How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For with : is injective if and only if there is with ; for the empty function is injective and has a left inverse if and only if
Statement
Let .
- (i) If , then is injective if and only if there is a function with .
- (ii) If , then and is injective; and there is a function with if and only if .
The hypothesis in (i) is not removable: for and the empty function is injective and has no left inverse at all.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a function .
is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all (Injection, surjection, bijection).
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
is a function, , and for every in that domain (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
is a function with and for every (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
holds if and only if and (The identity relation and the membership relation ).
For any parameters and any set , there is a set whose elements are exactly the elements of for which holds (The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula , ).
holds if and only if for some (The image and the preimage of a set under a relation).
There is exactly one set with no elements, written (There is exactly one set with no elements, written ).
holds if and only if for some and some (The Cartesian product ).
if and only if or (, , , ; if and only if or ; and for nonempty and , if and only if and ).
Proof
Claim (i), from right to left: if and for , then .
Claim (i), from left to right: assume injective and , and fix . Separating inside gives the set . For the first alternative supplies exactly one , by injectivity, and the second supplies none; for with the first supplies none, since , and the second supplies alone. Hence is a function with domain and range inside , so .
Claim (ii): if then , so has no element and ; the injectivity condition quantifies over elements of and holds vacuously.
Claim (i) concluded: with as in step 1.2, and are functions with domain , and for every , since selects the first alternative; so the two functions are equal.
Claim (ii) concluded: a function has , so , giving and . Conversely, if then is a function , and and are both , so the identity holds.
Claims (i) and (ii) are established, which is the statement.
Remarks
- Why the surjective analogue is missing. The corresponding statement, that every surjection has a right inverse, is not proved on this page: it is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, which this page states at The Axiom of Choice and assumes in no proof, and choosing one preimage for each point of the codomain is exactly the simultaneous selection no proof here makes. The Axiom of Choice is stated on this page and assumed by no proof on it; the two statements that would need it are identified and left unsettled records where that boundary falls.
Depends on
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- If $f$ and $g$ are functions then $g \circ f$ is a function with domain $f^{-1}[\operatorname{dom} g]$ and $(g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))$ there; $\Delta_A$ is a function with $\Delta_A(a) = a$; and $f \circ \Delta_A = f = \Delta_B \circ f$ for $f : A \to B$
- The identity relation $\Delta_A = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a = b\,\}$ and the membership relation $\in_A\, = \{\,(a,b) \in A \times A : a \in b\,\}$
- The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula $\varphi$, $\forall \bar p\,\forall x\,\exists y\,\forall z\,(z \in y \leftrightarrow (z \in x \wedge \varphi(z,\bar p)))$
- The image $R[A]$ and the preimage $R^{-1}[B]$ of a set under a relation
- There is exactly one set with no elements, written $\varnothing$
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- $A \times (B \cup C) = (A \times B) \cup (A \times C)$, $A \times (B \cap C) = (A \times B) \cap (A \times C)$, $A \times (B \setminus C) = (A \times B) \setminus (A \times C)$, $(A \cap B) \times (C \cap D) = (A \times C) \cap (B \times D)$; $A \times B = \varnothing$ if and only if $A = \varnothing$ or $B = \varnothing$; and for nonempty $A$ and $B$, $A \times B \subseteq C \times D$ if and only if $A \subseteq C$ and $B \subseteq D$
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Inverse function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)