Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-06 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

X(ab)=(Xa)(Xb)X \setminus (a \cup b) = (X \setminus a) \cap (X \setminus b) and X(ab)=(Xa)(Xb)X \setminus (a \cap b) = (X \setminus a) \cup (X \setminus b); and for a nonempty set FF, XF={Xa:aF}X \setminus \bigcup F = \bigcap \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\} and XF={Xa:aF}X \setminus \bigcap F = \bigcup \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}

Statement

For all sets XX, aa and bb,

X(ab)=(Xa)(Xb),X(ab)=(Xa)(Xb).X \setminus (a \cup b) = (X \setminus a) \cap (X \setminus b), \qquad X \setminus (a \cap b) = (X \setminus a) \cup (X \setminus b).

Let FF be a set with FF \neq \varnothing. Then {Xa:aF}\{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\} is a nonempty set and

XF={Xa:aF},XF={Xa:aF}.X \setminus \bigcup F = \bigcap \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}, \qquad X \setminus \bigcap F = \bigcup \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: sets XX, aa, bb, and a set FF with FF \neq \varnothing where the family forms are concerned.

[L1]

zabz \in a \setminus b holds exactly when zaz \in a and zbz \notin b (The difference aba \setminus b, the symmetric difference aba \triangle b, and the complement XaX \setminus a relative to a set XX).

[L4]

x\bigcup x is the set whose elements are exactly the elements of the elements of xx (The union x\bigcup x of a set, and the binary union ab:={a,b}a \cup b := \bigcup \{a,b\}).

[L5]

For xx \neq \varnothing, x\bigcap x is the set whose elements are exactly the sets belonging to every element of xx (The intersection x\bigcap x of a nonempty set, the binary intersection ab:={a,b}a \cap b := \bigcap\{a,b\}, and disjointness).

[L7]

zP(x)z \in \mathcal{P}(x) holds if and only if zxz \subseteq x (The power set P(x)={z:zx}\mathcal{P}(x) = \{\, z : z \subseteq x \,\}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every XaX \setminus a is a subset of XX, so the class {Xa:aF}\{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\} is the separated set {wP(X):a(aFw=Xa)}\{\, w \in \mathcal{P}(X) : \exists a\,(a \in F \wedge w = X \setminus a) \,\}, hence a set; and it has a member because FF does.

L1L6L7L8
1.2

zX(ab)z \in X \setminus (a \cup b) holds exactly when zXz \in X and neither zaz \in a nor zbz \in b, that is, exactly when zXz \in X and zaz \notin a, and zXz \in X and zbz \notin b; this is z(Xa)(Xb)z \in (X \setminus a) \cap (X \setminus b).

L1L2L3L9
1.3

zX(ab)z \in X \setminus (a \cap b) holds exactly when zXz \in X and not both zaz \in a and zbz \in b, that is, exactly when zXz \in X and zaz \notin a, or zXz \in X and zbz \notin b; this is z(Xa)(Xb)z \in (X \setminus a) \cup (X \setminus b).

L1L2L3L9
2.1

zXFz \in X \setminus \bigcup F holds exactly when zXz \in X and no member ss of FF has zsz \in s, that is, exactly when zXaz \in X \setminus a for every aFa \in F; the sets XaX \setminus a with aFa \in F are precisely the elements of {Xa:aF}\{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}, which is nonempty, so this is z{Xa:aF}z \in \bigcap \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}.

L1L4L5L9step 1.1
2.2

zXFz \in X \setminus \bigcap F holds exactly when zXz \in X and zz fails to lie in some member aa of FF, that is, exactly when zXaz \in X \setminus a for some aFa \in F; this is z{Xa:aF}z \in \bigcup \{\, X \setminus a : a \in F \,\}.

L1L4L5L9step 1.1
3.1

The two finite laws and the two family laws are established, which is the statement.

step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources