Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every common multiple of a and b is a multiple of lcm⁡(a,b), and gcd⁡(a,b)⋅lcm⁡(a,b)=∣ab∣

Statement

Let a,b∈Z, and write d=gcd⁡(a,b) (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0) and ℓ=lcm⁡(a,b) (Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm⁡(a,b), taken to be 0 when a=0 or b=0). Then:

  1. every common multiple of a and b is a multiple of ℓ, that is, ℓ∣m whenever a∣m and b∣m;
  2. d⋅ℓ=∣ab∣.

Both hold for every pair, including the pairs with a=0 or b=0, where the two sides of clause 2 are 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Integers a and b, d:=gcd⁡(a,b) and ℓ:=lcm⁡(a,b).

[L1]

Z is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, x⋅1=x, x⋅0=0, x⋅(−1)=−x, multiplication distributes over addition, and every x has an additive inverse, with −(−x)=x (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).

[L2]

The order on Z is total, antisymmetric and transitive; x<y means x≤y together with x≠y (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).

[L3]

For a,b both nonzero, ℓ is the least positive common multiple of a and b; if a=0 or b=0 then the only common multiple is 0 and ℓ=0 (Common multiple, and the least common multiple lcm⁡(a,b), taken to be 0 when a=0 or b=0).

[L4]

d≥1 when (a,b)≠(0,0), gcd⁡(0,0)=0, and d is a common divisor of a and b (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor gcd⁡(a,b), with the convention gcd⁡(0,0):=0).

[L5]

If d≠0 then a=da′ and b=db′ for unique integers a′=a/d, b′=b/d, and gcd⁡(a′,b′)=1 (If d=gcd⁡(a,b) is nonzero then a/d and b/d are coprime).

[L11]

A product of two nonzero integers is nonzero, and xz=yz with z≠0 gives x=y (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Case a=0 or b=0. Then ℓ=0 and the only common multiple of a and b is 0, so clause 1 reads 0∣0, which holds. And ab=0, so ∣ab∣=0=d⋅0=dℓ: clause 2 holds.

assume-case degenerateL1L3L8L10
1.2

Case a≠0 and b≠0. Then (a,b)≠(0,0), so d≥1; in particular d≠0 and d≥0, so ∣d∣=d. Fix a′,b′ with a=da′, b=db′ and gcd⁡(a′,b′)=1.

assume-case genericL2L4L5L10
2.1

In the case of step 1.2 put M:=d ∣a′b′∣. Both a′ and b′ are nonzero, since a=da′≠0 and b=db′≠0; hence a′b′≠0, so ∣a′b′∣≥0 and ∣a′b′∣≠0, and M≠0.

step 1.2L1L10L11
3.1

M is a common multiple of a and b. Indeed da′b′=(da′)b′=ab′ and da′b′=(db′)a′=ba′, so a∣da′b′ and b∣da′b′; and M=d∣a′b′∣ equals da′b′ or −(da′b′), since ∣a′b′∣ is a′b′ or −(a′b′). So a∣M and b∣M.

step 1.2step 2.1L1L8L10
3.2

M>0: d≥1>0 and ∣a′b′∣≥0 with ∣a′b′∣≠0, so ∣a′b′∣>0 and the product of two positives is positive.

step 1.2step 2.1L2L10
3.3

Every common multiple m of a and b is a multiple of M. Write m=as=da′s. From b∣m, that is db′∣da′s, we get da′s=db′t for some t, and cancelling d≠0 gives a′s=b′t, so b′∣a′s. Since gcd⁡(b′,a′)=gcd⁡(a′,b′)=1, [L7] gives b′∣s, say s=b′u; then m=da′b′u, so da′b′∣m and hence M∣m, because M is da′b′ or −(da′b′).

step 1.2step 2.1L1L6L7L8L10L11
4.1

M=ℓ. By steps 3.1 and 3.2, M is a positive common multiple. If p is any positive common multiple, then M∣p by step 3.3 and p≠0, so ∣M∣≤∣p∣ by [L9], that is M≤p since both are positive. So M is the least positive common multiple, which is ℓ.

step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3L3L9L10
5.1

Clause 1 in this case now follows from step 3.3, since ℓ=M.

step 3.3step 4.1
5.2

Clause 2 in this case: dℓ=d⋅d ∣a′b′∣=∣d∣ ∣d∣ ∣a′∣ ∣b′∣=∣da′∣ ∣db′∣=∣(da′)(db′)∣=∣ab∣, using ∣d∣=d and multiplicativity of the absolute value throughout.

step 1.2step 4.1L1L10
6.1

The two cases of steps 1.1 and 1.2 are exhaustive, so clauses 1 and 2 hold for every pair a,b.

step 1.1step 5.1step 5.2cases-exhaustive∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

41 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources