How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula ,
Definition
Let be a formula of the language of set theory (The first-order language of set theory: , , formulas with parameters, and class abbreviations) in which the variable does not occur free. The Separation instance for is the sentence
The Axiom Schema of Separation is the collection of all these sentences, one for each such . In words: for any parameters and any set , there is a set whose elements are exactly the elements of for which holds.
It is a schema and not a single axiom because ranges over the formulas of the language, of which there are infinitely many, and the language provides no way to quantify over them.
Remarks
-
The side condition is not decoration. If were allowed to occur free in , the instance would assert that some satisfies for every , which is contradictory as soon as has a member. Requiring to be fresh is what keeps the schema consistent.
-
One parameter or a list. Some presentations state the schema with a single parameter rather than a list ; the two forms prove the same theorems, since a finite list can be coded once ordered pairs are available. The list form is used here because the instances below quantify over several sets at once.
-
A separated set is unique. The instance is stated with , so any two sets it produces have the same elements and are equal by The Axiom of Extensionality: . That is what licenses the notation introduced at Subset , proper subset , and the separation notation .
Depends on
Used by
- For a nonempty index set I: B ∩ ⋃_i ∈ I Aᵢ = ⋃_i ∈ I (B ∩ Aᵢ), B ∪ ⋂_i ∈ I Aᵢ = ⋂_i ∈ I (B ∪ Aᵢ), X ∖ ⋃_i ∈ I Aᵢ = ⋂_i ∈ I (X ∖ Aᵢ), and X ∖ ⋂_i ∈ I Aᵢ = ⋃_i ∈ I (X ∖ Aᵢ) Corollary
- For f : A → B with A ≠ ∅: f is injective if and only if there is g : B → A with g ∘ f = Δ_A; for A = ∅ the empty function is injective and has a left inverse if and only if B = ∅ Corollary
- There is no set U with y ∈ U for every set y Corollary
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/∼ Definition
- Subset x ⊆ y, proper subset x ⊊ y, and the separation notation { z ∈ x : φ(z) } Definition
- The Cartesian product A × B := { z ∈ P(P(A ∪ B)) : ∃ a ∈ A ∃ b ∈ B z = (a,b) } Definition
- The difference a ∖ b, the symmetric difference a triangle b, and the complement X ∖ a relative to a set X Definition
- The identity relation Δ_A = { (a,b) ∈ A × A : a = b } and the membership relation ∈_A = { (a,b) ∈ A × A : a ∈ b } Definition
- The image R[A] and the preimage R⁻¹[B] of a set under a relation Definition
- The natural numbers ℕ (von Neumann) Definition
- For any indexed family the product ∏_i ∈ I P(Xᵢ) contains the constant function with value ∅, and ∏_i ∈ I {i} has exactly one element Example
- FALSE: assuming ZF is consistent, ZF proves that every surjection f : A → B has a right inverse g : B → A with f ∘ g = Δ_B False statement
- FALSE: for every formula φ of the language of set theory there is a set { x : φ(x) } False statement
- For a function f : A → B the relation ker f := { (a,a') ∈ A × A : f(a) = f(a') } is an equivalence relation on A Lemma
- For a set x ≠ ∅ the collection { z : ∀ s (s ∈ x → z ∈ s) } is a set, and it does not depend on the member of x used to separate it Lemma
- For an indexed family (Aᵢ)_i ∈ I the collection of functions f with domain I and f(i) ∈ Aᵢ for every i ∈ I is a set Lemma
- For every set x there is exactly one set whose elements are precisely the subsets of x Lemma
- For I = {∅,{∅}} with A_∅ = A and A_{∅} = B, the map f ↦ (f(∅), f({∅})) is a bijection ∏_i ∈ I Aᵢ → A × B Lemma
- For relations R and S and a set A, the collections { (b,a) : (a,b) ∈ R }, { (a,c) : ∃ b ((a,b) ∈ R ∧ (b,c) ∈ S) } and { (a,b) ∈ R : a ∈ A } are sets Lemma
- For sets A and B the collection of all functions A → B is a set, being a subset of P(A × B) Lemma
- If every element of R is an ordered pair, then { a : ∃ b (a,b) ∈ R } and { b : ∃ a (a,b) ∈ R } are sets, both included in ⋃⋃ R Lemma
- The natural numbers exist: a smallest inductive set Lemma
- ∏_i ∈ ∅ Aᵢ = {∅}; if Aⱼ = ∅ for some j ∈ I then ∏_i ∈ I Aᵢ = ∅; and for I = {j} the evaluation f ↦ f(j) is a bijection ∏_i ∈ I Aᵢ → Aⱼ Proposition
- Separation and Replacement build subsets of sets already in hand, which is exactly what blocks Russell's construction Remark
- The axiom ledger for this page: which of the ZFC axioms each construction and each result actually consumes Remark
- a ∩ (b ∪ c) = (a ∩ b) ∪ (a ∩ c) and a ∪ (b ∩ c) = (a ∪ b) ∩ (a ∪ c); and for a nonempty set F, a ∩ ⋃ F = ⋃ { a ∩ b : b ∈ F } and a ∪ ⋂ F = ⋂ { a ∪ b : b ∈ F } Theorem
- Let ∼ be an equivalence relation on A with quotient map π : A → A/∼, and let f : A → B. There is a function g : A/∼ → B with g ∘ π = f if and only if a ∼ a' implies f(a) = f(a'); and such a g is then unique Theorem
- On a set A, R ↦ R ∖ Δ_A and S ↦ S ∪ Δ_A are mutually inverse bijections between the partial orders on A and the irreflexive, transitive relations on A; R ∖ Δ_A is the strict order of R, and every irreflexive transitive relation is asymmetric Theorem
- There is exactly one set with no elements, written ∅ Theorem
- X ∖ (a ∪ b) = (X ∖ a) ∩ (X ∖ b) and X ∖ (a ∩ b) = (X ∖ a) ∪ (X ∖ b); and for a nonempty set F, X ∖ ⋃ F = ⋂ { X ∖ a : a ∈ F } and X ∖ ⋂ F = ⋃ { X ∖ a : a ∈ F } Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 1 result over 1 level. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), Axiom 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom schema of specification (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)