Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

X∖(a∪b)=(X∖a)∩(X∖b) and X∖(a∩b)=(X∖a)∪(X∖b); and for a nonempty set F, X∖⋃F=⋂{ X∖a:a∈F } and X∖⋂F=⋃{ X∖a:a∈F }

Statement

For all sets X, a and b,

X∖(a∪b)=(X∖a)∩(X∖b),X∖(a∩b)=(X∖a)∪(X∖b).

Let F be a set with F≠∅. Then { X∖a:a∈F } is a nonempty set and

X∖⋃F=⋂{ X∖a:a∈F },X∖⋂F=⋃{ X∖a:a∈F }.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: sets X, a, b, and a set F with F≠∅ where the family forms are concerned.

[L4]

⋃x is the set whose elements are exactly the elements of the elements of x (The union ⋃x of a set, and the binary union a∪b:=⋃{a,b}).

[L5]

For x≠∅, ⋂x is the set whose elements are exactly the sets belonging to every element of x (The intersection ⋂x of a nonempty set, the binary intersection a∩b:=⋂{a,b}, and disjointness).

[L6]

For any parameters pˉ and any set x, there is a set y whose elements are exactly the elements z of x for which φ(z,pˉ) holds (The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula φ, ∀pˉ ∀x ∃y ∀z (z∈y↔(z∈x∧φ(z,pˉ)))).

[L7]

z∈P(x) holds if and only if z⊆x (The power set P(x)={ z:z⊆x }).

[L9]

If every z satisfies z∈x if and only if z∈y, then x=y (The Axiom of Extensionality: ∀x ∀y (∀z (z∈x↔z∈y)→x=y)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every X∖a is a subset of X, so the class { X∖a:a∈F } is the separated set { w∈P(X):∃a (a∈F∧w=X∖a) }, hence a set; and it has a member because F does.

L1L6L7L8
1.2

z∈X∖(a∪b) holds exactly when z∈X and neither z∈a nor z∈b, that is, exactly when z∈X and z∉a, and z∈X and z∉b; this is z∈(X∖a)∩(X∖b).

L1L2L3L9
1.3

z∈X∖(a∩b) holds exactly when z∈X and not both z∈a and z∈b, that is, exactly when z∈X and z∉a, or z∈X and z∉b; this is z∈(X∖a)∪(X∖b).

L1L2L3L9
2.1

z∈X∖⋃F holds exactly when z∈X and no member s of F has z∈s, that is, exactly when z∈X∖a for every a∈F; the sets X∖a with a∈F are precisely the elements of { X∖a:a∈F }, which is nonempty, so this is z∈⋂{ X∖a:a∈F }.

L1L4L5L9step 1.1
2.2

z∈X∖⋂F holds exactly when z∈X and z fails to lie in some member a of F, that is, exactly when z∈X∖a for some a∈F; this is z∈⋃{ X∖a:a∈F }.

L1L4L5L9step 1.1
3.1

The two finite laws and the two family laws are established, which is the statement.

step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources