Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

G×H is a group with identity (eG,eH), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections

Statement

For groups G and H, the componentwise operation of The external direct product G×H with componentwise multiplication makes G×H a group. Its identity is (eG,eH), and

(g,h)−1=(g−1,h−1).

Moreover the coordinate maps πG(g,h)=g and πH(g,h)=h are group homomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Groups G,H with identities eG,eH.

[L1]

G×H has the componentwise operation (g,h)(g′,h′)=(gg′,hh′) (The external direct product G×H with componentwise multiplication).

[L2]

A group operation is associative, has a two-sided identity, and gives every element a two-sided inverse (Group and abelian group).

[L3]

A map between groups is a group homomorphism exactly when it preserves products (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For (g,h),(g′,h′),(g′′,h′′)∈G×H, associativity in each factor gives ((g,h)(g′,h′))(g′′,h′′)=(gg′g′′,hh′h′′)=(g,h)((g′,h′)(g′′,h′′)); thus the componentwise operation is associative.

L1L2givenalgebra
1.2

For every (g,h)∈G×H, (eG,eH)(g,h)=(g,h)=(g,h)(eG,eH); thus (eG,eH) is a two-sided identity.

L1L2givenalgebra
1.3

For every (g,h)∈G×H, (g,h)(g−1,h−1)=(eG,eH)=(g−1,h−1)(g,h); so (g−1,h−1) is its inverse.

L1L2givenalgebra
2.1

Steps 1.1–1.3 verify the group axioms for G×H.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L2
3.1

For pairs (g,h),(g′,h′), πG((g,h)(g′,h′))=gg′=πG(g,h)πG(g′,h′); the same coordinatewise calculation holds for πH, so both projections are homomorphisms from the group in step 2.1.

step 2.1L1L3givenalgebra
4.1

The stated identity, inverse formula, and coordinate homomorphisms follow.

step 2.1step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The external direct product G× H with componentwise multiplication.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources