Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

5 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 5 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cyclic Groups and Direct Products

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The earlier development of groups, subgroups, element orders, and homomorphisms provides the language used here. Cyclic subgroups are already available, while least common multiples and the integer classification of finite cyclic groups support the order calculations and structural identifications.

This page defines the external direct product and proves that it is a group. It computes the size of a finite product and the order of a pair, classifies cyclic groups as either infinite cyclic or finite cyclic, and proves that every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The external direct product G×HG\times H with componentwise multiplication

Definition

Let GG and HH be groups. Their external direct product has underlying set

G×H:={(g,h):gG, hH}G\times H:=\{(g,h):g\in G,\ h\in H\}

and componentwise operation

(g,h)(g,h):=(gg,hh).(g,h)(g',h') := (gg',hh').

The fact that this operation makes G×HG\times H a group, with the indicated identity and inverses, is proved in G×HG\times H is a group with identity (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections . Until that result is used, this definition introduces only the set and its componentwise binary operation.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

G×HG\times H is a group with identity (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H), coordinatewise inverses, and homomorphic coordinate projections

Statement

For groups GG and HH, the componentwise operation of The external direct product G×HG\times H with componentwise multiplication makes G×HG\times H a group. Its identity is (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H), and

(g,h)1=(g1,h1).(g,h)^{-1}=(g^{-1},h^{-1}).

Moreover the coordinate maps πG(g,h)=g\pi_G(g,h)=g and πH(g,h)=h\pi_H(g,h)=h are group homomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Groups G,HG,H with identities eG,eHe_G,e_H.

[L1]

G×HG\times H has the componentwise operation (g,h)(g,h)=(gg,hh)(g,h)(g',h')=(gg',hh') (The external direct product G×HG\times H with componentwise multiplication).

[L2]

A group operation is associative, has a two-sided identity, and gives every element a two-sided inverse (Group and abelian group).

[L3]

A map between groups is a group homomorphism exactly when it preserves products (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For (g,h),(g,h),(g,h)G×H(g,h),(g',h'),(g'',h'')\in G\times H, associativity in each factor gives ((g,h)(g,h))(g,h)=(ggg,hhh)=(g,h)((g,h)(g,h))((g,h)(g',h'))(g'',h'')=(gg'g'',hh'h'')=(g,h)((g',h')(g'',h'')); thus the componentwise operation is associative.

L1L2givenalgebra
1.2

For every (g,h)G×H(g,h)\in G\times H, (eG,eH)(g,h)=(g,h)=(g,h)(eG,eH)(e_G,e_H)(g,h)=(g,h)=(g,h)(e_G,e_H); thus (eG,eH)(e_G,e_H) is a two-sided identity.

L1L2givenalgebra
1.3

For every (g,h)G×H(g,h)\in G\times H, (g,h)(g1,h1)=(eG,eH)=(g1,h1)(g,h)(g,h)(g^{-1},h^{-1})=(e_G,e_H)=(g^{-1},h^{-1})(g,h); so (g1,h1)(g^{-1},h^{-1}) is its inverse.

L1L2givenalgebra
2.1

Steps 1.1–1.3 verify the group axioms for G×HG\times H.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L2
3.1

For pairs (g,h),(g,h)(g,h),(g',h'), πG((g,h)(g,h))=gg=πG(g,h)πG(g,h)\pi_G((g,h)(g',h'))=gg'=\pi_G(g,h)\pi_G(g',h'); the same coordinatewise calculation holds for πH\pi_H, so both projections are homomorphisms from the group in step 2.1.

step 2.1L1L3givenalgebra
4.1

The stated identity, inverse formula, and coordinate homomorphisms follow.

step 2.1step 3.1
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

For finite groups GG and HH, G×H=GH|G\times H|=|G|\,|H|

Statement

If GG and HH are finite groups, then their external direct product is finite and has order G×H=GH|G\times H|=|G|\,|H|.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The carrier of the direct-product group is the Cartesian product of the finite carriers GG and HH.

