How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For and : if both are injective so is ; if both are surjective so is ; if is injective so is ; and if is surjective so is
Statement
Let and . Then , and
- (i) if and are injective then so is ;
- (ii) if and are surjective then so is ;
- (iii) if is injective then so is ;
- (iv) if is surjective then so is .
In particular a composite of bijections is a bijection.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: functions and .
is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all (Injection, surjection, bijection).
is surjective (onto) if for every there is some with (Injection, surjection, bijection).
is bijective if it is both injective and surjective (Injection, surjection, bijection).
is a function, , and for every in that domain (If and are functions then is a function with domain and there; is a function with ; and for ).
We write , and say is a function from to , when is a function with and (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
holds if and only if for some (The image and the preimage of a set under a relation).
Proof
: its domain is , which is because and ; and its values lie in .
Claim (i): assume and injective and let with . Injectivity of gives , and injectivity of gives .
Claim (ii): assume and surjective and let . Surjectivity of gives with , and surjectivity of gives with ; then .
Claim (iii): assume injective and let with . Then , so .
Claim (iv): assume surjective and let . There is with , and is an element of , so is a value of .
Claims (i) to (iv) are established; combining (i) and (ii) gives that a composite of bijections is injective and surjective, hence a bijection.
Depends on
- Injection, surjection, bijection
- If $f$ and $g$ are functions then $g \circ f$ is a function with domain $f^{-1}[\operatorname{dom} g]$ and $(g \circ f)(x) = g(f(x))$ there; $\Delta_A$ is a function with $\Delta_A(a) = a$; and $f \circ \Delta_A = f = \Delta_B \circ f$ for $f : A \to B$
- A function is a relation $f$ with $(a,b) \in f$ and $(a,c) \in f$ implying $b = c$; $f : A \to B$, the value $f(a)$, domain and codomain
- Relation, $\operatorname{dom} R$, $\operatorname{ran} R$, $\operatorname{fld} R$, and the specialisations "relation from $A$ to $B$" and "relation on $A$"
- The image $R[A]$ and the preimage $R^{-1}[B]$ of a set under a relation
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 25 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU), §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Function composition (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)