How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a function the relation is an equivalence relation on
Statement
Let be a function. Then
is a set, is a relation on , and is an equivalence relation on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a function .
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
For any parameters and any set , there is a set whose elements are exactly the elements of for which holds (The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula , ).
holds if and only if for some and some (The Cartesian product ).
is a relation on when (Relation, , , , and the specialisations "relation from to " and "relation on ").
reflexive: for every (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
symmetric: implies , for all (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
transitive: and imply , for all (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set ).
is transitive when and imply , for all (Reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, asymmetric, antisymmetric, transitive, and connex relations on a set).
Proof
is a set and a relation on : it is obtained by separating inside with the formula and the parameters and , so it is a subset of and each of its elements is an ordered pair.
It is reflexive on : for the value is a single set, so and .
It is symmetric: if then , hence and .
It is transitive: if and then and , hence and .
is a relation on that is reflexive on , symmetric and transitive, which is what it means to be an equivalence relation on .
Depends on
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set $A/{\sim}$
- The Cartesian product $A \times B := \{\, z \in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}(A \cup B)) : \exists a \in A\ \exists b \in B\ z = (a,b) \,\}$
- The Axiom Schema of Separation: for each formula $\varphi$, $\forall \bar p\,\forall x\,\exists y\,\forall z\,(z \in y \leftrightarrow (z \in x \wedge \varphi(z,\bar p)))$
- Reflexive, irreflexive, symmetric, asymmetric, antisymmetric, transitive, and connex relations on a set
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
Used by
- A two-to-one function on a four-element set, its kernel, the quotient, and the canonical factorisation computed explicitly Example
- Every function f : A → B factors as f = ι ∘ bar f ∘ π with π : A → A/ker f the surjective quotient map, bar f : A/ker f → f[A] the bijection [a] ↦ f(a), and ι : f[A] → B the inclusion injection; bar f is the only function making the factorisation hold Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 24 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Equivalence relation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kernel (set theory) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)