How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bézout's identity: for integers not both zero, is the least positive element of ; in particular has an integer solution
Statement
Let , not both , and put
Then contains a positive element, and its least positive element is (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ). In particular there are integers with
so the equation is solvable in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integers and , not both ; the set ; and the embedding , , of The naturals embed in the integers.
is a commutative ring: addition and multiplication are associative and commutative, , , , multiplication distributes over addition, and every has an additive inverse , with and ; we write for (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
The order on is total, antisymmetric and transitive, is compatible with addition, and positives are closed under multiplication; means together with (The integers form a totally ordered ring, Order on the integers).
is injective, preserves addition, multiplication and order, and its image is exactly the nonnegative integers (The naturals embed in the integers, The natural numbers (von Neumann)).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle, Order on the natural numbers).
For and there are integers with and (Division with remainder in : for and there are unique with and ).
For , is the unique greatest element of the set of common divisors of and (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
means for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
Proof
If and then , and if moreover and then : for or the product is , and otherwise and , so because positives are closed under multiplication.
If and then : adding to gives , so by transitivity, and would give and hence by antisymmetry, contrary to .
for every , with when . By totality either , and step 1.1 applies directly, or , in which case by compatibility with addition and by step 1.1; the strict form follows since gives .
contains a positive element: , and one of is nonzero, so one of , is positive and the other is nonnegative, whence the sum is positive by step 1.2.
Let be the set of positive elements of and put . Every satisfies , hence for some with ; so is nonempty by step 3.1.
By well-ordering let be the least element of and put , so and ; fix with .
is the least element of : given , write with as in step 4.1; then , and applying , which preserves the order, gives .
. By [L5] with divisor write with . Then , so . If were positive it would lie in , so by step 6.1, which with contradicts antisymmetry. Hence is not positive; with this forces , so and .
, by the same argument with in place of : dividing by gives with , and , so as before.
So is a common divisor of and . Moreover every common divisor of and divides by [L7].
Since we have and , so every common divisor satisfies by [L8].
Therefore is the greatest element of , and greatest elements are unique, so by [L6]; the hypothesis that and are not both is what makes that clause of the definition apply.
Hence is the least positive element of by step 6.1, and by step 5.1: the equation is solvable.
Remarks
-
Where the work is. Two places, and both are easy to hand-wave. The first is that contains a positive element at all, which is what the hypothesis "not both zero" buys and which is proved through rather than by taking (that would need a case split on which of , is nonzero). The second is the last inequality: that every common divisor is below needs If and then and ; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by , not just , because divisibility is not the order of .
-
The hypothesis cannot be dropped. At the set is , which has no positive element, so "the least positive element of " names nothing; that is precisely the pair at which is fixed by convention (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
-
This is an existence statement. The coefficients come from a least element supplied by well-ordering, so nothing here computes them. The extended Euclidean algorithm: the same descent produces integers with , so Bézout coefficients are computed and not merely shown to exist does compute them.
Depends on
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on $\mathbb{Z}$, and is linear: if $d \mid a$ and $d \mid b$ then $d \mid ax + by$ for all integers $x, y$; also $d \mid a$ implies $d \mid ac$, $-d \mid a$ and $d \mid -a$
- If $d \mid a$ and $a \ne 0$ then $d \ne 0$ and $|d| \le |a|$; hence the set of divisors of a nonzero integer is bounded above by $|a|$
- Division with remainder in $\mathbb{Z}$: for $a \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $b > 0$ there are unique $q, r \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $a = qb + r$ and $0 \le r < b$
- The well-ordering principle
- The naturals embed in the integers
- The natural numbers $\mathbb{N}$ (von Neumann)
- Order on the natural numbers
- The absolute value $|a|$ of an integer
- Absolute value in $\mathbb{Z}$: $|a| \ge 0$; $|a| = 0$ exactly when $a = 0$; $|-a| = |a|$; $|ab| = |a|\,|b|$; $-|a| \le a \le |a|$; and $|a| \le c$ exactly when $-c \le a \le c$
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- Arithmetic on the integers
- Order on the integers
- The integers form a commutative ring
- The integers form a totally ordered ring
Used by
- Every common divisor of a and b divides gcd(a,b); consequently d = gcd(a,b) exactly when d ≥ 0, d ∣ a, d ∣ b, and every common divisor of a and b divides d — a characterisation that holds at (a,b) = (0,0) as well Corollary
- ax + by = c has an integer solution exactly when gcd(a,b) ∣ c: 6x + 15y = 9 is solvable and 6x + 15y = 7 is not Example
- Bézout coefficients are not unique: 1071 · (-3) + 462 · 7 = 21 and 1071 · 19 + 462 · (-44) = 21, and for nonzero a, b every solution has the form (x₀ + t b/d, y₀ - t a/d) Example
- gcd(1071, 462) = 21 by the Euclidean algorithm, with the back-substitution giving 21 = 7 · 462 - 3 · 1071 Example
- a and b are coprime if and only if ax + by = 1 for some integers x, y; and in that case the only common divisors of a and b are 1 and -1 Lemma
- gcd(ca, cb) = |c| gcd(a,b) for all integers a, b, c, the identity holding at c = 0 and at (a,b) = (0,0) as well Lemma
- A finite abelian group is the internal direct product of its primary components Theorem
- aℤ + bℤ = gcd(a,b) ℤ and aℤ ∩ bℤ = lcm(a,b) ℤ; equivalently, in (ℤ,+) the subgroup generated by {a,b} is ⟨ gcd(a,b) ⟩ and ⟨ a ⟩ ∩ ⟨ b ⟩ = ⟨ lcm(a,b) ⟩ Theorem
- For n≥1, [a]ₙ is a unit if and only if gcd(a,n)=1 Theorem
- For n≥1, ax≡ bpmod n is solvable exactly when gcd(a,n)∣ b, and then has exactly gcd(a,n) solution classes modulo n Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 55 results over 22 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bézout's identity (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Greatest common divisor (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)