How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ; such a is unique, equals the inverse relation , and is itself a bijection
Statement
Let . Then is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and . When such a exists it is unique, it is the inverse relation , and it is itself a bijection .
No choice principle is used: the value is the unique with , so it is determined rather than selected.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a function .
is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all (Injection, surjection, bijection).
is surjective (onto) if for every there is some with (Injection, surjection, bijection).
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
holds if and only if (The inverse relation , the composite , and the restriction ).
is a function, , and for every in that domain (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
is a function with and for every (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
if and only if and for every (Functions and are equal if and only if and for every in that common domain).
holds if and only if and (The identity relation and the membership relation ).
Proof
Suppose is a bijection. The inverse relation is a function: if and lie in it then , so by injectivity. Its domain is , which is by surjectivity, and its range is ; hence .
Conversely, suppose satisfies and . If then , so is injective; and any satisfies , so is a value of and is surjective. Hence is a bijection.
Any two such functions agree: if and both satisfy the two identities then, for , , so ; both have domain , so .
For a bijection , the function of step 1.1 satisfies the two identities: and are functions with domain , and for ; likewise and are functions with domain agreeing at every point.
Such a is itself a bijection: is a function with and , which is the hypothesis of step 1.2 applied to in place of .
Such a is the inverse relation: satisfies the two identities by step 2.1, and step 1.3 says there is only one function that does.
The two directions, the uniqueness, the identification with and the bijectivity of are established, which is the statement.
Depends on
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- The inverse relation $R^{-1}$, the composite $S \circ R$, and the restriction $R \restriction A$
- If $f$ and $g$ are functions then $g \circ f$ is a function with domain $f^{-1}[\operatorname{dom} g]$ and $(g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))$ there; $\Delta_A$ is a function with $\Delta_A(a) = a$; and $f \circ \Delta_A = f = \Delta_B \circ f$ for $f : A \to B$
- The identity relation $\Delta_A = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a = b\,\}$ and the membership relation $\in_A\, = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a \in b\,\}$
- Functions $f$ and $g$ are equal if and only if $\operatorname{dom} f = \operatorname{dom} g$ and $f(x) = g(x)$ for every $x$ in that common domain
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
- $T \circ (S \circ R) = (T \circ S) \circ R$, $(S \circ R)^{-1} = R^{-1} \circ S^{-1}$, $(R^{-1})^{-1} = R$, $\operatorname{dom}(R^{-1}) = \operatorname{ran} R$, and $\Delta_B \circ R = R = R \circ \Delta_A$ for a relation $R$ from $A$ to $B$
Used by
- The distributive and exponential laws of sets are natural isomorphisms Example
- A functor is an isomorphism of categories exactly when its object and morphism maps are bijective Proposition
- The Axiom of Choice is stated on this page and assumed by no proof on it; the two statements that would need it are identified and left unsettled Remark
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 26 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Inverse function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)