L1given
2.1

By the finite product rule, G×HG\times H is finite and G×Hset=GsetHset|G\times H|_{\mathrm{set}}=|G|_{\mathrm{set}}|H|_{\mathrm{set}}.

step 1.1L3
3.1

Reading these three cardinalities as group orders gives G×H=GH|G\times H|=|G|\,|H|.

step 2.1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

If gg and hh have finite orders mm and nn, then ι(ord(g,h))=lcm(ι(m),ι(n))\iota(\operatorname{ord}(g,h))=\operatorname{lcm}(\iota(m),\iota(n)) in G×HG\times H

Statement

Let ι:NZ\iota:\mathbb N\to\mathbb Z be the canonical embedding. If gGg\in G and hHh\in H have finite orders m,n1m,n\ge1, then in the external direct product

ι(ord(g,h))=lcm(ι(m),ι(n)).\iota(\operatorname{ord}(g,h))=\operatorname{lcm}(\iota(m),\iota(n)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Groups G,HG,H, elements gG,hHg\in G,h\in H, and positive natural numbers m,nm,n with ord(g)=m\operatorname{ord}(g)=m and ord(h)=n\operatorname{ord}(h)=n.

[L3]

For positive m,nm,n, the integer L=lcm(ι(m),ι(n))L=\operatorname{lcm}(\iota(m),\iota(n)) is a positive common multiple of ι(m)\iota(m) and ι(n)\iota(n), and it divides every common multiple. Thus L=ι()L=\iota(\ell) for a unique natural 1\ell\ge1 (Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm(a,b)\operatorname{lcm}(a,b), taken to be 00 when a=0a = 0 or b=0b = 0, Every common multiple of aa and bb is a multiple of lcm(a,b)\operatorname{lcm}(a,b), and gcd(a,b)lcm(a,b)=ab\gcd(a,b) \cdot \operatorname{lcm}(a,b) = |ab|, The naturals embed in the integers).

[L4]

Induction is valid for natural-number powers (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every natural kk, (g,h)k=(gk,hk)(g,h)^k=(g^k,h^k): it holds at k=0k=0, and the successor step follows by componentwise multiplication.

L1L4given
2.1

Let \ell be the natural from [L3]. Since ι(m)ι()\iota(m)\mid\iota(\ell) and ι(n)ι()\iota(n)\mid\iota(\ell), [L2] and step 1.1 give (g,h)=(eG,eH)(g,h)^\ell=(e_G,e_H).

step 1.1L2L3given
2.2

If (g,h)k=(eG,eH)(g,h)^k=(e_G,e_H) for a positive natural kk, then step 1.1 gives gk=eGg^k=e_G and hk=eHh^k=e_H. Hence ι(m)ι(k)\iota(m)\mid\iota(k) and ι(n)ι(k)\iota(n)\mid\iota(k).

step 1.1L2given
3.1

By [L3], the two divisibilities of step 2.2 imply ι()ι(k)\iota(\ell)\mid\iota(k). As ,k1\ell,k\ge1, this forces k\ell\le k: an integer quotient qq with ι(k)=qι()\iota(k)=q\iota(\ell) is positive and hence at least 11. Thus \ell is the least positive exponent sending (g,h)(g,h) to the identity.

step 2.1step 2.2L3algebra
4.1

The definition of element order gives ord(g,h)=\operatorname{ord}(g,h)=\ell. Applying ι\iota and using [L3] gives the displayed equality.

step 3.1L2L3
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

Every cyclic group is isomorphic to (Z,+)(\mathbb Z,+) or to (Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z/n,+) for its finite order n1n\ge1

Statement

If G=gG=\langle g\rangle is cyclic, then exactly one of the following applies:

  • if gg has infinite order, G(Z,+)G\cong(\mathbb Z,+);
  • if gg has finite order nn, necessarily n1n\ge1, then G(Z/n,+)G\cong(\mathbb Z/n,+).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group GG and an element gGg\in G with G=gG=\langle g\rangle.

[L4]

The additive quotient group (Z,+)/nZ(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z is the group (Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z/n,+) (For every nNn\in\mathbb N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+)(\mathbb Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ(\mathbb Z,+)/n\mathbb Z).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose first that gg has infinite order. The map ϕ:ZG\phi:\mathbb Z\to G, rgrr\mapsto g^r, is a homomorphism by the power law in [L3]. If gr=gsg^r=g^s, then grs=gr(gs)1=eg^{r-s}=g^r(g^s)^{-1}=e by [L3], so [L2] forces r=sr=s; it is surjective by [L1].

