How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
listed in full, together with the inclusion in that makes it a set
Example
Put and . Then
a set with two elements, namely the pairs and . Here , and both elements lie in , which is the ambient set the product is separated inside.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and .
holds if and only if for some and some (The Cartesian product ).
If and , then (If and then ).
is the set whose elements are exactly and , and (The unordered pair and the singleton ).
holds if and only if or (, , , , and ).
If every satisfies if and only if , then (The Axiom of Extensionality: ).
There is exactly one set with no elements (There is exactly one set with no elements, written ).
holds if and only if (The power set ).
means that every element of is an element of (Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation ).
Verification
: an element of is or is an element of , and , so the two sets have the same elements.
The only element of is , and the elements of are and , so the pairs with first coordinate in and second in are exactly and ; unfolding the definition of the ordered pair, these are and .
Hence has exactly those two elements, and they are distinct because belongs to the second and not to the first.
Both elements lie in : this is the general fact applied with , and it is also visible directly, since each is a set of subsets of .
The product is listed in full and its two elements are exhibited inside the ambient double power set that makes the separation legitimate.
Depends on
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- If $a \in A$ and $b \in B$ then $(a,b) \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B))$
- The power set $\mathcal{P}(x) = \{\, z : z \subseteq x \,\}$
- The Kuratowski ordered pair $(a,b) := \{\{a\},\{a,b\}\}$
- The union $\bigcup x$ of a set, and the binary union $a \cup b := \bigcup \{a,b\}$
- $\bigcup \varnothing = \varnothing$, $\bigcup \{a\} = a$, $\bigcup \{a,b\} = a \cup b$, $\bigcap \{a\} = a$, and $\bigcap \{a,b\} = a \cap b$
- The unordered pair $\{x,y\}$ and the singleton $\{x\} = \{x,x\}$
- There is exactly one set with no elements, written $\varnothing$
- The Axiom of Extensionality: $\forall x\,\forall y\,(\forall z\,(z \in x \leftrightarrow z \in y) \to x = y)$
- Subset $x \subseteq y$, proper subset $x \subsetneq y$, and the separation notation $\{\, z \in x : \varphi(z) \,\}$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cartesian product (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), Def. 10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Wilson, A Brief Introduction to ZFC (Chicago REU 2016), Def. 2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)