How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ; such a is unique, equals the inverse relation , and is itself a bijection
Statement
Let . Then is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and . When such a exists it is unique, it is the inverse relation , and it is itself a bijection .
No choice principle is used: the value is the unique with , so it is determined rather than selected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a function .
is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all (Injection, surjection, bijection).
is surjective (onto) if for every there is some with (Injection, surjection, bijection).
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
holds if and only if (The inverse relation , the composite , and the restriction ).
is a function, , and for every in that domain (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
is a function with and for every (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
if and only if and for every (Functions and are equal if and only if and for every in that common domain).
holds if and only if and (The identity relation and the membership relation ).
Proof
Suppose is a bijection. The inverse relation is a function: if and lie in it then , so by injectivity. Its domain is , which is by surjectivity, and its range is ; hence .
Conversely, suppose satisfies and . If then , so is injective; and any satisfies , so is a value of and is surjective. Hence is a bijection.
Any two such functions agree: if and both satisfy the two identities then, for , , so ; both have domain , so .
For a bijection , the function of step 1.1 satisfies the two identities: and are functions with domain , and for ; likewise and are functions with domain agreeing at every point.
Such a is itself a bijection: is a function with and , which is the hypothesis of step 1.2 applied to in place of .
Such a is the inverse relation: satisfies the two identities by step 2.1, and step 1.3 says there is only one function that does.
The two directions, the uniqueness, the identification with and the bijectivity of are established, which is the statement.
Depends on
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- The inverse relation $R^{-1}$, the composite $S \circ R$, and the restriction $R \restriction A$
- If $f$ and $g$ are functions then $g \circ f$ is a function with domain $f^{-1}[\operatorname{dom} g]$ and $(g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))$ there; $\Delta_A$ is a function with $\Delta_A(a) = a$; and $f \circ \Delta_A = f = \Delta_B \circ f$ for $f : A \to B$
- The identity relation $\Delta_A = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a = b\,\}$ and the membership relation $\in_A\, = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a \in b\,\}$
- Functions $f$ and $g$ are equal if and only if $\operatorname{dom} f = \operatorname{dom} g$ and $f(x) = g(x)$ for every $x$ in that common domain
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
- $T \circ (S \circ R) = (T \circ S) \circ R$, $(S \circ R)^{-1} = R^{-1} \circ S^{-1}$, $(R^{-1})^{-1} = R$, $\operatorname{dom}(R^{-1}) = \operatorname{ran} R$, and $\Delta_B \circ R = R = R \circ \Delta_A$ for a relation $R$ from $A$ to $B$
Used by
- Mₙ=∑_k∈ℕ, 2k≤ nC(n, 2k)Cₖ Corollary
- Rₙ=∑ₖ₌₀ⁿC(n+k, 2k)Cₖ Corollary
- The number of diagonal paths from (0,a) to (n,b) is C(n, u) for the natural number u with 2u=n+b-a, and 0 when no such u exists Corollary
- The weak ballot count: for p≥ q≥0 the orderings in which the first candidate is never behind satisfy (p+1) N=(p-q+1)C(p+q, q) Corollary
- The distributive and exponential laws of sets are natural isomorphisms Example
- Cyclic shifting is an action of ℤ/m on the words of length m over a set Lemma
- Every Dyck path of semilength n+1 factors uniquely as U P D Q with P inDᵢ and Q inDₙ₋ᵢ Lemma
- For each start point the step word is a bijection onto Sⁿ Lemma
- If every aᵢ≤1 and ‖ a‖≥1, the strict right minima form a two-sided increasing list on which Sₐ increases by exactly 1 at each successive index Lemma
- Reflecting the initial segment at the first visit to level c Lemma
- The two step sets describe the same objects: U↦ N, D↦ E is a bijection matching the diagonal y=x with the level 0 Lemma
- A functor is an isomorphism of categories exactly when its object and morphism maps are bijective Proposition
- The Axiom of Choice is stated on this page and assumed by no proof on it; the two statements that would need it are identified and left unsettled Remark
- (2n+1) Cₙ=C(2n+1, n), a second derivation of the Catalan count Theorem
- Bertrand's ballot problem: for p>q≥0 the orderings in which the first candidate is strictly ahead throughout satisfy (p+q) N=(p-q)C(p+q, p) Theorem
- Bₙ is exactly the set of words of length 2n over {texttt(,texttt)} in which every prefix has at least as many texttt( as texttt) and the totals are equal Theorem
- lvertM((0,0),(m,n))|=C(m+n, n) Theorem
- M(x)=1+x M(x)+x²M(x)², and 2x²M(x)=1-x-(1-2x-3x²)^1/2 Theorem
- R(x)=1+x R(x)+x R(x)², and 2x R(x)=1-x-(1-6x+x²)^1/2 Theorem
- The Chung–Feller theorem: for each k with 0≤ k≤ n, exactly Cₙ of the diagonal paths from (0,0) to (2n,0) have exactly 2k steps lying above level 0 Theorem
- There is a bijection Tₙ toDₙ for every n Theorem
- There is a bijection Tₙ toPₙ₊₂ for every n∈ℕ Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Inverse function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)