L1L2L3given
1.2

Suppose instead that gg has finite order nn. Then n1n\ge1 by the definition of element order, and [r]gr[r]\mapsto g^r defines a map ϕˉ:Z/nG\bar\phi:\mathbb Z/n\to G because [r]=[s][r]=[s] means n(rs)n\mid(r-s), so [L2] gives grs=eg^{r-s}=e and [L3] gives gr=grsgs=gsg^r=g^{r-s}g^s=g^s.

L2L3L4given
2.1

Hence in the infinite-order case ϕ\phi is an isomorphism ZG\mathbb Z\cong G.

step 1.1L3
2.2

The map ϕˉ\bar\phi is a homomorphism by the power law, is injective because gr=gsg^r=g^s gives grs=gr(gs)1=eg^{r-s}=g^r(g^s)^{-1}=e by [L3] and then [L2] gives n(rs)n\mid(r-s), and is surjective by [L1].

step 1.2L1L2L3
3.1

Thus ϕˉ\bar\phi is an isomorphism (Z/n,+)G(\mathbb Z/n,+)\cong G in the finite-order case.

step 2.2L3L4
4.1

Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give the asserted classification according as the order of gg is infinite or finite.

step 2.1step 3.1
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic; the least positive exponent in a nontrivial subgroup supplies a generator

Statement

Every subgroup HH of a cyclic group G=gG=\langle g\rangle is cyclic. If H{e}H\ne\{e\}, then the least positive integer dd for which gdHg^d\in H satisfies H=gdH=\langle g^d\rangle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cyclic group G=gG=\langle g\rangle and a subgroup HGH\le G.

[L1]

A subgroup contains the identity and is closed under products and inverses (Subgroup).

[L3]
[L4]

A nonempty subset of N\mathbb N has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[L5]

For d>0d>0 and kZk\in\mathbb Z, there are q,rZq,r\in\mathbb Z with k=qd+rk=qd+r and 0r<d0\le r<d (Division with remainder in Z\mathbb{Z}: for aZa \in \mathbb{Z} and b>0b > 0 there are unique q,rZq, r \in \mathbb{Z} with a=qb+ra = qb + r and 0r<b0 \le r < b).

[L6]

A nonzero integer is positive or has positive negative (The integers form a totally ordered ring).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If H={e}H=\{e\}, then H=eH=\langle e\rangle and is cyclic. Assume henceforth that H{e}H\ne\{e\}.

L1L2given
1.2

The set S:={nN:n1 and gnH}S:=\{n\in\mathbb N:n\ge1\text{ and }g^n\in H\} is nonempty: choose hH{e}h\in H\setminus\{e\} and write h=gkh=g^k by [L2]. Since g0=eg^0=e, k0k\ne0; by [L6], either k>0k>0 or k>0-k>0. In the first case use hh, and in the second use h1=gkh^{-1}=g^{-k}.

L1L2L3L6given
2.1

Let dd be the least element of SS, supplied by [L4]. Then gdHg^d\in H, so gdH\langle g^d\rangle\subseteq H by the smallest-subgroup property in [L2].

step 1.2L2L4
3.1

For hHh\in H, write h=gkh=g^k by [L2] and write k=qd+rk=qd+r with 0r<d0\le r<d by [L5]. Then gr=h(gd)qHg^r=h(g^d)^{-q}\in H.

step 2.1L1L2L3L5
4.1

If r>0r>0 in step 3.1, then rSr\in S contradicts the minimality of dd; hence r=0r=0, so h=(gd)qgdh=(g^d)^q\in\langle g^d\rangle.

step 3.1L2L4
5.1

Thus HgdH\subseteq\langle g^d\rangle in the nontrivial case, and step 2.1 gives equality; together with step 1.1 this proves every subgroup of GG is cyclic.

step 1.1step 2.1step 4.1

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources

Standard references

Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.