How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
and ; equivalently, in the subgroup generated by is and
Statement
Let , and put
Then and are subgroups of (Subgroup), and
(Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention , Common multiple, and the least common multiple , taken to be when or ). Equivalently, in the group ,
(The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups). Since and , and every subgroup of has exactly one nonnegative generator (Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number ), these are identifications of subgroups by their canonical generator, not merely equalities of two sets that happen to coincide.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers and ; and .
is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, , , , multiplication distributes over addition, and every has an additive inverse; we write for (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
is an abelian group; is a subgroup for every ; and every subgroup equals for exactly one (Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number , Group and abelian group).
A subgroup contains the identity and is closed under the operation and under inverses; a nonempty with for all is a subgroup of (Subgroup, One-step subgroup test: a nonempty is a subgroup iff for all ; the identity and the inverses of are then those of ).
is the smallest subgroup containing : it contains and is contained in every subgroup containing (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
An intersection of subgroups is a subgroup (The intersection of a nonempty family of subgroups of is a subgroup of ).
means for some ; equivalently (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
and is a common divisor of and ; (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
and is a common multiple of and (Common multiple, and the least common multiple , taken to be when or ).
Every common multiple of and is a multiple of (Every common multiple of and is a multiple of , and ).
The image of is exactly the set of nonnegative integers, so every is for a unique (The naturals embed in the integers).
Proof
is a subgroup of : it contains , so is nonempty, and for and in the difference is by distributivity, so the one-step test applies.
. Since is a common divisor, write and ; then for all .
. If this is [L8]. If then . The two cases are exhaustive.
is a subgroup by [L2] and [L5], and by [L6] it is exactly the set of common multiples of and : says , and says .
. It contains and , so by [L4]. Conversely any subgroup containing and contains and by [L2] and [L4], hence contains for all by closure under the operation; taking gives .
Hence , because is a subgroup containing and is the smallest such. With step 1.2, .
: is a common multiple by [L9], so lies in the subgroup , and is the smallest subgroup containing .
: every common multiple satisfies by [L10], that is . With step 2.3, .
Both identities are proved, and in group-theoretic form they read by step 2.1 and step 2.2, and by step 3.1 and [L2].
Finally and , so each is for a natural by [L11], and by [L2] a subgroup of has exactly one such generator; hence and are the canonical generators of the two subgroups, and the identities identify the subgroups and not merely the underlying sets.
Remarks
-
This is the seam between the arithmetic and the group theory of this page, and it is the concrete shadow of the statement that is a principal ideal domain. Read from left to right, it says that the set of integer combinations of and is exactly the set of multiples of their greatest common divisor — which is Bézout's identity and the divisibility characterisation of packed into one equation between subgroups.
-
The classification is used for one thing only. Both inclusions above come from Bézout and divisibility; Every subgroup of is for exactly one natural number is invoked in step 5.1, for the uniqueness of the nonnegative generator, and nowhere else.
-
Boundary pairs. At the theorem reads and , using and ; at and it reads and . Both are true as stated, and neither needed a separate clause.
Depends on
- Bézout's identity: for integers $a, b$ not both zero, $\gcd(a,b)$ is the least positive element of $\{\, ax + by : x, y \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}$; in particular $ax + by = \gcd(a,b)$ has an integer solution
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- Common multiple, and the least common multiple $\operatorname{lcm}(a,b)$, taken to be $0$ when $a = 0$ or $b = 0$
- Every common multiple of $a$ and $b$ is a multiple of $\operatorname{lcm}(a,b)$, and $\gcd(a,b) \cdot \operatorname{lcm}(a,b) = |ab|$
- Every subgroup of $(\mathbb{Z}, +)$ is $\langle n \rangle = n\mathbb{Z}$ for exactly one natural number $n$
- Subgroup
- One-step subgroup test: a nonempty $H \subseteq G$ is a subgroup iff $gh^{-1} \in H$ for all $g, h \in H$; the identity and the inverses of $H$ are then those of $G$
- The intersection of a nonempty family of subgroups of $G$ is a subgroup of $G$
- The subgroup $\langle S \rangle$ generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup $\langle g \rangle$, and cyclic groups
- Group and abelian group
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- The integers form a commutative ring
- Arithmetic on the integers
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- The naturals embed in the integers
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 77 results over 25 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bézout's identity (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cyclic group (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Least common multiple (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)