How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
, a second derivation of the Catalan count
Statement
For every , in ,
where is the Catalan number (The Catalan number ).
This is a second derivation of the Catalan count, by a group action rather than by a reflection: the route runs through the cycle lemma (The cycle lemma (Dvoretzky–Motzkin): if every and , then exactly of the cyclic shifts of have all partial sums positive) and the orbits of the cyclic shift, and it uses no reflection and no difference of binomial coefficients. The identity is consistent with (), and the consistency is the separate identity proved below.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a natural number ; the set of words of length over having exactly entries ; and the set of those all of whose partial sums , , are positive.
corresponds bijectively, through step words, to the set of ballot words of length , that is the words over a two-letter alphabet in which the two letters occur equally often and every prefix has at least as many of the first letter as of the second (Dyck paths of semilength ).
, , and the finite sum satisfies and (Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function).
If and a word of length has positions carrying and positions carrying , then its weight is ; and if has every letter at most and then exactly of the indices with are such that has all its partial sums positive (The cycle lemma (Dvoretzky–Motzkin): if every and , then exactly of the cyclic shifts of have all partial sums positive, clauses 2 and 1).
If then the stabiliser of under the shift action of is and the orbit of has exactly elements (If then the shift stabiliser of is trivial, so its orbit has exactly elements).
For every letter the number of positions of carrying equals the number of positions of carrying , and is a left action of on the words of length (Cyclic shifting is an action of on the words of length over a set, clauses 2 and 3).
For a left action of on the relation given by for some is an equivalence relation, its class at is the orbit of , and the distinct orbits partition (The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of iff for some , and hence partition the acted-on set).
For a finite set and , is the set of -element subsets of , and (The set of -element subsets and the binomial coefficient ).
If is finite and are pairwise disjoint finite sets, then is finite with (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition, clause 2).
For a constant natural number and a finite index set , (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form, clause (c)).
A subset of a finite set is finite (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if , clause 1).
If is finite and is a bijection then is finite and (The cardinality of a finite set).
For : is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ( is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ; such a is unique, equals the inverse relation , and is itself a bijection).
For with : ( for ; hence , the quotient is a natural number, and ).
for every , and (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
For all with : if then (Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor).
Integers and are coprime when ; and are coprime for every integer , since , and the relation is symmetric (Coprime integers: ).
Proof
The map sending to is a bijection from onto the -element subsets of the -element set , its inverse sending a subset to the word with entry at the positions of and elsewhere; so is finite with .
Every has positions carrying and the remaining positions carrying , so its weight is by the box-and-circle clause of [L1] with , and ; and every letter of is at most .
The set is in bijection with , so . A word has first partial sum , hence ; deleting it leaves the word of length over , whose partial sums are and whose total is , so has entries of each sign and every prefix at least as many entries as : a ballot word of length under the relabelling of and as the two letters. Prepending inverts the deletion and carries a ballot word back into , since the partial sums then become plus a nonnegative number and the total becomes . With [F1], [F2], [L9] and [L10] this gives .
The shift action of restricts to , because shifting preserves the number of positions carrying each letter by [L3]. Since , step 1.2 and [L2] make every stabiliser in trivial, so every orbit has exactly elements and the words with are pairwise distinct.
Each orbit meets in exactly one word: by [L1] with there is exactly one index in with , and by step 2.1 distinct indices give distinct words, so exactly one member of the orbit lies in . Hence (orbit of ) is a bijection from onto the set of orbits, whose members partition by [L4]; is finite by [L8] and step 1.1, and [L6] with index set together with [L7] gives .
Combining steps 1.1, 1.3 and 3.1 gives . For the consistency with [L14]: and , so [L11] gives , which with from [L12] reads ; and [L11] applied to gives , so by [L12]. Cancelling the nonzero factor by [L12] and [L13] gives , so multiplying the identity of this theorem by and the identity of [L14] by produces the same equation and the two closed forms agree. At the theorem reads .
Remarks
-
This is a different route, not a rearrangement. The reflection derivation matches paths that touch a level with paths from a reflected starting point; this one lets a cyclic group act on words and counts orbits. The two share only the definition of as a count of Dyck paths, and each yields a closed form the other does not produce directly: here and there.
-
Where the coprimality is spent. Every word in has weight , and is coprime to every modulus, so no orbit is short and no word is counted twice. Without that the orbit count would not be divided by the length, and the argument would give an inequality rather than an identity.
Depends on
- Coprime integers: $\gcd(a,b) = 1$
- The cycle lemma (Dvoretzky–Motzkin): if every $a_i\le1$ and $\lVert a\rVert=k\ge1$, then exactly $k$ of the $m$ cyclic shifts of $a$ have all partial sums positive
- If $\gcd(\lVert a\rVert,m)=1$ then the shift stabiliser of $a$ is trivial, so its orbit has exactly $m$ elements
- Cyclic shifting is an action of $\mathbb{Z}/m$ on the words of length $m$ over a set
- The Catalan number $C_n:=\lvert\mathcal{D}_n\rvert$
- Dyck paths of semilength $n$
- Cyclic shifts of an integer word and its periodic partial-sum function
- The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of $x\sim y$ iff $y=g\cdot x$ for some $g$, and hence partition the acted-on set
- The set $[A]^{k}$ of $k$-element subsets and the binomial coefficient $\binom{n}{k} := \lvert [n]^{k}\rvert$
- $\binom{n}{k}\,k!\,(n-k)! = n!$ for $k \le n$; hence $\binom{n}{k}\,k! = n^{\underline{k}}$, the quotient $n!/(k!(n-k)!)$ is a natural number, and $\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n-k}$
- $(n+1)\,C_n=\binom{2n}{n}$
- The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with $\lvert A \cup B\rvert = \lvert A\rvert + \lvert B\rvert$ and $\lvert\bigcup_{i \in I} A_i\rvert = \sum_{i \in I}\lvert A_i\rvert$, and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition
- The sum $\sum_{i \in S} a_i$ over a finite index set, and its product form
- A subset of a finite set is finite, with $\lvert B\rvert \le \lvert A\rvert$, and equality holds if and only if $B = A$
- The cardinality $\lvert A\rvert$ of a finite set
- $f : A \to B$ is a bijection if and only if there is a function $g : B \to A$ with $g \circ f = \Delta_A$ and $f \circ g = \Delta_B$; such a $g$ is unique, equals the inverse relation $f^{-1}$, and is itself a bijection
- The factorial $n!$ and the falling factorial $n^{\underline{k}}$, defined by recursion in $\mathbb{N}$
- Cancellation for multiplication by a nonzero factor
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- N. Dershowitz and S. Zaks, "The Cycle Lemma and Some Applications", Europ. J. Combinatorics 11 (1990) 35–40, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Postnikov (notes by A. Lin), MIT 18.212 Algebraic Combinatorics, Spring 2019 (standard reference, not scraped)