finite groups G and H, |G× H|=|G| |H| Proposition
- Φ(P× Q)=Φ(P)×Φ(Q) for finite p-groups Proposition
- Extensions and finite direct products of solvable groups are solvable Theorem
- For prime p, |Aut((ℤ/p)×(ℤ/p))|=(p²-1)(p²-p) Theorem
- If g and h have finite orders m and n, then ι(ord(g,h))=lcm(ι(m),ι(n)) in G× H Theorem
- Internal direct products are external direct products, equivalently every element has a unique factorisation Theorem
- Subgroups, quotients, and finite direct products of nilpotent groups are nilpotent Theorem
- π₁(X× Y,(x₀,y₀))≅π₁(X,x₀)×π₁(Y,y₀) Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The external direct product G× H with componentwise multiplication.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sharifi, Abstract Algebra, direct products (standard reference, not scraped)