Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)verified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Kuratowski ordered pair (a,b):={{a},{a,b}}(a,b) := \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}

Definition

For sets aa and bb, the ordered pair (a,b)(a,b) is the set

(a,b):={{a},{a,b}},(a,b) := \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\},

formed from the unordered pairs and singletons of The unordered pair {x,y}\{x,y\} and the singleton {x}={x,x}\{x\} = \{x,x\}; three applications of The Axiom of Pairing: xyzt(tz(t=xt=y))\forall x\,\forall y\,\exists z\,\forall t\,(t \in z \leftrightarrow (t = x \vee t = y)) produce it. The first coordinate is aa and the second is bb.

When a=ba = b the two members coincide, since {a,b}={a,a}={a}\{a,b\} = \{a,a\} = \{a\}, and the pair degenerates to (a,a)={{a}}(a,a) = \{\{a\}\}.

Remarks

  • Why this set and not another. An ordered pair is required to satisfy one property, that (a,b)=(c,d)(a,b) = (c,d) exactly when a=ca = c and b=db = d; that is (a,b)=(c,d)(a,b) = (c,d) if and only if a=ca = c and b=db = d, and it is the only thing any later construction uses. Other definitions with the same property exist, and nothing below distinguishes them from this one.

  • The degenerate case is where a careless proof fails. An argument that treats {{a},{a,b}}\{\{a\},\{a,b\}\} as a set with two distinct members breaks at a=ba = b, and that case has to be handled separately in the proof of the characterising property.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 4 results over 3 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources