How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cyclic shifting is an action of on the words of length over a set
Statement
Let be a set and , and let be the set of words of length over , with the shifts of Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function.
- is the identity of , and for all and .
- whenever . Hence is a well-defined left action of the additive group (The congruence class and the quotient set , For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold) on , in the sense of Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions.
- For every the number of positions of carrying the letter equals the number of positions of carrying . In particular, for a word of integers, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a set , a natural number , and words of length over .
for , where is the unique with and ; and for a word of integers (Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function).
A left action of a group with identity on a set is a function with and for all and (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
holds exactly when (The congruence class and the quotient set ).
is a commutative ring under the induced operations, so in particular its addition makes it an abelian group with identity (For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold).
For a commutative monoid and , if is a permutation of the von Neumann natural and for every , then (Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either, clause 3).
If is finite and is a bijection then is finite and (The cardinality of a finite set).
For : is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ( is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ; such a is unique, equals the inverse relation , and is itself a bijection).
Proof
For every integer and every one has , because is a multiple of and adding a multiple of to the argument changes neither the remainder nor its defining inequalities.
The map is a permutation of : the map is a two-sided inverse of it, since by step 1.1 both composites send to , which is for .
Clause 1 holds: for , and using step 1.1.
Clause 2 holds: if then for every , since the two arguments differ by a multiple of , so ; by [L2] the rule is therefore well defined on , and by [L3] together with clause 1 it satisfies the two axioms of [L1] with .
Clause 3 holds: by step 2.1 the map is a permutation of the index set, and it carries the positions of carrying bijectively onto the positions of carrying , since exactly when ; so the two counts agree by [L5]. For a word of integers, [L4] applied with gives .
The three clauses are established.
Remarks
-
Why the acting group is and not . Both act, and the -action factors through by clause 2. Taking the finite group is what makes the orbit and stabiliser counts below available, and it is the only reason the reduction is recorded.
-
Clause 3 is what confines the action to a level set. The shift preserves the number of positions carrying each letter, so it acts on the words with a prescribed letter count and on the words of a prescribed weight. The cycle lemma is a statement about one such orbit.
Depends on
- Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function
- Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
- The congruence class $[a]_n$ and the quotient set $\mathbb{Z}/n$
- For every natural $n$, $(\mathbb{Z}/n,+)$ is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold
- Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- $f : A \to B$ is a bijection if and only if there is a function $g : B \to A$ with $g \circ f = \Delta_A$ and $f \circ g = \Delta_B$; such a $g$ is unique, equals the inverse relation $f^{-1}$, and is itself a bijection
Used by
- If gcd(‖ a‖,m)=1 then the shift stabiliser of a is trivial, so its orbit has exactly m elements Lemma
- (2n+1) Cₙ=C(2n+1, n), a second derivation of the Catalan count Theorem
- The Chung–Feller theorem: for each k with 0≤ k≤ n, exactly Cₙ of the diagonal paths from (0,0) to (2n,0) have exactly 2k steps lying above level 0 Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. Dershowitz and S. Zaks, "The Cycle Lemma and Some Applications", Europ. J. Combinatorics 11 (1990) 35–40, §1 (standard reference, not scraped)