How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every common multiple of and is a multiple of , and
Statement
Let , and write (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ) and (Common multiple, and the least common multiple , taken to be when or ). Then:
- every common multiple of and is a multiple of , that is, whenever and ;
- .
Both hold for every pair, including the pairs with or , where the two sides of clause 2 are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers and , and .
is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, , , , multiplication distributes over addition, and every has an additive inverse, with (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).
The order on is total, antisymmetric and transitive; means together with (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).
For both nonzero, is the least positive common multiple of and ; if or then the only common multiple is and (Common multiple, and the least common multiple , taken to be when or ).
when , , and is a common divisor of and (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
If then and for unique integers , , and (If is nonzero then and are coprime).
If and then (If and then ; and if , and then ).
Divisibility is reflexive and transitive; implies , and ; and means for some (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on , and is linear: if and then for all integers ; also implies , and , Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
; exactly when ; when ; ; and is or (The absolute value of an integer, Absolute value in : ; exactly when ; ; ; ; and exactly when ).
A product of two nonzero integers is nonzero, and with gives (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).
Proof
Case or . Then and the only common multiple of and is , so clause 1 reads , which holds. And , so : clause 2 holds.
Case and . Then , so ; in particular and , so . Fix with , and .
In the case of step 1.2 put . Both and are nonzero, since and ; hence , so and , and .
is a common multiple of and . Indeed and , so and ; and equals or , since is or . So and .
: and with , so and the product of two positives is positive.
Every common multiple of and is a multiple of . Write . From , that is , we get for some , and cancelling gives , so . Since , [L7] gives , say ; then , so and hence , because is or .
. By steps 3.1 and 3.2, is a positive common multiple. If is any positive common multiple, then by step 3.3 and , so by [L9], that is since both are positive. So is the least positive common multiple, which is .
Clause 1 in this case now follows from step 3.3, since .
Clause 2 in this case: , using and multiplicativity of the absolute value throughout.
The two cases of steps 1.1 and 1.2 are exhaustive, so clauses 1 and 2 hold for every pair .
Remarks
-
Clause 1 is the clause later pages use. "Least positive common multiple" is how was defined, but the useful property is that it divides every common multiple, which is what identifies with in and ; equivalently, in the subgroup generated by is and .
-
The absolute value in clause 2 is not decorative. The unsigned form is false, and refutes it: the companion page records this as FALSE: For all integers and , ↗.
-
Where coprimality enters. The only substantial step is step 3.3, which proves that every common multiple is a multiple of ; what it uses is that and are coprime (If is nonzero then and are coprime) together with the coprime divisibility lemma (If and then ; and if , and then ). Without those the argument gives only that is a common multiple, not the least one.
Depends on
- Common multiple, and the least common multiple $\operatorname{lcm}(a,b)$, taken to be $0$ when $a = 0$ or $b = 0$
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- $\gcd$ is symmetric and unchanged by signs: $\gcd(a,b) = \gcd(b,a) = \gcd(|a|,|b|)$; moreover $\gcd(a,0) = |a|$, $\gcd(a,1) = 1$, $\gcd(a,a) = |a|$, and $\gcd(a,b) \ge 1$ unless $a = b = 0$
- If $d = \gcd(a,b)$ is nonzero then $a/d$ and $b/d$ are coprime
- If $\gcd(a,b) = 1$ and $a \mid bc$ then $a \mid c$; and if $a \mid c$, $b \mid c$ and $\gcd(a,b) = 1$ then $ab \mid c$
- Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on $\mathbb{Z}$, and is linear: if $d \mid a$ and $d \mid b$ then $d \mid ax + by$ for all integers $x, y$; also $d \mid a$ implies $d \mid ac$, $-d \mid a$ and $d \mid -a$
- If $d \mid a$ and $a \ne 0$ then $d \ne 0$ and $|d| \le |a|$; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by $|a|$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation
- The integers form a commutative ring
- Arithmetic on the integers
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
- Order on the integers
Used by
- 12ℤ + 18ℤ = 6ℤ and 12ℤ ∩ 18ℤ = 36ℤ, the arithmetic of gcd and lcm read off the subgroups of (ℤ,+) Example
- 360 = 2³ · 3² · 5 and 84 = 2² · 3 · 7, with gcd(360,84) = 12 and lcm(360,84) = 2520 read off the exponents Example
- FALSE: For all integers a and b, gcd(a,b) · lcm(a,b) = ab False statement
- aℤ + bℤ = gcd(a,b) ℤ and aℤ ∩ bℤ = lcm(a,b) ℤ; equivalently, in (ℤ,+) the subgroup generated by {a,b} is ⟨ gcd(a,b) ⟩ and ⟨ a ⟩ ∩ ⟨ b ⟩ = ⟨ lcm(a,b) ⟩ Theorem
- For positive integers a and b and every prime p: vₚ(gcd(a,b)) = min{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)} and vₚ(lcm(a,b)) = max{vₚ(a), vₚ(b)}; so the exponent-wise greatest common divisor is the gcd of the divisibility page and not a second notion Theorem
- If g and h have finite orders m and n, then ι(ord(g,h))=lcm(ι(m),ι(n)) in G× H Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 64 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Least common multiple (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Greatest common divisor (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)