How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If then the shift stabiliser of is trivial, so its orbit has exactly elements
Statement
Let and let be a word of length of integers whose weight is coprime to , that is (Coprime integers: , Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function). Then, for the action of on words of length by cyclic shifts (Cyclic shifting is an action of on the words of length over a set):
- the stabiliser of is the trivial subgroup (The orbit and stabilizer of a point in a group action);
- the orbit of is finite with exactly elements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a natural number and a word of length of integers with .
for , and is the unique with and (Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function).
for with ; ; and for every (Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function).
is the identity, , and is a well-defined left action of the additive group on the words of length (Cyclic shifting is an action of on the words of length over a set, clauses 1 and 2).
A property that holds at and passes from every natural number to its successor holds at every natural number: if a property satisfies and () for all , then holds for all (The principle of mathematical induction).
For , divides when for some (Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
For not both there are integers with (Bézout's identity: for integers not both zero, is the least positive element of ; in particular has an integer solution).
is the greatest common divisor of and , and when and are not both (Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor , with the convention ).
Integers and are coprime when (Coprime integers: ).
If and then for all (Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on , and is linear: if and then for all integers ; also implies , and , clause 3).
Every class in contains exactly one integer with , and (For , every class in has one representative with , so ; while is in bijection with ).
is a commutative ring under the induced operations, so its addition makes it an abelian group with identity (For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold).
If is finite and is a bijection then is finite and (The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
Suppose lies in the stabiliser of , with chosen as the representative supplied by [L8]. Then , that is for every with .
For every one has . At this is by [F2]. If it holds at , then applying the one-step difference identity of [F2] at and at gives and , and step 1.1 makes the two added letters equal, since and lies in the index range; so the identity holds at . Induction gives it for all .
For every one has : at both sides are , and the inductive step is step 2.1 with . Taking gives , while exhibits in the form with and , so by [F2]. Hence , and therefore divides .
Since , the pair , is not both zero, so [L4] gives integers with , which is by hypothesis and [L6]. Multiplying by gives ; by step 3.1 the integer divides , and it divides , so [L7] makes it divide . With this forces : writing , any would give and any would give . So the stabiliser contains only , which is clause 1.
The map sending to is surjective by the definition of the orbit and injective: if then applying the inverse of in the abelian group and using the action axioms of [L1] and [L9] gives , so by step 4.1 and . Since by [L8], transport along this bijection by [L10] makes the orbit finite with exactly elements, which is clause 2.
Remarks
-
The hypothesis is exactly what the Catalan application supplies. There the word has weight , and for every , so the orbit of every such word has full size and the count of orbits is the count of words divided by . Without a coprimality hypothesis a word can repeat: the word has weight and is fixed by the shift by two positions.
-
No orbit-stabiliser theorem is used. The orbit size is obtained from the injectivity of , which is what a trivial stabiliser says directly; invoking the coset bijection would then require counting the cosets of the trivial subgroup, which is the same computation one step further away.
Depends on
- Cyclic shifting is an action of $\mathbb{Z}/m$ on the words of length $m$ over a set
- Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function
- The orbit $G\cdot x$ and stabilizer $G_x$ of a point in a group action
- Bézout's identity: for integers $a, b$ not both zero, $\gcd(a,b)$ is the least positive element of $\{\, ax + by : x, y \in \mathbb{Z} \,\}$; in particular $ax + by = \gcd(a,b)$ has an integer solution
- Common divisor, and the greatest common divisor $\gcd(a,b)$, with the convention $\gcd(0,0) := 0$
- Coprime integers: $\gcd(a,b) = 1$
- Divisibility is reflexive and transitive on $\mathbb{Z}$, and is linear: if $d \mid a$ and $d \mid b$ then $d \mid ax + by$ for all integers $x, y$; also $d \mid a$ implies $d \mid ac$, $-d \mid a$ and $d \mid -a$
- Divisibility in $\mathbb{Z}$: $d \mid a$ when $a = dq$ for some integer $q$
- For $n\ge 1$, every class in $\mathbb{Z}/n$ has one representative $r$ with $0\le r<n$, so $\lvert\mathbb{Z}/n\rvert=n$; while $\mathbb{Z}/0$ is in bijection with $\mathbb{Z}$
- For every natural $n$, $(\mathbb{Z}/n,+)$ is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold
- The principle of mathematical induction
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
Used by
- (2n+1) Cₙ=C(2n+1, n), a second derivation of the Catalan count Theorem
- The Chung–Feller theorem: for each k with 0≤ k≤ n, exactly Cₙ of the diagonal paths from (0,0) to (2n,0) have exactly 2k steps lying above level 0 Theorem
- The cycle lemma (Dvoretzky–Motzkin): if every aᵢ≤1 and ‖ a‖=k≥1, then exactly k of the m cyclic shifts of a have all partial sums positive Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. Postnikov (notes by A. Lin), MIT 18.212 Algebraic Combinatorics, Spring 2019, Claim 10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- N. Dershowitz and S. Zaks, "The Cycle Lemma and Some Applications", Europ. J. Combinatorics 11 (1990) 35–40, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)