How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If then
Statement
For all sets and , if then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: sets and with ; the Axiom of Foundation, through the result cited as [L3].
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
, the singleton of , is the set whose only element is (The unordered pair and the singleton ).
There are no sets and with and (Under Foundation, for every set , there are no sets with , and there are no sets with ).
Proof
, so ; likewise .
By hypothesis the two sets are equal, so and ; hence or , and or .
If then both alternatives and fail, leaving and , which is impossible; therefore .
Remarks
- The general statement, and its special case for . This holds for all sets and is proved from Foundation. The corresponding clause for the natural numbers, that the successor is injective on , is part (P2) of The von Neumann naturals form a Peano system ↗, which proves it by a different route that does not use Foundation.
Depends on
- Under Foundation, $x \notin x$ for every set $x$, there are no sets with $x \in y \in x$, and there are no sets with $x \in y \in z \in x$
- The union $\bigcup x$ of a set, and the binary union $a \cup b := \bigcup \{a,b\}$
- The unordered pair $\{x,y\}$ and the singleton $\{x\} = \{x,x\}$
- $\bigcup \varnothing = \varnothing$, $\bigcup \{a\} = a$, $\bigcup \{a,b\} = a \cup b$, $\bigcap \{a\} = a$, and $\bigcap \{a,b\} = a \cap b$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), Lemma 13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of regularity (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of infinity (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)