How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, , , ; if and only if or ; and for nonempty and , if and only if and
Statement
For all sets , , , :
- (i) ;
- (ii) ;
- (iii) ;
- (iv) ;
- (v) if and only if or ;
- (vi) if and , then if and only if and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: sets , , , .
holds if and only if for some and some (The Cartesian product ).
if and only if and ( if and only if and ).
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
holds if and only if and (, , , , and ).
holds exactly when and (The difference , the symmetric difference , and the complement relative to a set ).
means that every element of is an element of (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ).
There is exactly one set with no elements, written (There is exactly one set with no elements, written ).
If every satisfies if and only if , then (The Axiom of Extensionality: ).
, and is the set whose elements are exactly the elements of the elements of (The union of a set, and the binary union ).
For , is the set whose elements are exactly the sets belonging to every element of (The intersection of a nonempty set, the binary intersection , and disjointness).
Proof
Membership criterion: for all sets and , holds if and only if and . Indeed, an element of is a pair with and , and forces and ; the converse is immediate from the description of . Every element of a product is a pair, so it suffices in each identity below to compare pairs.
Claim (i): holds exactly when and or , that is, exactly when or .
Claim (ii): holds exactly when , and , that is, exactly when and .
Claim (iii): holds exactly when , and . On the other side, holds exactly when , , and it is not the case that and ; given , that last condition is .
Claim (iv): holds exactly when , , and , that is, exactly when and .
Claim (v): if or then no pair satisfies the membership criterion, so has no elements and equals ; conversely if both are nonempty, fix and , and then .
Claim (vi): assume and . If , fix ; for any the pair lies in , hence in , so , and follows; fixing and running the same argument on the second coordinate gives . Conversely, if and , then any has and , so it lies in .
Claims (i) to (vi) are established, which is the statement.
Depends on
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- $(a,b) = (c,d)$ if and only if $a = c$ and $b = d$
- The Kuratowski ordered pair $(a,b) := \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}$
- The union $\bigcup x$ of a set, and the binary union $a \cup b := \bigcup \{a,b\}$
- The intersection $\bigcap x$ of a nonempty set, the binary intersection $a \cap b := \bigcap\{a,b\}$, and disjointness
- $\bigcup \varnothing = \varnothing$, $\bigcup \{a\} = a$, $\bigcup \{a,b\} = a \cup b$, $\bigcap \{a\} = a$, and $\bigcap \{a,b\} = a \cap b$
- The difference $a \setminus b$, the symmetric difference $a \triangle b$, and the complement $X \setminus a$ relative to a set $X$
- Subset $x \subseteq y$, proper subset $x \subsetneq y$, and the separation notation $\{\, z \in x : \varphi(z) \,\}$
- There is exactly one set with no elements, written $\varnothing$
- The Axiom of Extensionality: $\forall x\,\forall y\,(\forall z\,(z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y)$
Used by
- For f : A → B with A ≠ ∅: f is injective if and only if there is g : B → A with g ∘ f = Δ_A; for A = ∅ the empty function is injective and has a left inverse if and only if B = ∅ Corollary
- ∅ is a relation on every set, is the unique equivalence relation on ∅, is a function ∅ → B for every B, is a bijection ∅ → ∅, and is not a surjection ∅ → {∅} Example
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 20 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cartesian product (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Algebra of sets (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)